Literature Review on Relationship Building for Community-academic Collaboration in Health Research and Innovation
Tóm tắt
In response to European Commission Horizon 2020’s call for ‘science-for-and-with-community’, scholars have recognized the need to conduct ‘responsible research and innovation’ and engage more with communities to combat today’s complex health challenges. Hence, higher priority has been placed to cooperate with communities in health research and innovation development to better match societal values, needs and expectations. Accordingly, the approach of community-based participatory research (CBPR), the ‘gold standard’ within the community-engaged research spectrum, is the most widely discussed. However, it is seldom achieved in reality, as it requires establishment and maintenance of open, transparent, trustful and ongoing relationships between community partners and academia to succeed. Paradoxically, despite of the significance of quality collaborative relationship to the quality and success of community-academic collaboration, the key elements to achieve it were seldom discussed.Herein, the literature review aimed to (1) discuss the previous experiences and challenges in building and sustaining community-academic collaborative relationships; (2) examine the relationship building strategies for quality collaborative relationships; and (3) identify the potential research gaps for future research.Focusing on the area of health research and innovation, peer-reviewed articles, books and grey literature related to building and sustaining relationships in community-academic collaboration published between 1998 and 2018 were identified using the Web of Science, PubMed and Google Scholar bibliographic databases and Google search engine. Literature available in full-texts and English language with a focus on relationship aspects of community-academic collaboration were examined. Previous literature suggested thatacademics and community members encountered common challenges in experiencing inequitable relationships, distrust, divide between academia and community, uncommon norms of power sharing, dissemination of results and lack of resources for maintaining long-term relationships. Two approaches of relationship building: (1) personal qualities and competence, and (2) actions for relationship building from the beginning to the end stages of collaborative relationship were discussed. Literature revealed that the ways that academics approach, collaborate, communicate with and maintain in the community had significant impact on both current and future collaborative relationships. In addition, academics differed in acceptance and readiness towards community engagement, which could be attributed to the differences in personal qualities and competence. Future research should target on identifying the factors contributing to such individual differences and compare its impact on the quality of relationship with community, so as to better cultivate individuals’ readiness and capacity towards community engagement and effective relationship building with community.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ahmed S.M. et al. (2004) ‘Overcoming Barriers to Effective Community-Based Participatory Research in US Medical Schools’, Education for Health (Abingdon, England), 17(2), 141–151. doi: 10.1080/13576280410001710969
Ahmed, 2016, Progress in Community Health Partnerships : Research, Education, and Action, 10, 51, 10.1353/cpr.2016.0019
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (ed.) (2011) Principles of Community Engagement. 2nd edn. USA: National Institutes of Health.
Council of Higher Education (2004) Chapter Seven: Community Engagment. [online] available from https://innerweb.ukzn.ac.za/scer/Council%20on%20Higher%20Education/SA_HE_10years_Nov2004_Chapter7.pdf [09 June 2018].
del Pino, 2016, Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 10, 329, 10.1353/cpr.2016.0028
Eden G., Jirotka M. and Stahl B. (2013) Responsible Research and Innovation: Critical Reflection Into the Potential Social Consequences of ICT. Proceedings of the IEEE 7th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS). Held May 29-31, 2013 at Paris, France: 1-12.
Fletcher, 2013, Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 6, 131
García-Rivera, 2017, Puerto Rico Health Sciences Journal, 36, 92
Gass, 2005, Professional Development-Philadelphia, 8, 12
Huppert, 2000, Partnership Perspectives, 1, 47
Israel B.A. (2005) Methods in Community-based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass [online] available from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10304499 [09 June 2018].
Israel, 2006, Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 83, 1022, 10.1007/s11524-006-9110-1
Jacob K. (2013) Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation: Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Katz D.L. (2003) ‘Representing Your Community in Community-based Participatory Research: Differences Made and Measured’, Preventing Chronic Disease, 1(1).
LaVeaux, 2009, Pimatisiwin, 7, 1
Lemacks J., Landry A. and Wenzler P. (2018) ‘Formative research to identify community partnerships and foster relationships for health promotion research in South Mississippi’, Public Health. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.01.023
Luque J.S. et al. (2011) ‘A Social Network Analysis Approach to Understand Changes in a Cancer Disparities Community Partnership Network’, Annals of Anthropological Practice, 35(2). doi: 10.1111/j.2153-9588.2011.01085.x
Miller, 2015, Health Expectations : an International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy, 18, 2356, 10.1111/hex.12205
Minkler, 2004, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 31, 684, 10.1177/1090198104269566
Minkler, 2005, Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 82, ii3
Minkler M. et al. (2017) Community-based Participatory Research for Health : Advancing Social and Health Equity [online] available from http://www.myilibrary.com/?id=1041315 [09 June 2018].
Netshandama, 2010, International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 3, 70
Petrescu A.M.A. (2017) ‘Ways of Valorizing The Public Engagement In Responsible Research And Innovation’, 2nd Central and Eastern European LUMEN International Conference Multidimensional Education and Professional Development. Ethical Values, 2016: Cognitive-crcs, 617–622. doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.03.72
Pinto, 2009, Health Education & Behavior : The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 36, 930, 10.1177/1090198108328328
Roberts, 2013, International Public Health Journal, 5, 7
Ross, 2010, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics : JERHRE, 5, 19, 10.1525/jer.2010.5.1.19
Rothman, 2000, Metropolitan Universities, 11, 59
Serrell, 2009, Progress in Community Health Partnerships : Research, Education, and Action, 3, 53, 10.1353/cpr.0.0056
Staley K. (2009) Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. Eastleigh.
Tippins P., Bell M. and Lerner S. (1998) Building Relationships Between University and Community Paths to Partnership. Boulder and Littlefield: Rowman and University and Community as Learners in Interprofessional Education.
Trench B. (2008) ‘Towards an Analytical Framework of Science Communication Models’, in:‘Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices’. ed. by Cheng D. Dordrecht Springer, 119–135.
Wallerstein N. et al. (eds.) (2005) Developing and Maintaining Partnerships With Communities. San Francisco: John Wiley (Methods in community-based participatory research for health).
Winterbauer N.L. and Myers C. (2013) ‘Pracademics as Culture Brokers in Practice-based Participatory Research’. Proceedings of the Keeneland Conference,‘Public Health Services & Systems Research’. Held April 2018. Lexington, KY.