Leverage, liquidity, volatility, time horizon, and the risk of ruin

Review of Financial Economics - Tập 11 - Trang 225-239 - 2002
Erik Norland1, D.Sykes Wilford1
1SPS Holdings, 107 Potterson Avenue, Greenwich, CT 06830, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractIn order to meet their financial goals, investors, whether institutions or individuals, must make asset allocation decisions by balancing their return targets with their tolerance for volatility, their liquidity requirements, and time horizons. Yet even optimal mixes of investments with regard to time horizon, liquidity, and volatility levels are sometimes not adequate to achieve the return objectives of a firm or an individual. Using leverage scales up both returns and risks, introducing the potential for default. When using leverage, either as a fund manager or as an investor into a fund, fully understanding the potential for default is absolutely necessary. Using standard measures of risk and return can be very misleading. Sharpe ratios and information ratios can lead the investor into a state of unwarranted comfort with respect to the probability of losing more than is acceptable. Many traditional measures of risk do not deal with this problem correctly. This paper takes a barrier option theoretic approach to analyzing the potential for losses and the potential for the leveraged investor to be knocked‐out of his position even under circumstances of perfect knowledge of the end return. Thus, it demonstrates the necessity of a more rigorous approach to understanding the risk of any particular style of investment, particularly when dealing with hedge funds.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Amin G.S., 2001, Hedge fund performance 1990–2000 P.Bernstein.Risk and insurance: the hidden links.Risk.2001 January 10.1080/13504869500000010 Duoady R.(1994).Options à limite et options à limite double. Working paper. Jorion Ph.(1999).Risk management lessons from long‐term capital management.University of California Working Paper. 10.1111/j.1467-9965.1992.tb00033.x H.E.Leland.Beyond mean–variance: performance measurement in a nonsymmetrical world.Financial Analysts Journal.1999 January/February Modigliani F., 1958, The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment, American Economic Review, 48 Musiela M., 1998, Martingale methods in financial modeling: stochastic modeling and applied probability Norland E. &Wilford D. S.(in press).Global portfolios should be optimized in excess not total returns.Review of Financial Economics. B.H.Putnam J.M.Quintana.Mean–variance optimal portfolio models and the inappropriateness of the assumption of a time‐stable variance–covariance matrix.Review of Financial Economics.1991 Fall Rubenstien M., 1991, Breaking down the barriers, Risk, 4, 28 Smith W.C., 1995, Managing financial risk Wilford D.S., 2000, Risk management adapts yet again
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Review of Financial Economics

Tập 11

225-239

Thông tin tác giả