Large trials or meta-analysis? That is not the question

Abalos E, Carroli G & Mackey M. The tools and techniques of evidenced-based medicine. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2004; this issue, doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.008. Collins, 2001, Reliable assessment of the effects of treatment on mortality and major morbidity. I: Clinical trials, Lancet, 357, 373, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03651-5 Stephenson, 1998, Why do we need randomized controlled trials to assess behavioural interventions?, BMJ, 316, 611, 10.1136/bmj.316.7131.611 Villar, 1996, Methodological issues of randomized controlled trials for the evaluation of reproductive health interventions, Prev Med, 25, 365, 10.1006/pmed.1996.0067 Villar, 2001, Meta-analyses in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in perinatal medicine: comparison of fixed and random effect model, Stat Med, 20, 3635, 10.1002/sim.1096 Villar, 1997, Factors affecting the comparability of meta-analyses and largest trials' results in perinatology, J Clin Epidemiol, 50, 997, 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00148-0 Petitti, 2000 Duley, 2002, Big is still beautiful: why we still need large simple trials, 42 Abalos, 2004, Anti-hypertensive drug therapy for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy (Cochrane review) Villar, 2001, WHO antenatal care randomized trial for the evaluation of model of routine antenatal care, Lancet, 357, 1151, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04722-X Gülmezoglu, 2001, The WHO multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate the use of misoprostol in the management of the third stage of labour, Lancet, 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05835-4 WHO Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial of Calcium Supplementation for the Prevention of Pre-eclampsia among Low Calcium Intake Women. Trial 98295. Geneva: WHO, 2001. 1995, Which anticonvulsant for women with eclampsia? Evidence from the Collaborative Eclampsia Trial, Lancet, 345, 1455, 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91034-4 Piaggio, 2001, Methodological considerations on the design and analysis of an equivalence stratified cluster randomization trial, Stat Med, 20, 401, 10.1002/1097-0258(20010215)20:3<401::AID-SIM801>3.0.CO;2-1 Donner, 2000 Donner, 1998, Methodological considerations in the design of the WHO antenatal care randomized controlled trial, Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 12, 59, 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1998.00007.x Villar, 1995, Predictive ability of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, Lancet, 345, 772, 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90646-0 Johnson, 1997, Larger trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials, JAMA, 277, 376, 10.1001/jama.1997.03540290029025 Cappelleri, 1996, Large trials vs meta-analyses of small trials: how do their results compare?, JAMA, 276, 1332, 10.1001/jama.1996.03540160054033 Le Lorier, 1997, Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials, N Engl J Med, 337, 536, 10.1056/NEJM199708213370806 Moses, 2002, Comparing results of large trials to those of meta-analyses, Stat Med, 21, 793, 10.1002/sim.1098 Ionnidis, 1998, Issues in comparisons between meta-analyses and large trials, JAMA, 279, 1089, 10.1001/jama.279.14.1089 Klebanoff, 1997, Large trials versus meta-analysis of smaller trials, JAMA, 277, 376, 10.1001/jama.1997.03540290028024 Furukawa, 2000, Discrepancies among mega-trials, J Clin Epidemiol, 53, 1193, 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00250-X Atallah, 2004, Calcium supplementation during pregnancy for preventing hypertensive disorders and related problems (Cochrane review) Villar, 2000, Same nutrient, different hypotheses: disparities in trials of calcium supplementation during pregnancy, Am J Clin Nutr, 71, 1375S, 10.1093/ajcn/71.5.1375s