Cơ sở dữ liệu LinguaPix: Một nghiên cứu lớn về các tiêu chuẩn đặt tên hình ảnh
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adelman, J. S., Johnson, R. L., McCormick, S. F., McKague, M., Kinoshita, S., Bowers, J. S., Perry, J. R., Lupker, S. J., Forster, K. I., Cortese, M. J., Scaltritti, M., Aschenbrenner, A. J., Coane, J. H., White, L., Yap, M. J., Davis, C., Kim, J., & Davis, C. J. (2014). A behavioral database for masked form priming. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1052-1067. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0442-y
Alario, F. X., Ferrand, L., Laganaro, M., New, B., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Segui, J. (2004). Predictors of picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(1), 140-155. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195559
Altarriba, J., & Basnight-Brown, D. M. (2009). An overview of semantic processing in bilinguals: Methods and findings. The Bilingual Mental Lexicon: Interdisciplinary Approaches, 79-99. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691262-006
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445-459. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193014
Bates, E., D’Amico, S., Jacobsen, T., Székely, A., Andonova, E., Devescovi, A., Herron, D., Lu, C. C., Pechmann, T., Pléh, C., Wicha, N., Federmeier, K., Gerdjikova, I., Gutierrez, G., Hung, D., Hsu, J., Iyer, G., Kohnert, K., Mehotcheva, T., ... Tzeng, O. (2003). Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(2), 344-380. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196494
Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 527-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.001
Blackett, D. S., Harnish, S. M., Lundine, J. P., Zezinka, A., & Healya, E. W. (2017). The Effect of Stimulus Valence on Lexical Retrieval in Younger and Older Adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(7), 2081–2089.
Bonin, P., Méot, A., Laroche, B., Bugaiska, A., & Perret, C. (2019). The impact of image characteristics on written naming in adults. Reading and Writing, 32(1), 13-31.
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. (Technical report C-1). University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
Brodeur, M. B., Dionne-Dostie, E., Montreuil, T., & Lepage, M. (2010). The bank of standardized stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research. PloS One, 5(5), e10773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010773
Brodeur, M. B., Kehayia, E., Dion-Lessard, G., Chauret, M., Montreuil, T., Dionne-Dostie, E., & Lepage, M. (2012). The bank of standardized stimuli (BOSS): comparison between French and English norms. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 961-970. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0184-7
Brodeur, M. B., Guérard, K., & Bouras, M. (2014). Bank of standardized stimuli (BOSS) phase II: 930 new normative photos. PloS One, 9(9), e106953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106953
Cabitza, F. (2015). Re: What are the implications of using even or odd Likert scales for a research survey? Retrieved on 20.05.2021 from: https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_are_the_implications_of_using_even_or_odd_Likert_scales_for_a_research_survey/55b7a671614325f38f8b457a/citation/download. Accessed 1 June 2021
Cop, U., Dirix, N., Drieghe, D., & Duyck, W. (2017). Presenting GECO: An eye-tracking corpus of monolingual and bilingual sentence reading. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 602-615. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0734-0
Dan-Glauser, E. S., & Scherer, K. R. (2011). The Geneva affective picture database (GAPED): a new 730-picture database focusing on valence and normative significance. Behavior Research Methods, 43(2), 468.
De Houwer, J., & Hermans, D. (1994). Differences in the affective processing of words and pictures. Cognition & Emotion, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939408408925
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L. J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009). ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, (pp. 248-255). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848
Duñabeitia, J. A., Crepaldi, D., Meyer, A. S., New, B., Pliatsikas, C., Smolka, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2018). MultiPic: A standardized set of 750 drawings with norms for six European languages. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(4), 808-816. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1310261
Estes, Z., & Adelman, J. S. (2008). Automatic vigilance for negative words is categorical and general. Emotion, 8(4), 453–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012887
Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Augustinova, M., & Pallier, C. (2010). The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 488-496. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.42.2.488
Hutchison, K. A., Balota, D. A., Neely, J. H., Cortese, M. J., Cohen-Shikora, E. R., Tse, C. S., Yap, M. J., Bengson, J. J., Niemeyer, D., & Buchanan, E. (2013). The semantic priming project. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1099-1114. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0304-z
Johnston, R. A., Dent, K., Humphreys, G. W., & Barry, C. (2010). British-English norms and naming times for a set of 539 pictures: The role of age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 461-469.
Keuleers, E., & Balota, D. A. (2015). Megastudies, crowdsourcing, and large datasets in psycholinguistics: An overview of recent developments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1457-1468. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1051065
Keuleers, E., & Marelli, M. (2020). Resources for mental lexicon research: A delicate ecosystem. In V. Pirrelli, I. Plag, & W. U. Dressler (Eds.), Word Knowledge and Word Usage (pp. 167–188). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110440577-005
Keuleers, E., Diependaele, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: A lexical decision study on 14,000 Dutch mono- and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, Article 174, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174
Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 287-304. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4
Kousta, S.-T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112(3), 473–481.
Kuperman, V., Estes, Z., Brysbaert, M., & Warriner, A. B. (2014). Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1065–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035669
Kurdi, B., Lozano, S., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). Introducing the open affective standardized image set (OASIS). Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 457-470. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0715-3
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, 1, 39-58
Larsen, R. J., Mercer, K. A., Balota, D. A., & Strube, M. J. (2008). Not all negative words slow down lexical decision and naming speed: Importance of word arousal. Emotion, 8(4), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.4.445
Lin, T. Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014). Microsoft COCO: Common objects in context. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, (pp. 740-755). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48
McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30-46.
Moreno-Martínez, F. J., & Montoro, P. R. (2012). An ecological alternative to Snodgrass & Vanderwart: 360 high quality colour images with norms for seven psycholinguistic variables. PloS One, 7(5), e37527. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037527
Perret, C., & Bonin, P. (2019). Which variables should be controlled for to investigate picture naming in adults? A Bayesian meta-analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 51(6), 2533-2545.
Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.380
Rossion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33(2), 217-236. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5117
Roux, F., Armstrong, B. C., & Carreiras, M. (2017). Chronset: An automated tool for detecting speech onset. Behavior Research Methods, 49(5), 1864-1881. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0830-1
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime: User's Guide. Psychology Software Tools Incorporated.
Seidenberg, M. S., & Waters, G. S. (1989). Reading words aloud-a mega study. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27. 489.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420-428.
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x
White, K. K., Abrams, L., LaBat, L. R., & Rhynes, A. M. (2016). Competing influences of emotion and phonology during picture-word interference. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(2), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1101144