List composition and the word length effect in immediate recall: A comparison of localist and globalist assumptions

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review - Tập 10 - Trang 74-79 - 2003
Nelson Cowan1, Alan D. Baddeley2, Emily M. Elliott1, Jennifer Norris1
1Departmentof Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia
2University of Bristol, Bristol, England

Tóm tắt

Lists of short words usually are recalled better than lists of longer words in immediate recall tasks. Such word length effects might be explained bylocalist accounts, in which the length of each word in a list affects the recall of that word only, or byglobalist accounts, in which the lengths of at least some words affect the recall of other words (e.g., Baddeley, 1986). In a recent localist account, Neath and Nairne (1995) proposed that the recall of each word depends on the likelihood that features within the word are contaminated within the memory representation. We tested this by presenting not only homogeneous lists of short and long words, but also mixed lists, and by including articulatory suppression on some trials. The short-word advantage depended on the composition of the list, ruling out a strictly localist approach. There appear to be several globalist influences on recall, including distinctiveness factors as well as phonological storage and articulation.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press. Baddeley, A. [D.] (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 417–423. Baddeley, A. [D.] (2001). The magic number and the episodic buffer.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,24, 117–118. Baddeley, A. [D.], Lewis, V., &Vallar, G. (1984). Exploring the articulatory loop.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36A, 233–252. Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., &Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 575–589. Caplan, D., Rochon, E., &Waters, G. S. (1992). Articulatory and phonological determinants of word length effects in span tasks.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,45A, 177–192. Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., &Richman, B. (1971).The American Heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Chincotta, D., Underwood, G., Ghani, K. A., Papadopoulou, E., &Wresinki, M. (1999). Memory span for Arabic numerals and digit words: Evidence for a limited-capacity, visuo-spatial storage system.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,52A, 325–351. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,24, 87–185. Cowan, N., Day, L., Saults, J. S., Keller, T. A., Johnson, T., &Flores, L. (1992). The role of verbal output time in the effects of word length on immediate memory.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 1–17. Cowan, N., Nugent, L. D., Elliott, E. M., &Geer, T. (2000). Is there a temporal basis of the word length effect? A response to Service (1998).Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 647–660. Cowan, N., Wood, N. L., Nugent, L. D., &Treisman, M. (1997). There are two word length effects in verbal short-term memory: Opposed effects of duration and complexity.Psychological Science,8, 290–295. Fearnley, S. (1997). MRC Psycholinguistic Database search program.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,29, 291–295. Hulme, C., Maughan, S., &Brown, G. D. A. (1991). Memory for familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term memory span.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 685–701. Lovatt, P., Avons, S. E., &Masterson, J. (2000). The word-length effect and disyllabic words.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 1–22. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review,63, 81–97. Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 251–269. Neath, I., &Nairne, J. S. (1995). Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 429–441. Restorff, H. von (1933). Analyse von Vorgangen im Spurenfeld. I. über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildung im Spurenfeld [On the effect of field formations in the trace field: I. Analysis of processes in the trace field].Psychologische Forschung,18, 299–342. Service, E. (1998). The effect of word length on immediate serial recall depends on phonological complexity, not articulatory duration.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 283–304. Wilson, M. (1988). MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 6–10.