Laparoscopic Treatment of Hydrosalpinx: Factors Affecting Pregnancy Rate

Spiros D. Milingos1, George K. Kallipolitis1, Dimitris C. Loutradis1, Anthoula G. Liapi1, Elsheikh A. Hassan1, Constantinos G. Mavrommatis1, Spiros G. Miaris1, Stelios P. Michalas1
1First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Athens, “Alexandra” Maternity Hospital Athens, Greece.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Milingos, 1993, Infertility from tubal disease. Microsurgery or IVF, Adolesc Gynecol Reprod Menopause, 5, 28 Hesla, 1997, Laparoscopic management of distal tubal disease, Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 8, 425 Opsahl, 1993, The predictive value of hysterosalpingography for tubal and peritoneal factors, Fertil Steril, 60, 444, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56158-5 Petrozza, 1997, The role of diagnostic laparoscopy in evaluation of infertility, Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 8, 327 Nackley, 1998, The significance of hydro-salpinx in IVF, Fertil Steril, 69, 373 Gomel, 1995, From microsurgery to laparoscopic surgery: A progress, Fertil Steril, 63, 464, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57409-3 Milingos, 1998, Factors affecting postoperative pregnancy rate after endoscopic management of large endometriomata, Int J Gynecol Obstet, 63, 129, 10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00148-9 Mettler, 1990, Pelviscopictubal surgery: The acceptable vogue, Hum Reprod, 5, 971, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137230 Reich, 1987, Laparoscopic treatment of extensive pelvic adhesions, including hydrosalpinx, J Reprod Med, 32, 736 Canis, 1991, Laparoscopic distal tuboplasty: Report of 87 cases and 4-year experience, Fertil Steril, 56, 616, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54589-0 Dubuisson, 1994, Laparoscopic salpingostomy: Fertility results according to the tubal mucosal appearance, Hum Reprod, 9, 334, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138503 McComb, 1991, The intussusception salpingostomy technique for the therapy of distal oviductal occlusion at laparoscopy, Obstet Gynecol, 78, 443 American Fertility Society, 1988, The AFS classification of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions, Fertil Steril, 49, 944, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59942-7 Schlaff, 1990, Neosalpingostomy for distal tubal obstruction: Prognostic factors and impact of surgical technique, Fertil Steril, 54, 984, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53991-0 Singhal, 1991, An analysis of factors influencing the outcome of 232 consecutive tubal microsurgery cases, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 98, 628, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13447.x Benadiva, 1995, In vitro fertilization versus tubal surgery: Is pelvic reconstructive surgery obsolete, Fertil Steril, 64, 1051, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57958-8 Strandell, 1995, Background factors and scoring systems in relation to pregnancy outcome after fertility surgery, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 74, 281, 10.3109/00016349509024450 Winston, 1991, Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 98, 637, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13448.x Donnez, 1989, CO2 laser laparoscopy in infertile women with adnexal adhesions and women with tubal occlusion, J Gynecol Surg, 5, 47, 10.1089/gyn.1989.5.47 Rock, 1978, Factors influencing the success of salpingostomy techniques for distal fimbrial obstruction, Obstet Gynecol, 52, 591 Mage, 1986, A preoperative classification to predict the intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy rates after distal tubal microsurgery, Fertil Steril, 46, 807, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)49815-8 Marana, 1995, Correlation between the American Fertility Society classification of adnexal adhesions and distal tubal occlusion, salpingoscopy and reproductive outcome in tubal surgery, Fertil Steril, 64, 924, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57903-5 Murray, 1998, The adverse effect of hydrosalpinges on IVF pregnancy rates and the benefit of surgical correction, Fertil Steril, 69, 41, 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00447-0 Granot, 1998, Is hydrosalpinx fluid cytotoxic, Hum Reprod, 13, 1620, 10.1093/humrep/13.6.1620 Wainer, 1997, Does hydrosalpinx reduce the pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization?, Fertil Steril, 68, 1022, 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00405-6 Freeman, 1998, Permanent impairment of embryo development by hydrosalpinges, Hum Reprod, 13, 983, 10.1093/humrep/13.4.983 Sowter, 1997, Is the outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment improved by spontaneous or surgical drainage of a hydrosalpinx?, Hum Reprod, 12, 2147, 10.1093/humrep/12.10.2147 Meyer, 1997, Hydrosalpinges adversely affect markers of endometrial receptivity, Hum Reprod, 12, 1393, 10.1093/humrep/12.7.1393 Zeyneloglu, 1998, Adverse effects of hydrosalpinx on pregnancy rates after IVF-ET, Fertil Steril, 70, 492, 10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00200-3 Strandell, 1998, Hydrosalpinx fluid does not adversely affect the normal development of human embryos and implantation in vitro, Hum Reprod, 13, 2921, 10.1093/humrep/13.10.2921 Dlugi, 1994, Pregnancy rates after operative endoscopic treatment of total distal tubal occlusion, Fertil Steril, 62, 913, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57050-2 Evantash, 1997, Laparoscopy in the management ofpelvic adhesions, Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 8, 383 Fayez, 1989, An assessment of the role of operative laparoscopy in tuboplasty, Fertil Steril, 39, 476, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)46935-9 Dunphy, 1997, Impact of the learning curve on team delivery rates following laparoscopic salpingostomy for infertility associated with distal tubal occlusive disease, Hum Reprod, 12, 1181, 10.1093/humrep/12.6.1181