Large-scale river restoration pays off: A case study of ecosystem service valuation for the Emscher restoration generation project

Anzaldua, G., Gerner, N. V., Hinzmann, M., Beyer, S., Lago, M. et al. & Rouillard, J. (2016): Framework for evaluating changes in ecosystem services. Part A: DESSIN Cookbook and Part B: Companion Document. Technical Report for Deliverable 11.2 of the DESSIN FP7 Project. Available online at https://dessin-project.eu/?page_id=2050. Anzaldua, 2018, Getting into the water with the Ecosystem Services Approach: the DESSIN ESS Evaluation Framework, Ecosyst. Serv., 30, 318, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.004 Barabas, 2013 Beysiegel, 2015 Birk, 2012, Three hundred ways to assess Europe’s surface waters. An almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive, Ecol. Indic., 18, 31, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.10.009 Boeraeve, 2015, How (not) to perform ecosystem service valuations. Pricing gorillas in the mist, Biodivers. Conserv., 24, 187, 10.1007/s10531-014-0796-1 Boerema, 2014, Economic valuation of ecosystem services, a case study for aquatic vegetation removal in the Nete catchment (Belgium), Ecosyst. Serv., 7, 46, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.08.001 Boyd, 2007, What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units, Ecol. Econ., 63, 616, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002 Cierjacks, 2010, Carbon stocks of soil and vegetation on Danubian floodplains, Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde, 173, 644, 10.1002/jpln.200900209 Costanza, 1997, The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387, 253, 10.1038/387253a0 Daily, 2009, Ecosystem services in decision making. Time to deliver, Front. Ecol. Environ., 7, 21, 10.1890/080025 De Groot, 2002, A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services, Ecol. Econ., 41, 393, 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7 Díaz, 2015, The IPBES Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 14, 1, 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002 Döbbelt-Grüne, 2015 Emschergenossenschaft (Ed.) (2009): Flussgebietsplan Emscher, 2009. Essen. Emschergenossenschaft (Ed.) (2013): Fließgewässer im Emscherraum. Essen. European Commission (2014): Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. Economic appraisal tool for Cohesion Policy, 2014-2020. DOI: 10.2776/97516. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/cba_guide.pdf. European Commission, 2011 Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. Official Journal 22 December 2000 L 327/1. European Commission, Brussels. Gerner, N., Nafo, I., Birk, S., Winking, C., Wortberg, T. et al. & Niemann, A. (2016): D13.1: Quantified ESS for 3 mature sites including recommendations for application. Part 2- Emscher case. FP7 project DESSIN. Available online at https://dessin-project.eu/?page_id=2050. Gohrbrandt, T., Neumeyer, H.-P., Kruse, S., Schulz, K., Bohnet, M., Steinberg, G., Törkel, D., Wagener, M. T. (2005): Phoenix-Ost – Freizeitnutzung am PhoenixSee, Planungsunteralgen der Planungsgemeinschaft dortmund-project (non-public municipal planning document about the recreational activities at Lake Phoenix). Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M. (2013): Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M. (2010): The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In Raffaelli, D. G., Frid, C. L. J. (Eds.): Ecosystem ecology. A new synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (BES Ecological Reviews Series). Hanley, 2009 Hecht, D., Karl, H., Werbeck, N. (2015): Umsetzung der Wasserrahmenrichtlinie an der Unteren Wupper. Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse am Beispiel der Wärmebelastung. Edited by RUFIS. Bochum. Beiträge zur Ballungsraumforschung, 15. Hydrotec, 2004 Jax, 2013, Ecosystem services and ethics, Ecological Economics, 93, 260, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.008 Kelemen, E., García-Llorente, M., Pataki, G., Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2014): Non-monetary techniques for the valuation of ecosystem service. In: Potschin, M., Jax, K. (eds): OpenNESS Reference Book. EC FP7 Grant Agreement no. 308428. Available via: www.openness-project.eu/library/reference-book. Korte, C. and Wollrath, U. (2014): Gewerbemietpreisspiegel 2014/2014, Mietpreisspiegel für Gewerbeimmobilien in der Region Dortmund, Hamm, Kreis Unna, Industrie- und Handelskammer zu Dortmund (market overview of rents for commercial properties from the regional chamber of commerce and industry in the city of Dortmund). Kupilas, 2016, Hydromorphological restoration stimulates river ecosystem metabolism, Biogeosciences Discuss., 1, 10.5194/bg-2016-431 Landers, D., Nahlik, A. (2013): Final Ecosystem Goods and Services Classification System (FEGS-CS). EPA/600/R-13/ORD-004914. Edited by US EPA. Office of Research and Development. Washington, D.C. LfW Bayern (Bayerisches Landesamt für Wasserwirtschaft) (n.d.): Schadensfunktionen und -kollektive aus der HOWAS-Datenbank, Computerlisten und Einzelwerte, München. Maes, 2018, Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: An analytical framework for ecosystem condition, Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Maes, 2016, An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, Ecosystem Services, 17, 14, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023 Maseyk, 2017, Managing natural capital stocks for the provision of ecosystem services, Conservation Letters, 10, 211, 10.1111/conl.12242 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005): Ecosystems and human well-being. Wetlands and water synthesis: a report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Müller, 2012, The indicator side of ecosystem services, Ecosystem Services, 1, 26, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.001 Niemann, A. (2001): Schädigung des hyporheischen Interstitials kleiner Fließgewässer durch Niederschlagswassereinleitungen. Zugl.: University of Essen, Dissertation, 2001. Aachen: Shaker. Forum Siedlungswasserwirtschaft und Abfallwirtschaft Universität GH Essen 15. Pearce, 2006 Ruhr, 2005 Radschlag, IGS (2013): Bericht zum Projekt Radverkehrsanalyse auf der Römer-Lippe-Route. Radschlag – Büro für Tourismus und Radverkehr, IGS – Ingenieurgesellschaft Stolz mbH Verkehrsplanung und Beratung. Rolauffs, 2003, Leitbildorientierte biologische Fließgewässerbewertung zur Charakterisierung des Sauerstoffhaushaltes, Umweltbundesamt Texte, 11, 1 Ruhrnachrichten (2014): Alle Infos zum Wassersport am Phoenix-See (online news with market data related to boat sport at Lake Pheonix), Available online via https://www.ruhrnachrichten.de/Staedte/Dortmund/Alle-Infos-zum-Wassersport-am-Phoenix-See-420617.html, accessed in March 2016. Scholz, M., Mehl, D., Schulz-Zunkel, C., Kasperidus, H. D., Born, W., Henle, K. (2012): Ökosystemfunktionen von Flussauen. Analyse und Bewertung von Hochwasserretention, Nährstoffrückhalt, Kohlenstoffvorrat, Treibhausgasemissionen und Habitatfunktion. Ergebnisse des F+E-Vorhabens (FKZ 3508 850 100). Bonn-Bad Godesberg: Bundesamt für Naturschutz. Naturschutz und biologische Vielfalt 124. Schulz, 2003, The influence of macrophytes on sedimentation and nutrient retention in the lower River Spree (Germany), Water Research, 37, 569, 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00276-2 Semrau, M., Junghardt, S., Sommerhäuser, M. (2011): Die Erfolgskontrolle renaturierter Schmutzwasserläufe – Monitoringkonzept, Erfahrungen und Messergebnisse aus dem Emscher- und Lippegebiet, in Jähnig, S., Hering, D., Sommerhäuser, M. (Hrsg.): Fließgewässer-Renaturierung heute und morgen. Wasserrahmenrichtlinie, Maßnahmen und Effizienzkontrolle. Limnologie aktuell 13, Stuttgart (Schweizerbart), pp. 83–102. Semrau, M., Reuther, S., Hurck, R. (2007): Entwicklungschancen der Gewässer im Emschergebiet - Grundlage für einen effizienten Mitteleinsatz. Wasser und Abfall 6. Seppelt, 2011, A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies. Approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead, Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 630, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x Silvertown, 2015, Have Ecosystem Services Been Oversold?, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30, 641, 10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.007 Smeets, 1999 Statista.com (2016): Online research for restaurants at Lake Phoenix, Available online via https://de.statista.com, accessed in March 2016. UK National Ecosystem Assessment, 2011 Vallentin, D., Scheck, H. (2013): Emscher 3.0 — on the way to blue infrastructures. In Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie GmbH (Ed.): Emscher 3.0 From grey to blue – Or, how the sky over the Ruhr region fell into the Emscher. Bönen: DruckVerlag Kettler. pp. 10-29. Vermaat, 2015, Assessing the societal benefits of river restoration using the ecosystem services approach, Hydrobiologia, 769, 121, 10.1007/s10750-015-2482-z Winking, 2016, Start at zero: succession of benthic invertebrate assemblages in restored former sewage channels, Aquatic Sciences, 78, 683, 10.1007/s00027-015-0459-7 Wohnungsboerse.net (2016): Mietspiegel Dortmund (Rental price overview for the city of Dortmund, online real estate database), Available online via https://www.wohnungsboerse.net/mietspiegel-Dortmund/5209, accessed at 14th of March 2016.