Lessons from benchmarking environmental performance at automobile assembly plants

Benchmarking - 2005
SandraRothenberg1, BrianSchenck2, JamesMaxwell3
1Rochester Institute of Technology, College of Business, Rochester, New York, USA
2Intel Corporation, Chandler, Arizona, USA
3JSI Research and Training Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to better understand benefits and problems with different approaches to benchmarking environmental performance in manufacturing.Design/methodology/approachThis paper shares the experience of a research program developing environmental benchmarking measures for the automobile industry.FindingsIn this paper, we categorize these options into four general categories: regulatory, gross emissions, efficiency, and life cycle. We found that firms emphasized different approaches to benchmarking depending upon regulatory context and company strategy. Product type, corporate and national culture, resource costs, stakeholder demands also all played a role in influencing their preferred benchmarking approach. Overall, the most robust environmental programs will incorporate elements of all four approaches.Research limitations/implicationsThe primary limitation of this study is that it draws its data from only one industry. Another limitation of this paper is that it is focused primarily on performance benchmarking. Additional research needs to be done to understand the factors that influence a firm's choice of benchmarking metrics, the relationship between the different aspects of environmental performance benchmarking, and the relationship between performance and managerial benchmarking.Practical implicationsFirms must supplement strong environmental management systems with their benchmarking strategy. Using all four provides a more balanced benchmarking effort, and minimizes limitation that single measure of environmental performance present.Originality/valueFor manufacturing firms, this paper offers a framework to think about the costs and benefits of a range of environmental benchmarking strategies. For researchers, it outlines a number of areas for future research.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bailey, J. (1992), “VOC regs ‘Drive’ auto paint line design”, Industrial Finishing, Vol. 10/92, p. 58.

Barbera, A.J. and McConnell, V.D. (1990), “The impact of environmental regulations on industry productivity: direct and indirect effects”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 18, pp. 50‐65.

Coglianese, C. and Nash, J. (Eds) (2001), Regulating from the Inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals?, Resources for the Future Press, Washington, DC.

Gerde, V.W. and Logsdon, J. (2001), “Measuring environmental performance: use of the toxics release inventory (TRI) and other US environmental databases”, Business, Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 10, pp. 269‐85.

Guinee, J.B., Udo de Haes, H.A. and Huppes, G. (1993), “Quantitative life cycle analysis of products”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 3‐13.

Hart, S. and Ahuja, G. (1996), “Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance”, Business, Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 5, pp. 30‐7.

King, A.A. and Lenox, M.J. (2000), “Industry self‐regulation without sanctions: the chemical industry's responsible care program”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 698‐716.

Klassen, R. and McLaughlin, C.P. (1996), “The impact of environmental management on firm performance”, Management Science, Vol. 42 No. 8, pp. 1199‐214.

MacLean, H.L. and Lave, L.B. (1998), “A life cycle model of an automobile: resource use an environmental discharges in the production and use phases”, Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 32 No. 13, pp. 322A‐30A.

Malone, C. (1989‐1990), “Environmental performance assessment: a case study of an emerging methodology”, Journal of Environmental Systems, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 171‐84.

Matthews, D. (2003), “Environmental management systems for internal corporate environmental benchmarking”, Benchmarking An International Journal, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 95‐106.

Matthews, S. and Lave, L. (2003), “Using input‐output analysis for corporate benchmarking”, Benchmarking An International Journal, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 153‐68.

Montabon, F. and Melnyk, S.A., et al., (2000), “ISO 14000: assessing its perceived impact on corporate performance”, The Journal of Supply Chain Management, pp. 4‐16.

Morris, S.A. (1997), “Environmental pollution and competitive advantage: an exploratory study of US industrial‐goods manufacturers”, Academy of Management Proceedings, Academy of Management, Boston, MA, pp. 411‐15.

Naimon, J.S. (1994), “Benchmarking and environmental trend indicators”, Total Quality Environmental Management, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 269‐82.

Pil, F. and Rothenberg, S. (2003), “Environmental performance as a driver of superior organizational performance”, Journal of Production and Operations Management, Vol. 12 No. 3.

Rothenberg, S. and Pil, F., et al., (2001), “Lean, green and the quest for superior performance”, Journal of Production and Operations Management, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 228‐43.

Spendolini, M.I. (1992), The Benchmarking Book, American Management Association, New York, NY.

Womack, J.P. and Jones, D.T., et al. (1990), The Machine that Changed the World, Rawson Associates, New York, NY.

Russell, I.P. (2001), Quality Management Benchmark Assessment, ASQC Quality Press, Milwauke, WI.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Benchmarking

Thông tin tác giả