Linee guida e SIPMeL

Piero Cappelletti1
1SIPMeL, Castelfranco Veneto, TV, Italia

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Oosterhuis WP, Bruns DE, Watine J et al. (2004) Evidence-based guidelines in laboratory medicine: principles and methods. Clin Chem 50:806–818

http://www.g-i-n.net/library/international-guidelines-library (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

https://www.guideline.gov (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

http://www.sign.ac.uk (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

https://www.health.govt.nz (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

https://www.acc.org/guidelines (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

https://www.escardio.org (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

https://www.chestnet.org/Guidelines (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

https://www.asco.org/guidelines (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

http://iom.nationalacademies.org (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

http://www.snlg-iss.it (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

IOM (1990) Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. National Academy Press, Washington DC

IOM (1992) Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. National Academy Press, Washington DC

Kung J, Miller RR, Mackowiak PA (2012) Failure of Clinical Practice Guidelines to meet Institute of Medicine Standards. Two more decades of little, if any, progress. Arch Intern Med 172:1628–1633

IOM (2008) Knowing what works in health care: a roadmap for the Nation. National Academy Press, Washington DC

Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR et al. (1999) Why don’t physicians follow Clinical Practice Guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 282:1458–1465

IOM (2009) Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. National Academy Press, Washington DC

IOM (2011) Clinical Practice Guidelines we can trust. National Academy Press, Washington DC

Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE (2015) STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 351:h5527

Aakre KM, Langlois MR, Watine J et al. (2013) Critical review of laboratory investigations in clinical practice guidelines: proposals for the description of investigation. Clin Chem Lab Med 51:1217–1226

http://www.cap.org/web/home/resources/cap-guidelines?_afrLoop=2295555404233631 (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

https://www.rcpath.org/resource-library-homepage/clinical-effectiveness/clinical-guidelines.html (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

Wenham PR (2013) The annals as a disseminator of guidelines and promoter of best practice. Ann Clin Biochem 50:383–385

Hayward CP, Moffat KA, George TI et al. (2015) Assembly and evaluation of an inventory of guidelines that are available to support clinical hematology laboratory practice. Int J Lab Hematol 37(Suppl 1):36–45

https://www.escmid.org/escmid_library/medical_guidelines/escmid_guidelines/ (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

https://www.aacc.org/community/national-academy-of-clinical-biochemistry/practice-guidelines (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

IOM (2011) Finding what works in health care—standards for systematic reviews. National Academy Press, Washington DC

NACB (2014) Standard operating procedures for preparing, publishing and revising National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines. Including review and approval of external society/organization guidelines for endorsement and support by AACC/NACB. https://www.aacc.org/~/media/files/nacb/nacb_lmpg_sop_jan_2014.pdf?la=en (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

Don-Wauchope AC, Sievenpiper JL, Hill SA et al. (2012) Applicability of the AGREE II instrument in evaluating the development process and quality of current National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Guidelines. Clin Chem 58:1426–1437

Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP et al. (2010) AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ 182:e839–e842

The AGREE Enterprise Website. Appraisal of guidelines for research & evaluation (AGREE) instrument. http://www.agreetrust.org (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE et al. (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336:924–926

Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J et al. (2008) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ 336:1106–1110

http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/ (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

Misra S, Barth JH (2013) Guidelines are written, but are they followed? Ann Clin Biochem 50:400–402

Greco PJ, Eisenberg JM (1993) Changing physicians’ practice. N Engl J Med 329:1271–1273

SIPMeL (2014) Statuto. http://www.sipmel.it/it/documento.php/106362 (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

SIPMeL (2012) Regolamento dei gruppi di studio. http://www.sipmel.it/it/documento.php/1813 (Accesso 1 dicembre 2015)

Shojania KG, Sampson M, Ansari MT et al. (2007) How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis. Ann Intern Med 147:224–233

Price CP, Christenson RH (2007) Evidence-based laboratory medicine: principles, practice and outcomes, 2nd edn. AACC Press, Washington DC

Cappelletti P (2005) La risposta della Medicina di Laboratorio al quesito clinico. RIMeL/IJLaM 1(Suppl):15–23