Life cycle assessment applied on alternative production of carbon-based sorbents – A comparative study

Segreto, 2020, Trends in social acceptance of renewable energy across Europe—A literature review, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 9161, 10.3390/ijerph17249161 Ryšavý, 2021, Influence of flue gas parameters on conversion rates of honeycomb catalysts, Sep. Purif. Technol., 278, 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119491 Zelenková, 2021, Thermoporometry of porous carbon: the effect of the carbon surface chemistry on the thickness of non-freezable pore water layer (delta layer), Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 326, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111358 Behnood, 2013, Application of natural sorbents in crude oil adsorption, Iran. J. Oil Gas Sci. Technol., 2, 1 Jeswani, 2015, Removal of organic compounds from water: life cycle environmental impacts and economic costs of the Arvia process compared to granulated activated carbon, J. Clean. Prod., 89, 203, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.017 Riley, 2013, Chalcogen-based aerogels as sorbents for radionuclide remediation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 7540, 10.1021/es400595z Balintova, 2016, A study of sorption heavy metals by natural organic sorbents, Environments., 2, 189 Rajec, 1996, Sorption of radionuclides on inorganic sorbents, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 208, 477, 10.1007/BF02040065 Müller, 2009, Investigation of the enhanced water gas shift reaction using natural and synthetic sorbents for the capture of CO2, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48, 10284, 10.1021/ie900772q Bruch, 2007 Webb, 2003, Introduction to chemical adsorption analytical techniques and their applications to catalysis, Micromerit. Inst. Corp Techn. Publ., 1 Demirbaş, 2010, 24, 471 Pereira, 2012, Sustainable energy: a review of gasification technologies, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 16, 4753, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.023 Călin, 2021, Performance analysis of a RDF gasification and solar thermal energy based CCHP system, Energy Rep., 7, 186, 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.06.032 Shen, 2018, Mercury removal by biomass-derived porous carbon: experimental and theoretical insights into the effect of H2S, Chem. Eng. J., 348, 409, 10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.019 Yang, 2018, Removal of Hg0 from simulated flue gas over silver-loaded rice husk gasification char, R. Soc. Open Sci., 5, 10.1098/rsos.180248 Fuente-Cuesta, 2012, Biomass gasification chars for mercury capture from a simulated flue gas of coal combustion, J. Environ. Manag., 98, 23, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.013 Han, 2022, Gasification characteristics of waste plastics (SRF) in a bubbling fluidized bed: effects of temperature and equivalence ratio, Energy., 238, 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121944 Vonk, 2019, Comparative analysis of wood and solid recovered fuels gasification in a downdraft fixed bed reactor, Waste Manag., 85, 106, 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.12.023 Xu, 2021, Potential hazards of novel waste-derived sorbents for efficient removal of mercury from coal combustion flue gas, J. Hazard. Mater., 412, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125226 Hwang, 2014, Characterization of products obtained from pyrolysis and steam gasification of wood waste, RDF, and RPF, Waste Manag., 34, 402, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.009 Arena, 2016, Life cycle assessment of activated carbon production from coconut shells, J. Clean. Prod., 125, 68, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.073 Kočí, 2009 Curran, 2017, 1 Výtisk, 2020, Current options in the life cycle assessment of additive manufacturing products, Open Eng., 9, 674, 10.1515/eng-2019-0073 Gonçalves, 2022, Life cycle assessment studies on lightweight materials for automotive applications - An overview, Energy Rep., 8, 338, 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.067 AzariJafari, 2021, Towards comparable environmental product declarations of construction materials: insights from a probabilistic comparative LCA approach, Build. Environ., 190, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107542 Havukainen, 2022, Environmental performance of dewatered sewage sludge digestate utilization based on life cycle assessment, Waste Manag., 137, 210, 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.11.005 Moura, 2022, Life cycle energy and carbon emissions of essential oil extraction from rosemary, Energy Rep., 8, 291, 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.063 Bassani, 2022, Ecodesign approach for pharmaceutical packaging based on life cycle assessment, Sci. Total Environ., 816, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151565 Guinée, 2002 Heijungs, 1995, On the usefulness of life cycle assessment of packaging, Environ. Manag., 19, 665, 10.1007/BF02471948 Matuštík, 2020, Life cycle assessment of biochar-to-soil systems: a review, J. Clean. Prod., 259, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120998 I.S. Organization, 1997 de Normalización, 2006 Wang, 2022, Life cycle assessment of combustion-based electricity generation technologies integrated with carbon capture and storage: a review, Environ. Res., 207, 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112219 Dong, 2018, Comparison of waste-to-energy technologies of gasification and incineration using life cycle assessment: case studies in Finland, France and China, J. Clean. Prod., 203, 287, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.139 Rosenbaum, 2018, Life cycle impact assessment, 167 Huijbregts, 2017, ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 22, 138, 10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y Dekker, 2020, A taste of the new ReCiPe for life cycle assessment: consequences of the updated impact assessment method on food product LCAs, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 25, 2315, 10.1007/s11367-019-01653-3 Mostashari-Rad, 2020, Data supporting midpoint-weighting life cycle assessment and energy forms of cumulative exergy demand for horticultural crops, Data Brief., 33, 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106490 European Commission Service Site Product Sustainability Software & Data, Sphera, (n.d.). https://sphera.com/product-sustainability-software/ (accessed December 20, 2022). Čespiva, 2023, Softwood and solid recovered fuel gasification residual chars as sorbents for flue gas mercury capture, Environ. Technol. Innov., 29, 10.1016/j.eti.2022.102970 Čespiva, 2020, Characterization of tars from a novel, pilot scale, biomass gasifier working under low equivalence ratio regime, Renew. Energy, 159, 775, 10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.042 Čespiva, 2020, Solid-recovered fuel to liquid conversion using fixed bed gasification technology and a Fischer–Tropsch synthesis unit – Case study, Intern. J. Energy Product. Manage., 5, 212, 10.2495/EQ-V5-N3-212-222 Pallarés, 2018, Production and characterization of activated carbon from barley straw by physical activation with carbon dioxide and steam, Biomass Bioenergy, 115, 64, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.04.015 Frischknecht, 2015, Cumulative energy demand in LCA: the energy harvested approach, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 20, 957, 10.1007/s11367-015-0897-4 Barahmand, 2022, A scoping review on environmental, economic, and social impacts of the gasification processes, Environments., 9, 92, 10.3390/environments9070092 Carpentieri, 2005, Life cycle assessment (LCA) of an integrated biomass gasification combined cycle (IBGCC) with CO2 removal, Energy Convers. Manag., 46, 1790, 10.1016/j.enconman.2004.08.010 Dong, 2019, Key factors influencing the environmental performance of pyrolysis, gasification and incineration waste-to-energy technologies, Energy Convers. Manag., 196, 497, 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.06.016 Dong, 2018, Life cycle assessment of pyrolysis, gasification and incineration waste-to-energy technologies: theoretical analysis and case study of commercial plants, Sci. Total Environ., 626, 744, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.151 Hauschild, 2005, Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment-the EDIP2003 methodology, Environ. News., 80, 1 H. Gu, R. Bergman, N. Anderson, S. Alanya-Rosenbaum, Life cycle assessment of activated carbon from woody biomass, Wood Fiber Sci. 50 (3): 229–243. Kozyatnyk, 2020, Comparative environmental assessment of end-of-life carbonaceous water treatment adsorbents, Bioresour. Technol., 302, 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122866 Guinée, 2002 Sleeswijk, 2008, Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: an LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000, Sci. Total Environ., 390, 227, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.09.040 Dong, 2019, Key factors influencing the environmental performance of pyrolysis, gasification and incineration waste-to-energy technologies, Energy Convers. Manag., 196, 497, 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.06.016 Chomkhamsri, 2011, International reference life cycle data system (ILCD) handbook: review schemes for life cycle assessment, Towards Life Cycle Sustainabil. Manage., 107, 10.1007/978-94-007-1899-9_11 ISO/TR 21916:2021(en), Solid recovered fuels — Guidance for the specification of solid recovered fuels (SRF) for selected uses, (n.d.). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:tr:21916:ed-1:v1:en (accessed December 21, 2022). Hidden emissions: A story from the Netherlands Case Study Study Anshassi, 2019, Approaches to integrate sustainable materials management into waste management planning and policy, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 148, 55, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.011 Výtisk, 2022, Comparative study by life cycle assessment of an air ejector and orifice plate for experimental measuring stand manufactured by conventional manufacturing and additive manufacturing, Sustain. Mater. Technol., 32 Agegnehu, 2016, Benefits of biochar, compost and biochar-compost for soil quality, maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions in a tropical agricultural soil, Sci. Total Environ., 543, 295, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.054 Matuštík, 2020, Life cycle assessment of biochar-to-soil systems: a review, J. Clean. Prod., 259, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120998 Rathnayake, 2018, Utilization of coal fly ash and bottom ash as solid sorbents for sulfur dioxide reduction from coal fired power plant: life cycle assessment and applications, J. Clean. Prod., 202, 934, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.204