Life cycle impact assessment research developments and needs
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Andersson-Skold Y, Grennfelt P, Pleijel K (1992) Photochemical ozone creation potentials. J Air Waste Manag 42:1152–1158
Anton A, Castells F, Montero JI (2007) Land use indicators in life cycle assessment. Case study: the environmental impact of Mediterranean greenhouses. J Clean Prod 15:432–438
Arpke A, Hutzler N (2006) Domestic water use in the United States—a life-cycle approach. J Ind Ecol 10:169–184
Baitz M, Kreissig J, Wolf M (2000) Method for integrating land use into life-cycle-assessment (LCA). Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 119:128–149
Bare JC (2000) LCIA midpoints vs. endpoints—how do we decide? International workshop on LCIA midpoints vs. endpoints—the sacrifices and the benefits
Bare JC (2003) Workshop introduction & background of meta model for LCA taxonomy. Taxonomy workshop
Bare JC, Gloria TP (2005) A closer look at life cycle impact assessment for the building design and construction industry. Building Design and Construction, Nov 22–24
Bare JC, Gloria TP (2008) Environmental impact assessment taxonomy providing comprehensive coverage of midpoints, endpoints, damages, and areas of protection. J Clean Prod 16:1021–1035
Bare JC, Udo de Haes HA, Pennington DW (1999) Life cycle impact assessment sophistication. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:299–306
Bare JC, Hofstetter P, Pennington DW, Udo de Haes HA (2000a) Life cycle impact assessment midpoints vs. endpoints—the sacrifices and the benefits. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:319–326
Bare JC, Pennington DW, Udo de Haes HA (2000b) An international workshop on life cycle impact assessment sophistication, EPA/600/R-00/023
Bare J, Fava J, Hertwich E, Hofstetter P, Huppes G, Jolliet O, Krewitt W, Lindeijer E, Muller-Wenk R, Owens W, Pennington D, Steen B, Tukker A, Udo de Haes H, Weidema B (2002) The areas of protection debate. In Klopffer W (ed) Gate to EHS: global LCA village
Bare JC, Norris GA, Pennington DW, McKone T (2003) TRACI—the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts. J Ind Ecol 6:49–78
Bare J, Gloria T, Norris G (2006) Development of the method and U.S. normalization database for life cycle impact assessment and sustainability metrics. Environ Sci Technol 40:5108–5115
Barnthouse L, Fava J, Humphreys K, Hunt R, Laibson L, Noesen S, Norris G, Owens J, Todd J, Vigon B, Weitz K, Young J (1997) Life-cycle impact assessment: the state of the art. SETAC Books, Pensacola
Bellekom S, Potting J, Benders R (2006) Feasibility of applying site-dependent impact assessment of acidification in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:417–424
Blonk H, Lafleur M, Spriensma R, Goedkoop M, Stevens S, Agterberg A, van Engelenburg B, Blok K (1997) Normalization figures for Dutch territory, Dutch consumption, and West European territory. http://www.pre.nl/normal.html . Accessed 28 Sept 2005
Brand G, Braunschweig A, Scheidegger A, Schwank O (1998) Weighting in ecobalances with the ecoscarcity method—ecofactors 1997, BUWAL Series 297
Breedveld L, Lafleur M, Blonk H (1999) A framework for actualizing normalization data in LCA: experiences in the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:213–220
Ciroth A, Fleischer G, Steinbach J (2004) Uncertainty calculation in life cycle assessments—a combined model of simulation and approximation. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:216–226
Derwent RG, Jenkin ME, Saunders SM (1996) Photochemical ozone creation potentials for a large number of reactive hydrocarbons under European conditions. Atmos Environ 30:181–199
Derwent RG, Jenkin ME, Saunders SM, Pilling MJ (1998) Photochemical ozone creation potentials for organic compounds in Northwest Europe calculated with a master chemical mechanism. Atmos Environ 32:2429–2441
Energy Information Administration—U.S. Department of Energy (2003) Annual energy review, DOE/EIA-0384
Fava J, Denison R, Jones B, Curran M, Vigon B, Selke S, Barnum J (1991) A technical framework for life-cycle assessment. SETAC Books, Pensacola
Fava J, Consoli F, Denison R, Dickson K, Mohin T, Vigon B (1993) A conceptual framework for life-cycle impact assessment. SETAC Books, Pensacola
Fava J, Jensen A, Lindfors L, Pomper S, Smet Bd, Warren J, Vigon B (1994) Life-cycle assessment data quality: a conceptual framework. SETAC Books, Pensacola
Finnveden G, Hofstetter P, Bare J, Basson L, Ciroth A, Mettier T, Seppala J, Johansson J, Norris G, Volkwein S (2002) Normalization, grouping, and weighting in life cycle impact assessment. In: Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild M, Hertwich E, Hofstetter P, Jolliet O, Klopffer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer E, Muller-Wenk R, Olsen S, Pennington D, Potting J, Steen B (eds) Life cycle impact assessment: striving towards best available practice. SETAC, Pensacola
Finnveden G, Eldh P, Johansson J (2006) Weighting in LCA based on ecotaxes—development of a mid-point method and experiences from case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:81–88
Geisler G, Hellweg S, Hungerbuhler K (2005) Uncertainty analysis in life cycle assessment (LCA): case study on plant-protection products and implications for decision making. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:184–192
Gloria TP, Bare JC (2003) Taxonomy of impact categories and the taxonomy structure: results from the UNEP/SETAC/EPA Hamburg workshop. In: LCA-LCM
Gloria TP, Lippiatt BC, Cooper J (2007) Life cycle impact assessment weights to support environmentally preferable purchasing in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 41:7551–7557
Goedkoop M (1995) The Eco-indicator 95. Pre consultants
Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (1999) The Eco-indicator 99: a damage orientated method for life cycle impact assessment. Ministry of VROM, The Hague
Goedkoop M, Demmers M, Collignon M (1996) The Eco-indicator 95. Pre consultants
Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A, Struijs J, van Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe 2008—a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and endpoint level, 1st edn. Report 1: characterisation
Hauschild M, Wenzel H (1998) Environmental assessment of products. Volume 2: Scientific background. Chapman & Hall, London
Hauschild MZ, Potting J, Hertel O, Schopp W, Bastrup-Birk A (2006) Spatial differentiation in the characterisation of photochemical ozone formation—the EDIP2003 methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:72–80
Hauschild M, Huijbregts M, Jolliet O, Margni M, MacLeod M, van de Meent D, Rosenbaum R, McKone T (2008) Building a model based on scientific consensus for life cycle impact assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony. Environ Sci Technol 42:7032–7036
Heijungs R, Guinée JB, Huppes G, Lankreijer RM, Udo de Haes HA, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Ansems AMM, Eggels PG, van Duin R, de Goede HP (1992a) Environmental life cycle assessment of products: guide and backgrounds (part 1). CML, Leiden
Heijungs R, Guinée JB, Huppes G, Lankreijer RM, Udo De Haes HA, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Ansems AMM, Eggels PG, van Duin R, de Goede HP (1992b) Environmental life cycle assessment of products: guide and backgrounds (part 2). CML, Leiden
Heijungs R, Guinée J, Huppes G (1997) Impact categories for natural resources and land use. CML report 138—section substances and products. Centre of Environmental Science (CML), Leiden University, Leiden
Hellweg S, Hofstetter TB, Hungerbuhler K (2003) Discounting and the environment—should current impacts be weighted differently than impacts harming future generations? Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:8–18
Hertwich E (1999) Value judgements and the public right—rebuttal to Marsmann et al. on ISO 14042. Int J Life Cycle Assess Gate EHS Glob LCA Village
Hertwich EG, Hammitt JK (2001a) A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment—part 2: midpoints, endpoints, and criteria for method development. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6:265–272
Hertwich EG, Hammitt JK (2001b) A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment—part I: LCA and decision analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6:5–12
Hertwich E, Pease W (1998) ISO 14042 restricts use and development of impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:180–181
Hertwich E, McKone T, Pease W (1999) Parameter uncertainty and variability in evaluative fate and exposure models. Risk Anal 19:1193–1204
Hertwich EG, McKone TE, Pease WS (2000) A systematic uncertainty analysis of an evaluative fate and exposure model. Risk Anal 20:439–454
Hertwich EG, Pennington DW, Bare JC (2002) Introduction. In: Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild M, Hertwich EG, Hofstetter P, Jolliet O, Klopffer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer EW, Muller-Wenk R, Olsen SI, Pennington DW, Potting J, Steen B (eds) Life cycle impact assessment: striving towards best available practice. SETAC, Pensacola
Hettelingh JP, Posch M, Potting J (2005) Country-dependent characterisation factors for acidification in Europe—a critical evaluation. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:177–183
Heuvelmans G, Muys B, Feyen J (2005) Extending the life cycle methodology to cover impacts of land use systems on the water balance. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:113–119
Hofstetter P (1998) Perspectives in life cycle impact assessment: a structured approach to combine models of the technosphere, ecosphere and valuesphere. Kluwer, Boston
Houghton JT, Filho LGM, Bruce JP, Lee H, Callander A, Haites EF (1995) Climate change 1994: radiative forcing of climate change and an evaluation of the IPCC 1992 IS92 emission scenarios, New York
Huijbregts MAJ (1999) Priority assessment of toxic substances in the frame of LCA. Development and application of the multi-media fate, exposure and effect model USES-LCA. Interfaculty Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
Huijbregts M (2001) Uncertainty and variability in environmental life-cycle assessment
Huijbregts MAJ, Seppala J (2001) Life cycle impact assessment of pollutants causing aquatic eutrophication. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6:339–343
Huijbregts MAJ, Thissen U, Guinee JB, Jager T, Kalf D, van de Meent D, Ragas AMJ, Sleeswijk AW, Reijnders L (2000) Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment. Part I: calculation of toxicity potentials for 181 substances with the nested multi-media fate, exposure and effects model USES-LCA. Chemosphere 41:541–573
Huijbregts MAJ, Breedveld L, Huppes G, de Koning A, van Oers L, Suh S (2003a) Normalisation figures for environmental life-cycle assessment—the Netherlands (1997/1998), Western Europe (1995) and the world (1990 and 1995). J Clean Prod 11:737–748
Huijbregts MAJ, Gilijamse W, Ragas AMJ, Reijnders L (2003b) Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life-cycle assessment. A case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one-family dwelling. Environ Sci Technol 37:2600–2608
International Standards Organization (1997) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—life cycle impact assessment. International Standard ISO14040:1997(E)
International Standards Organization (2000) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—life cycle impact assessment. International Standard ISO14042:2000(E)
International Standards Organization (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—life cycle impact assessment. ISO 14042
IPCC—Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1996) In: Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenberg A, Maskell K (eds) Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge
IPCC—Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001a) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis: contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
IPCC—Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001b) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis: contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Table 6.7 and Table 6.8. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
IPCC—Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2005) In: Metz B, Kuijpers L, Solomon S, Andersen SO, Davidson O, Pons J, de Jager D, Kestin T, Manning M, Meyer L (eds) Special report on safeguarding the ozone layer and the global climate system: issues related to hydrofluorocarbons and perfluorocarbons, special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge
Itsubo N, Inaba A (2003) A new LCIA method: LIME has been completed. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(5):305
Itsubo N, Sakagami M, Washida T, Kokubu K, Inaba A (2004) Weighting across safeguard subjects for LCIA through the application of conjoint analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:196–205
Jenkin ME, Hayman GD (1999) Photochemical ozone creation potentials for oxygenated volatile organic compounds: sensitivity to variations in kinetic and mechanistic parameters. Atmos Environ 33:1275–1293
Jolliet O, Margni M, Charles R, Humbert S, Payet J, Rebitzer G, Rosenbaum R (2003) IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:324–330
Jolliet O, Müller-Wenk R, Bare J, Brent A, Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Itsubo N, Peña C, Potting J, Pennington D, Rebitzer G, Schenck R, Stewart M, Haes HUd, Weidema B (2004) The LCIA midpoint-damage framework of the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:394–404
Koellner T (2002) Land use in product life cycles and its consequences for ecosystem quality. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:130–130
Koellner T, Scholz RW (2007) Assessment of land use impacts on the natural environment—part 1: an analytical framework for pure land occupation and land use change. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:16–23
Koellner T, Scholz RW (2008) Assessment of land use impacts on the natural environment—part 2: generic characterization factors for local species diversity in central Europe. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:32–48
Labouze E, Honore U, Moulay L, Couffignal B, Beekmann M (2004) Photochemical ozone creation potentials—a new set of characterization factors for different gas species on the scale of Western Europe. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:187–195
Lenzen M (2006) Uncertainty in impact and externality assessments—implications for decision-making. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:189–199
Lin MY, Zhang SS, Chen Y (2005) Distance-to-target weighting in life cycle impact assessment based on Chinese environmental policy for the period 1995–2005. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:393–398
Lindeijer E (1996) Normalization and valuation. In: Udo de Haes HA (ed) Towards a methodology for life cycle impact assessment. SETAC-Europe, Brussels
Lindeijer E, Alfers A (2001) Summary of step A of the Delfts Cluster Research Programme on land use in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6:186
Lindeijer E, Kampen M, Fraanje P (1998) Biodiversity and life support indicators for land use impacts in LCA, IVAM and IBN/DLO
Lo SC, Ma HW, Lo SL (2005) Quantifying and reducing uncertainty in life cycle assessment using the Bayesian Monte Carlo method. Sci Total Environ 340:23–33
Lundie S, Huijbregts MAJ, Rowley HV, Mohr NJ, Feitz AJ (2007) Australian characterisation factors and normalisation figures for human toxicity and ecotoxicity. J Clean Prod 15:819–832
Margni M, Gloria T, Bare J, Seppälä J, Steen B, Struijs J, Toffoletto L, Jolliet O (2008) Evaluation of category indicators and characterization models: application to eutrophication, Task Force 1 of the UNEP SETAC Life Cycle Initiative
Marsmann M, Olaf Ryding S, Udo de Haes H, Fava J, Owens W, Brady K, Saur K, Schenck R (1999) Letters to the editor—in reply to Hertwich & Pease, Int. J. LCA 3 (4) 180–181, “ISO 14042 restricts use and development of impact assessment”. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:65
Michelsen O (2008) Assessment of land use impact on biodiversity—proposal of a new methodology exemplified with forestry operations in Norway. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:22–31
Mila i Canals L, Clift R, Basson L, Hansen Y, Brandao M (2006) Expert workshop on land use impacts in life cycle assessment (LCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:363–368
Mila i Canals L, Bauer C, Depestele J, Dubreuil A, Knuchel RF, Gaillard G, Michelsen O, Muller-Wenk R, Rydgren B (2007a) Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:5–15
Mila i Canals L, Romanya J, Cowell SJ (2007b) Method for assessing impacts on life support functions (LSF) related to the use of ‘fertile land’ in life cycle assessment (LCA). J Clean Prod 15:1426–1440
Norris G (2003) Impact characterization in the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts—methods for acidification, eutrophication, and ozone formation. J Ind Ecol 6:79–101
Owens JW (2001) Water resources in life cycle impact assessment: considerations in choosing category indicators. J Ind Ecol 5:37–54
Potting J, Hauschild MZ (2006) Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment—a decade of method development to increase the environmental realism of LCIA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:11–13
Potting J, Schopp W, Blok K, Hauschild M (1998) Comparison of the acidifying impact from emissions with different regional origin in life-cycle assessment. J Hazard Mater 61:155–162
Rosenbaum R, Bachmann T, Huijbregts M, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Koehler A, Larsen H, MacLeod M, Margni M, McKone T, Payet J, Schuhmacher M, Meent D, Hauschild M (2008) USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:532–546
Ross S, Evans D, Webber M (2002) How LCA studies deal with uncertainty. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:47–52
Schmidt JH (2008) Development of LCIA characterisation factors for land use impacts on biodiversity. J Clean Prod 16:1929–1942
Schmidt WP, Sullivan J (2002) Weighting in life cycle assessments in a global context. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:5–10
Seppala J (2007) On the meaning of fuzzy approach and normalisation in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:464–469
Seppala J, Hamalainen RP (2001a) On the meaning of the distance-to-target weighting method and normalisation in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6:211–218
Seppala J, Hamalainen RP (2001b) Relationships between weighting factors and normalisation in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6:218–218
Seppala J, Knuuttila S, Silvo K (2004) Eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems—a new method for calculating the potential contributions of nitrogen and phosphorus. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:90–100
Seppala J, Posch M, Johansson M, Hettelingh JP (2006) Country-dependent characterisation factors for acidification and terrestrial eutrophication based on accumulated exceedance as an impact category indicator. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:403–416
Sleeswijk AW, van Oers L, Guinee JB, Struijs J, Huijbregts MAJ (2008) Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: an LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000. Sci Total Environ 390:227–240
Soares SR, Toffoletto L, Deschenes L (2006) Development of weighting factors in the context of LCIA. J Clean Prod 14:649–660
Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Alley RB, Berntsen T, Bindoff NL, Chen Z, Chidthaisong A, Gregory JM, Hegerl GC, Heimann M, Hewitson B, Hoskins BJ, Joos F, Jouzel J, Kattsov V, Lohmann U, Matsuno T, Molina M, Nicholls N, Overpeck J, Raga G, Ramaswamy V, Ren J, Rusticucci M, Somerville R, Stocker TF, Whetton P, Wood RA, Wratt D (2007) Technical summary. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 33–34
Spitzley DV, Tolle DA (2008) Evaluating land-use impacts: selection of surface area metrics for life-cycle assessment of mining. J Ind Ecol 8:11–21
Steen B (1999a) A systematic approach to environmental priority strategies in products development (EPS). Version 2000—general system characteristics—CPM report 1999:4. Chalmers University of Technology, Gotheburg
Steen B (1999b) A systematic approach to environmental priority strategies in products development (EPS). Version 2000—models and data—CPM report 1999:5. Chalmers University of Technology, Gotheburg
Strauss K, Brent AC, Hietkamp S (2006) Characterisation and normalisation factors for life cycle impact assessment mined abiotic resources categories in South Africa—the manufacturing of catalytic converter exhaust systems as a case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:162–171
Swan G (1998) Evaluation of land use in life cycle assessment. Center for Environmental Assessment of Product and Material Systems (CPM), Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg
Toffoletto L, Bulle C, Godin J, Reid C, Deschenes L (2007) LUCAS—A new LCIA method used for a Canadian-specific context. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:93–102
Udo de Haes HA (1996) Towards a methodology for life cycle impact assessment. SETAC Books, Brussels
Udo de Haes HA (1998) ISO’s compromise on comparative assertions in life cycle impact assessment. J Ind Ecol 2:4–7
Udo de Haes HA (2006) How to approach land use in LCIA or, how to avoid the Cinderella effect? Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:219–221
Udo de Haes H, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild M, Hertwich E, Hofstetter P, Jolliet O, Klopffer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer E, Muller-Wenk R, Olsen S, Pennington D, Potting J, Steen B (2002) Life-cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice. SETAC Books, Pensacola
UNFCCC—The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2000) Review of the implementation of commitments and of other provisions of the convention, national communications: greenhouse gas inventories from parties included in Annex 1 to the convention. UNFCCC Guidelines on Reporting and Review. Table 1: 1995 IPCC global warming potential (GWP) values based on the effects of greenhouse gases over a 100-year time horizon. As provided by the IPCC in its Second Assessment Report, p 14
US Environmental Protection Agency (1989a) Exposure factors handbook. Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC
US Environmental Protection Agency (1989b) Risk assessment guidance for superfund. Volume I. Human health evaluation manual (part A). Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC
US Environmental Protection Agency (1997) Exposure factors handbook. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
US Green Building Council (2008a) Introduction to the LEED 2009 credit weighting tool
US Green Building Council (2008b) LEED 2009 credit weighting
US Green Building Council (2008c) LEED 2009 weightings background
van Oers L, Huppes G (2001) LCA normalization factors for the Netherlands, Western Europe and the World. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6:256
Van Zelm R, Huijbregts MAJ, Van Jaarsveld HA, Reinds GJ, De Zwart D, Struijs J, Van de Meent D (2007) Time horizon dependent characterization factors for acidification in life-cycle assessment based on forest plant species occurrence in Europe. Environ Sci Technol 41:922–927
Vogtlander JG, Lindeijer E, Witte JPM, Hendriks C (2004) Characterizing the change of land-use based on flora: application for EIA and LCA. J Clean Prod 12:47–57
Wagendorp T, Gulinck H, Coppin P, Muys B (2006) Land use impact evaluation in life cycle assessment based on ecosystem thermodynamics. Energy 31:112–125
Wenzel H, Hauschild M (1997) Environmental assessment of products. Volume 1: Methdology, tools and case studies in product development. Chapman & Hall, London
WMO—World Meteorological Organization (1999) Scientific assessment of ozone depletion: 1998. Global ozone research and monitoring project—report no. 44, Geneva, Switzerland
WMO—World Meteorological Organization (2003) Scientific assessment of ozone depletion: 2002. Global ozone research and monitoring project—report no. 47, Geneva, Switzerland, p 498, Table 1.6–1.7
WMO—World Meteorological Organization (2007) Scientific assessment of ozone depletion: 2006. Global ozone research and monitoring project—report no. 50, Geneva, Switzerland, p 572
Wurtenberger L, Koellner T, Binder CR (2006) Virtual land use and agricultural trade: estimating environmental and socio-economic impacts. Ecol Econ 57:679–697