Let’s Use Cognitive Science to Create Collaborative Workstations

Moskowitz, 2015, Gathering storm clouds suggest the need for a culture change in radiology: radiologist-centered imaging, Radiology, 276, 3, 10.1148/radiol.2015142738 Jaeger, 2014, Automatic tuberculosis screening using chest radiographs, IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 33, 233, 10.1109/TMI.2013.2284099 Seltzer, 1995, Spiral CT of the chest: comparison of cine and film-based viewing, Radiology, 197, 73, 10.1148/radiology.197.1.7568857 Tombaugh, 1946, The search for the ninth planet, Pluto, Astronom Soc Pacific Leaf, 5, 73 Lemkin, 2005, Comparing 2-D electrophoretic gels across Internet databases, 279 VanderBeek, 2010, Comparing the detection and agreement of parapapillary atrophy progression using digital optic disk photographs and alternation flicker, Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 248, 1313, 10.1007/s00417-010-1376-z Funk, 2002, Flicker comparison of optic disc photographs: sensitivity and specificity, Klin Monbl Augenheilkd, 219, 862, 10.1055/s-2002-36946 Berger, 2000, Computerized stereochronoscopy and alternation flicker to detect optic nerve head contour change, Ophthalmology, 107, 1316, 10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00157-3 Josephs, 2016, Shuffling your way out of change blindness, Psych Bull Rev, 23, 193, 10.3758/s13423-015-0886-4 Drew, 2015, Image toggling saves time in mammography, J Med Imaging, 3, 011003 Gur, 2004, Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system, J Natl Cancer Inst, 96, 185, 10.1093/jnci/djh067 Colquhoun, 1967, Influence of signal probability during pretraining on vigilance decrement, J Exp Psychol, 73, 153, 10.1037/h0024087 See, 1995, Meta-analysis of the sensitivity decrement in vigilance, Psychol Bull, 117, 230, 10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.230 Swets, 1970, Attention. Annu Rev Psychol, 21, 339, 10.1146/annurev.ps.21.020170.002011 Wolfe, 2005, Rare targets are often missed in visual search, Nature, 435, 439, 10.1038/435439a Evans, 2013, If you don’t find it often, you often don’t find it: why some cancers are missed in breast cancer screening, PLoS ONE, 8, e64366, 10.1371/journal.pone.0064366 Gur, 2008, The “laboratory” effect: comparing radiologists’ performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations, Radiology, 249, 47, 10.1148/radiol.2491072025 Wolfe, 2010, Varying target prevalence reveals two dissociable decision criteria in visual search, Curr Biol, 20, 121, 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.066 Evans, 2011, Prevalence of abnormalities influences cytologists’ error rates in screening for cervical cancer, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 135, 1557, 10.5858/arpa.2010-0739-OA Wolfe, 2013, Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners: trained observers miss rare targets, too, J Vision, 13, 33 Nass, 2015 Kundel, 1978, Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection, Invest Radiol, 13, 175, 10.1097/00004424-197805000-00001 Kundel, 1972, Visual search patterns and experience with radiological images, Radiology, 103, 523, 10.1148/103.3.523 Mello-Thoms, 2003, Perception of breast cancer: eye-position analysis of mammogram interpretation, Acad Radiol, 10, 4, 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80782-1 Aizenman A, Drew T, Georgian-Smith D, Wolfe JM. Comparing search strategy in breast tomosynthesis and 2D mammogram: an eye tracking study paper. Presented at: Annual Meeting of the Vision Science Society; May 2014. Drew, 2013, Scanners and drillers: characterizing expert visual search through volumetric images, J Vision, 13 Csíkszentmihályi, 2008