Life cycle assessment and risk assessment of liquefied natural gas vehicles promotion
Tài liệu tham khảo
Sharafian, 2019, Liquefied natural gas tanker truck-to-tank transfer for on-road transportation, Appl Therm Eng, 162, 114313, 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114313
Bicer, 2018, Life cycle environmental impact assessments and comparisons of alternative fuels for clean vehicles, Resour Conserv Recycl, 132, 141, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.036
Smajla, 2019, Fuel switch to LNG in heavy truck traffic, Energies, 12, 515, 10.3390/en12030515
Pfoser, 2018, Acceptance of LNG as an alternative fuel: determinants and policy implications, Energy Pol, 120, 259, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.046
2019
2016
Sun, 2020, Life cycle assessment and Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate the environmental impact of promoting LNG vehicles, Methods (Orlando), 7, 101046
2018
2019
Ewing, 2019
Arteconi, 2013, LNG as vehicle fuel and the problem of supply: the Italian case study, Energy Pol, 62, 503, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.016
Kumar, 2011, LNG: an eco-friendly cryogenic fuel for sustainable development, Appl Energy, 88, 4264, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.06.035
Ma, 2013, The development of natural gas as an automotive fuel in China, Energy Pol, 62, 531, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.066
Tong, 2015, Comparison of life cycle greenhouse gases from natural gas pathways for medium and heavy-duty vehicles, Environ Sci Technol, 49, 7123, 10.1021/es5052759
Osorio-Tejada, 2017, Liquefied natural gas: could it be a reliable option for road freight transport in the EU?, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 71, 785, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.104
Peng, 2018, Development and application of China provincial road transport energy demand and GHG emissions analysis model, Appl Energy, 222, 313, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.139
Naumanen, 2019, Development strategies for heavy duty electric battery vehicles: comparison between China, EU, Japan and USA, Resour Conserv Recycl, 151, 104413, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104413
Hu, 2017, The evaluation on liquefied natural gas truck promotion in Shenzhen freight, Adv Mech Eng, 9, 10.1177/1687814017705065
Arteconi, 2010, Life-cycle greenhouse gas analysis of LNG as a heavy vehicle fuel in Europe, Appl Energy, 87, 2005, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.11.012
Cooper, 2019, Life cycle environmental impacts of natural gas drivetrains used in UK road freighting and impacts to UK emission targets, Sci Total Environ, 674, 482, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.091
He, 2021, Life-cycle greenhouse gas emission benefits of natural gas vehicles, ACS Sustainable Chem Eng, 9, 7813, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01324
Langshaw, 2020, Environmental and economic analysis of liquefied natural gas (LNG) for heavy goods vehicles in the UK: a Well-to-Wheel and total cost of ownership evaluation, Energy Pol, 137, 111161, 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111161
Pourahmadiyan, 2021, Dynamic simulation and life cycle greenhouse gas impact assessment of CNG, LNG, and diesel-powered transit buses in British Columbia, Canada, Transport Res Transport Environ, 92, 102724, 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102724
Yuan, 2019, Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of multi-pathways natural gas vehicles in China considering methane leakage, Appl Energy, 253, 113472, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113472
Hagos, 2017
Clark, 2017, Pump-to-wheels methane emissions from the heavy-duty transportation sector, Environ Sci Technol, 51, 968, 10.1021/acs.est.5b06059
Alamia, 2016, Well-to-wheel analysis of bio-methane via gasification, in heavy duty engines within the transport sector of the European Union, Appl Energy, 170, 445, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.001
Weller, 2020, A national estimate of methane leakage from pipeline mains in natural gas local distribution systems, Environ Sci Technol, 54, 8958, 10.1021/acs.est.0c00437
Clark, 2017, Future methane emissions from the heavy-duty natural gas transportation sector for stasis, high, medium, and low scenarios in 2035, J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 67, 1328, 10.1080/10962247.2017.1368737
Alvarez, 2018, Assessment of methane emissions from the US oil and gas supply chain, Science, 80, 186
Hu, 2018, Large methane emissions from natural gas vehicles in Chinese cities, Atmos Environ, 187, 374, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.06.007
Pan, 2020, Methane emissions from natural gas vehicles in China, Nat Commun, 11, 1
2014
Garrett, 2018, Proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals in the Rio Grande valley of Texas–citizen group participation versus natural gas corporations, J Glob Responsib, 9, 58, 10.1108/JGR-11-2017-0055
Lavrenteva, 2020, Energy policy in the arctic: yamal LNG in Russian international and domestic political agenda, J Cross-Regional Dialogues/La Rev Dialogues Inter-Régionaux, 83
Hughes, 2015
Amin, 2019, LNG and LPG market development in Bangladesh, 67
Prontera, 2016
White, 2020
Warrick
Browne, 2012, How should barriers to alternative fuels and vehicles be classified and potential policies to promote innovative technologies be evaluated?, J Clean Prod, 35, 140, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.019
Simmer, 2014, LNG as an alternative fuel: the steps towards European implementation, WIT Trans Ecol Environ, 186, 887, 10.2495/ESUS140791
2020
2006
2006
Bhatt, 2019, Cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) of low-impact-development (LID) technologies in southern Ontario, J Environ Manag, 231, 98, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.033
Kang, 2020, Characterizing the generation and spatial patterns of carbon emissions from urban express delivery service in China, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 80, 106336, 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106336
Wang, 2008
Ke, 2017, Well-to-wheels energy consumption and emissions of electric vehicles: mid-term implications from real-world features and air pollution control progress, Appl Energy, 188, 367, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.011
Rocco, 2018, Modelling road transport technologies in future scenarios: theoretical comparison and application of Well-to-Wheels and Input-Output analyses, Appl Energy, 232, 583, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.222
Sharafian, 2019, Policy implications of liquefied natural gas use in heavy-duty vehicles: examples in Canada and British Columbia, Transport Res Transport Environ, 69, 123, 10.1016/j.trd.2019.01.021
Huibregts, 2017, A harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level report I: characterization, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 22, 138, 10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y
Toniolo, 2017, Life Cycle Assessment to support the quantification of the environmental impacts of an event, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 63, 12, 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.07.007
Raluy, 2020, Life cycle assessment of a domestic gas-fired water heater: influence of fuel used and its origin, J Environ Manag, 254, 109786, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109786
Huarachi, 2020, Life cycle assessment of traditional and alternative bricks: a review, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 80, 106335, 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106335
Goedkoop, 2009, vol. 1, 1
Metropolis, 1949, The Monte Carlo method, J Am Stat Assoc, 44, 335, 10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310
Rubinstein, 2016, vol. 10
Tian, 2018, A review of uncertainty analysis in building energy assessment, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 93, 285, 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.029
Nguyen, 2014, A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis, Appl Energy, 113, 1043, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.061
Andress, 2011, Reducing GHG emissions in the United States' transportation sector, Energy Sustain Dev, 15, 117, 10.1016/j.esd.2011.03.002
Song, 2017, Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of diesel/LNG heavy-duty vehicle fleets in China based on a bottom-up model analysis, Energy, 140, 966, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.011
Mayfield, 2017, System-wide and superemitter policy options for the abatement of methane emissions from the US natural gas system, Environ Sci Technol, 51, 4772, 10.1021/acs.est.6b05052
2015
2021