Lay People Esthetic Evaluation of Primary Surgical Repair on Three-Dimensional Images of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

Medicina (Lithuania) - Tập 55 Số 9 - Trang 576
Edoardo Staderini1, Marilisa De Luca1, Ettore Candida1, Maria Ida Rizzo2, Oriana Rajabtork Zadeh2, Daria Bucci2, Mario Zama2, Carlo Lajolo1, Massimo Cordaro1, Patrizia Gallenzi1
1Institute of Dentistry and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico “A. Gemelli”, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
2Craniofacial Centre-Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit of the Children’s Hospital Bambino Gesù, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy

Tóm tắt

Background and Objectives: Previous literature has disclosed that facial attractiveness affects the esthetic evaluation of nose and lip deformity on frontal and lateral photographs. However, it has never been debated if the removal of the external facial features on three-dimensional (3D) models (“cropped assessment bias”) could provide a considerable usefulness in the interpretation and comparison of the results. Additionally, it has been assumed on two-dimensional (2D) studies that esthetic assessment biases with respect to observer gender, and it is not acknowledged if and to the extent that “gender assessment bias” may be influenced by a three-dimensional layout. The aim of this study is to investigate if facial traits and observers’ gender may affect the esthetic ratings of unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients after soft tissue reconstruction. Materials and Methods: Three-dimensional images of ten UCLP patients’ images were acquired before the intervention (T0), one-month (T1) and six-months (T2) postoperative. Geomagic® software (version 2014; 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA) was used to remove the external facial features of 3D surface models. Five-point scale developed by Asher-McDade et al. was used to rate both nasolabial attractiveness and impairment for full-face (FF) and cropped-face (CF) 3D images. Forty-three judges (21 males, 22 females) were enrolled for the esthetic evaluation. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to test intra- and inter-examiner reliability; a value of 0.7 was set as the minimum acceptable level of reliability. Results: When comparing the 2 sets of observations (FF and CF), the ICC ranged from 0.654 to 0.823. Concerning gender assessment bias, the ICC ranged from 0.438 to 0.686 and from 0.722 to 0.788 for males and females, respectively. Concerning inter-examiner reliability, ICC for questions 2–7 ranged from 0.448 to 0.644 and from 0.659 to 0.817 at T0 and T2, respectively. Conclusions: The removal of external facial features provides subtle differences on the esthetic assessment of UCLP patients. Moreover, based on our data, examiners’ gender differences may affect esthetic assessment of UCLP patients. Despite the subjectivity of esthetic judgments, a reliable, validated and reproducible scoring protocol should consider the influence of gender differences on 3D esthetic assessment of UCLP patients.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Zaleckas, 2011, The comparison of different surgical techniques used for repair of complete unilateral cleft lip, Medicina, 47, 85, 10.3390/medicina47020011

Gkantidis, 2013, Aesthetic outcome of cleft lip and palate treatment. Perceptions of patients, families, and health professionals compared to the general public, J. Cranio Maxillofac Surg., 41, e105, 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.11.034

Molsted, 2017, Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 8. Assessing naso-labial appearance in 5-year-olds—A preliminary study, J. Plast. Surg. Hand Surg., 51, 64, 10.1080/2000656X.2016.1266492

Papamanou, 2012, Appreciation of cleft lip and palate treatment outcome by professionals and laypeople, Eur. J. Orthod., 34, 553, 10.1093/ejo/cjr073

Paiva, 2014, Aesthetic evaluation of the nasolabial region in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate comparing expert versus nonexperience health professionals, BioMed Res. Int., 2014, 460106, 10.1155/2014/460106

Schwirtz, 2018, Rating nasolabial aesthetics in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: Cropped versus full-face images, Cleft Palate Craniofac. J., 55, 747, 10.1177/1055665617747702

Eichenberger, 2014, Facial attractiveness of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate and of controls assessed by laypersons and professionals, Eur. J. Orthod., 36, 284, 10.1093/ejo/cjt047

Staderini, E., Patini, R., Camodeca, A., Guglielmi, F., and Gallenzi, P. (2019). Three-dimensional assessment of morphological changes following nasoalveolar molding therapy in cleft lip and palate patients: A case report. Dent. J., 7.

Shaw, 1985, The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults, Am. J. Orthod., 87, 21, 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90170-8

Kuijpers, M.A., Chiu, Y.T., Nada, R.M., Carels, C.E., and Fudalej, P.S. (2014). Three-dimensional imaging methods for quantitative analysis of facial soft tissues and skeletal morphology in patients with orofacial clefts: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 9.

Moher, 1998, CONSORT: An evolving tool to help improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, JAMA, 279, 1489, 10.1001/jama.279.18.1489

Saponaro, G., Doneddu, P., Gasparini, G., Staderini, E., Boniello, R., Todaro, M., D’Amato, G., Pelo, S., and Moro, A. (2019). Custom made onlay implants in peek in maxillofacial surgery: A volumetric study. Childs Nerv. Syst.

Staderini, 2018, Three-dimensional stereophotogrammetric analysis of nasolabial soft tissue effects of rapid maxillary expansion: A systematic review of clinical trials, Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital., 38, 399, 10.14639/0392-100X-2059

Heike, 2010, 3D digital stereophotogrammetry: A practical guide to facial image acquisition, Head Face Med., 6, 18, 10.1186/1746-160X-6-18

Isidor, 2018, Three-dimensional evaluation of changes in upper airway volume in growing skeletal Class II patients following mandibular advancement treatment with functional orthopedic appliances, Angle Orthod., 88, 552, 10.2319/083117-587.1

Desmedt, 2015, Nasolabial symmetry and esthetics in cleft lip and palate: Analysis of 3D facial images, Clin. Oral. Investig., 19, 1833, 10.1007/s00784-015-1445-0

Bertens, L.C., Broekhuizen, B.D., Naaktgeboren, C.A., Rutten, F.H., Hoes, A.W., van Mourik, Y., Moons, K.G., and Reitsma, J.B. (2013). Use of expert panels to define the reference standard in diagnostic research: A systematic review of published methods and reporting. PLoS Med., 10.

Roberts, 1991, Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate, Cleft Palate Craniofac. J., 28, 385, 10.1597/1545-1569_1991_028_0385_doamfr_2.3.co_2

Tobiasen, 1993, Combined effects of severity of cleft impairment and facial attractiveness on social perception: An experimental study, Cleft Palate Craniofac. J., 30, 82, 10.1597/1545-1569_1993_030_0082_ceosoc_2.3.co_2

Ritter, 2002, Validity of subjective evaluations for the assessment of lip scarring and impairment, Cleft Palate Craniofac. J., 39, 587, 10.1597/1545-1569(2002)039<0587:VOSEFT>2.0.CO;2

Kocher, 2016, Judgment of nasolabial esthetics in cleft lip and palate is not influenced by overall facial attractiveness, Cleft Palate Craniofac. J., 53, e45, 10.1597/14-019

Tobiasen, 1991, Development of scales of severity of facial cleft impairment, Cleft Palate Craniofac. J., 28, 419, 10.1597/1545-1569_1991_028_0419_dososo_2.3.co_2

Sinko, 2017, Facial aesthetics in young adults after cleft lip and palate treatment over five decades, Sci. Rep., 7, 15864, 10.1038/s41598-017-16249-w

Kiekens, 2007, Influence of panel composition on aesthetic evaluation of adolescent faces, Eur. J. Orthod., 29, 95, 10.1093/ejo/cjl060

Tobiasen, 1988, Reliability of esthetic ratings of cleft impairment, Cleft Palate J., 25, 313

Mercado, 2011, The Americleft study: An inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate part 4. Nasolabial aesthetics, Cleft Palate Craniofac. J., 48, 259, 10.1597/09-186.1

Brattstrom, 2005, The Eurocleft study: Intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 2: Craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance, Cleft Palate Craniofac. J., 42, 69, 10.1597/02-119.2.1

Mosmuller, 2013, Scoring systems of cleft-related facial deformities: A review of literature, Cleft Palate Craniofac. J., 50, 286, 10.1597/11-207

McLaughlin, 2009, The effect of differential rater function over time (DRIFT) on objective structured clinical examination ratings, Med. Educ., 43, 989, 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03438.x

Millett, 2005, Methods of assessment of cleft-related facial deformity: A review, Cleft Palate Craniofac. J., 42, 145, 10.1597/02-149.1

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Medicina (Lithuania)

Tập 55 Số 9

576

Thông tin tác giả