Larger screw diameter may not guarantee greater pullout strength for headless screws – a biomechanical study
Tóm tắt
Headless compression screws (HCSs) are commonly utilized devices for small bone fracture fixation. The Mini-Acutrak 2 and headless reduction (HLR) screws are the newer version types, in which both have fully threaded and variable pitch design. Specifically, the HLR is characterized by two thread runouts to facilitate implantation. With the thread runouts, the holding strength of the screw may be compromised. To the best of our knowledge, no study has examined the pullout force of the global sizes of a HCS. We sought to determine the pullout strength of the HLR and compare the strength of this screw with that of the Mini-Acutrak 2. Synthetic bone blocks with simulated transverse fractures were used to conduct the tests. Four commonly used sizes of the HLR were examined, and one Mini-Acutrak 2 was employed for comparison. Five screws of each size were tested. The pullout force of all screws that were tested in this study ranged from 45.23 to 233.22 N. The results revealed that the pullout force increased as the screw diameter increased. Interestingly, we found that one small screw outperformed the Mini-Acutrak 2, which has a larger diameter. This study provided extensive knowledge regarding the pullout strength of fully threaded HCSs of different sizes. An unexpected finding is that a small screw has higher holding power than a large one because of its increased number of threads. Therefore, we suggest that the thread number should be a critical consideration for the design of size distribution of HCSs.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
ACUTRAK 2 Headless Compression Screw 2005; available at: http://implantesclp.com/uploads/pdf/Acutrak.pdf [Accessed 28 Jan. 2016].
Assari S, Darvish K, Ilyas AM. Biomechanical analysis of second-generation headless compression screws. Injury 2012; 43: 1159–1165.
ASTM F1839-08. Standard specification for rigid polyurethane foam for use as a standard material for testing orthopaedic devices and instruments. American Society for Testing and Materials 2012.
Bailey C, Kuiper J, Kelly C. Biomechanical evaluation of a new composite bioresorbable screw. J Hand Surg Br 2006; 31: 208.
Baran O, Sagol E, Oflaz H, Sarikanat M, Havitcioglu H. A biomechanical study on preloaded compression effect on headless screws. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129: 1601–1605.
Chapman JR, Harrington RM, Lee KM, Anderson PA, Tencer AF, Kowalski D. Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. J Biomech Eng 1996; 118: 391–398.
DeCoster TA, Heetderks DB, Downey DJ, Ferries JS, Jones W. Optimising bone screw pullout force. J Orthop Trauma 1990; 4: 169–174.
Goldstein SA. The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function. J Biomech 1987; 20: 1055–1061.
Haisman JM, Rohde RS, Weiland AJ. Acute fractures of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 2750–2758.
Herbert TJ, Fisher WE. Management of the fractured scaphoid using a new bone screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984; 66: 114–123.
Huebner RJ, Conrad GL, Jensen DG. Variable pitch bone screw. USA Patent Document. 1999: 5, 871, 486.
Ramaswamy R, Evans S, Kosashvili Y. Holding power of variable pitch screws in osteoporotic, osteopenic and normal bone: are all screws created equal? Injury 2010; 41: 179–183.
Sano S, Rokkaku T, Saito S, Tokunaga S, Abe Y, Moriya H. Herbert screw fixation of capitellar fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: 307–311.
Wheeler DL, McLoughlin SW. Biomechanical assessment of compression screws. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 350: 237–245.