Life cycle assessment and risk assessment of liquefied natural gas vehicles promotion

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews - Tập 153 - Trang 111769 - 2022
Shouheng Sun1, Myriam Ertz1
1LaboNFC, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC), 555 Boulevard de l’Université, Chicoutimi (QC), G7H 2B1, Canada

Tài liệu tham khảo

Sharafian, 2019, Liquefied natural gas tanker truck-to-tank transfer for on-road transportation, Appl Therm Eng, 162, 114313, 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114313 Bicer, 2018, Life cycle environmental impact assessments and comparisons of alternative fuels for clean vehicles, Resour Conserv Recycl, 132, 141, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.036 Smajla, 2019, Fuel switch to LNG in heavy truck traffic, Energies, 12, 515, 10.3390/en12030515 Pfoser, 2018, Acceptance of LNG as an alternative fuel: determinants and policy implications, Energy Pol, 120, 259, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.046 2019 2016 Sun, 2020, Life cycle assessment and Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate the environmental impact of promoting LNG vehicles, Methods (Orlando), 7, 101046 2018 2019 Ewing, 2019 Arteconi, 2013, LNG as vehicle fuel and the problem of supply: the Italian case study, Energy Pol, 62, 503, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.016 Kumar, 2011, LNG: an eco-friendly cryogenic fuel for sustainable development, Appl Energy, 88, 4264, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.06.035 Ma, 2013, The development of natural gas as an automotive fuel in China, Energy Pol, 62, 531, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.066 Tong, 2015, Comparison of life cycle greenhouse gases from natural gas pathways for medium and heavy-duty vehicles, Environ Sci Technol, 49, 7123, 10.1021/es5052759 Osorio-Tejada, 2017, Liquefied natural gas: could it be a reliable option for road freight transport in the EU?, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 71, 785, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.104 Peng, 2018, Development and application of China provincial road transport energy demand and GHG emissions analysis model, Appl Energy, 222, 313, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.139 Naumanen, 2019, Development strategies for heavy duty electric battery vehicles: comparison between China, EU, Japan and USA, Resour Conserv Recycl, 151, 104413, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104413 Hu, 2017, The evaluation on liquefied natural gas truck promotion in Shenzhen freight, Adv Mech Eng, 9, 10.1177/1687814017705065 Arteconi, 2010, Life-cycle greenhouse gas analysis of LNG as a heavy vehicle fuel in Europe, Appl Energy, 87, 2005, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.11.012 Cooper, 2019, Life cycle environmental impacts of natural gas drivetrains used in UK road freighting and impacts to UK emission targets, Sci Total Environ, 674, 482, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.091 He, 2021, Life-cycle greenhouse gas emission benefits of natural gas vehicles, ACS Sustainable Chem Eng, 9, 7813, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01324 Langshaw, 2020, Environmental and economic analysis of liquefied natural gas (LNG) for heavy goods vehicles in the UK: a Well-to-Wheel and total cost of ownership evaluation, Energy Pol, 137, 111161, 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111161 Pourahmadiyan, 2021, Dynamic simulation and life cycle greenhouse gas impact assessment of CNG, LNG, and diesel-powered transit buses in British Columbia, Canada, Transport Res Transport Environ, 92, 102724, 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102724 Yuan, 2019, Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of multi-pathways natural gas vehicles in China considering methane leakage, Appl Energy, 253, 113472, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113472 Hagos, 2017 Clark, 2017, Pump-to-wheels methane emissions from the heavy-duty transportation sector, Environ Sci Technol, 51, 968, 10.1021/acs.est.5b06059 Alamia, 2016, Well-to-wheel analysis of bio-methane via gasification, in heavy duty engines within the transport sector of the European Union, Appl Energy, 170, 445, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.001 Weller, 2020, A national estimate of methane leakage from pipeline mains in natural gas local distribution systems, Environ Sci Technol, 54, 8958, 10.1021/acs.est.0c00437 Clark, 2017, Future methane emissions from the heavy-duty natural gas transportation sector for stasis, high, medium, and low scenarios in 2035, J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 67, 1328, 10.1080/10962247.2017.1368737 Alvarez, 2018, Assessment of methane emissions from the US oil and gas supply chain, Science, 80, 186 Hu, 2018, Large methane emissions from natural gas vehicles in Chinese cities, Atmos Environ, 187, 374, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.06.007 Pan, 2020, Methane emissions from natural gas vehicles in China, Nat Commun, 11, 1 2014 Garrett, 2018, Proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals in the Rio Grande valley of Texas–citizen group participation versus natural gas corporations, J Glob Responsib, 9, 58, 10.1108/JGR-11-2017-0055 Lavrenteva, 2020, Energy policy in the arctic: yamal LNG in Russian international and domestic political agenda, J Cross-Regional Dialogues/La Rev Dialogues Inter-Régionaux, 83 Hughes, 2015 Amin, 2019, LNG and LPG market development in Bangladesh, 67 Prontera, 2016 White, 2020 Warrick Browne, 2012, How should barriers to alternative fuels and vehicles be classified and potential policies to promote innovative technologies be evaluated?, J Clean Prod, 35, 140, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.019 Simmer, 2014, LNG as an alternative fuel: the steps towards European implementation, WIT Trans Ecol Environ, 186, 887, 10.2495/ESUS140791 2020 2006 2006 Bhatt, 2019, Cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) of low-impact-development (LID) technologies in southern Ontario, J Environ Manag, 231, 98, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.033 Kang, 2020, Characterizing the generation and spatial patterns of carbon emissions from urban express delivery service in China, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 80, 106336, 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106336 Wang, 2008 Ke, 2017, Well-to-wheels energy consumption and emissions of electric vehicles: mid-term implications from real-world features and air pollution control progress, Appl Energy, 188, 367, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.011 Rocco, 2018, Modelling road transport technologies in future scenarios: theoretical comparison and application of Well-to-Wheels and Input-Output analyses, Appl Energy, 232, 583, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.222 Sharafian, 2019, Policy implications of liquefied natural gas use in heavy-duty vehicles: examples in Canada and British Columbia, Transport Res Transport Environ, 69, 123, 10.1016/j.trd.2019.01.021 Huibregts, 2017, A harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level report I: characterization, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 22, 138, 10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y Toniolo, 2017, Life Cycle Assessment to support the quantification of the environmental impacts of an event, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 63, 12, 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.07.007 Raluy, 2020, Life cycle assessment of a domestic gas-fired water heater: influence of fuel used and its origin, J Environ Manag, 254, 109786, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109786 Huarachi, 2020, Life cycle assessment of traditional and alternative bricks: a review, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 80, 106335, 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106335 Goedkoop, 2009, vol. 1, 1 Metropolis, 1949, The Monte Carlo method, J Am Stat Assoc, 44, 335, 10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310 Rubinstein, 2016, vol. 10 Tian, 2018, A review of uncertainty analysis in building energy assessment, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 93, 285, 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.029 Nguyen, 2014, A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis, Appl Energy, 113, 1043, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.061 Andress, 2011, Reducing GHG emissions in the United States' transportation sector, Energy Sustain Dev, 15, 117, 10.1016/j.esd.2011.03.002 Song, 2017, Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of diesel/LNG heavy-duty vehicle fleets in China based on a bottom-up model analysis, Energy, 140, 966, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.011 Mayfield, 2017, System-wide and superemitter policy options for the abatement of methane emissions from the US natural gas system, Environ Sci Technol, 51, 4772, 10.1021/acs.est.6b05052 2015 2021