Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: Techniques, Results and Oncological Outcome in 125 Consecutive Cases

European Urology - Tập 45 - Trang 483-489 - 2004
Andreas H. Wille1, Jan Roigas1, Serdar Deger1, Maximilian Tüllmann1, Ingolf Türk2, Stefan A. Loening1
1Department of Urology, University Hospital Charité, Humboldt-University Berlin, Schumannstr. 20/21, 10117 Berlin, Germany
2Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Clayman, 1991, Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report, J. Urol., 146, 278, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37770-4 Cicco, 2001, Results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, J. Endourol., 15, 355, 10.1089/089277901300189349 Dunn, 2000, Laparoscopic vs. open radical nephrectomy: a 9 year experience, J. Urol., 164, 1153, 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67131-5 Gill, 2001, Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients, Cancer, 92, 1843, 10.1002/1097-0142(20011001)92:7<1843::AID-CNCR1701>3.0.CO;2-W Ono, 2001, The long-term outcome of laparoscopic radiacal nephrectomy for small renal cell carcinoma, J. Urol., 165, 1257 Portis, 2001, Laparoscopic radical/total nephrectomy: a decade of progress, J. Endourol., 15, 345, 10.1089/089277901300189330 Portis, 2002, Long-term followup after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, J. Urol., 167, 1257, 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65277-9 Wille, 2003, Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy–indications, technique, and oncological outcome, Urologe [A], 42, 205, 10.1007/s00120-002-0276-1 Janetschek, 2000, Laparoscopic surgery in urology, Curr. Opin. Urol., 10, 351, 10.1097/00042307-200007000-00010 Janetschek, 2000, Laparoscopic surgery for stage T1 renal cell carcinoma: radical nephrectomy and wedge resection, Eur. Urol., 38, 131, 10.1159/000020269 Buerschaper G. Stellenwert der Lymphadenektomie und Notwendigkeit der Adrenalektomie bei der transperitonealen Tumornephrektomie des Nierenzellkarzinoms. Dissertationsschrift, Medizinische Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2000. Doublet, 2000, Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy is safe and effective in obese patients: a comparative study of 55 procedures, Urology, 56, 63, 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00533-1 Batler, 2001, Hand-assisted vs. retroperitoneal laparocopic nephrectomy, J. Endourol., 15, 899, 10.1089/089277901753284107 Nelson, 2002, Comparison of hand assisted versus standard laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for suspected renal cell carcinoma, J. Urol., 167, 1989, 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65070-7 Fentie, 2000, Metastatic renal cell cancer after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Long term follow-up, J. Endourol., 14, 407, 10.1089/end.2000.14.407 Rabban, 2001, Kidney morcellation in laparoscopic nephrectomy for tumor, Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 25, 1158, 10.1097/00000478-200109000-00006 Gettman, 2002, Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Prospective assessment of impact of intact versus fragmented specimen removal on postoperative quality of life, J. Endourol., 16, 23, 10.1089/089277902753483673 Soulie, 2000, Urological complications of laparoscopic surgery: Experience with 350 procedures at a single center, J. Urol., 165, 1960, 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66250-7 Vallancien, 2002, Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: Review of 1,311 procedures at a single center, J. Urol., 168, 23, 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64823-9 Marshall FF. When is open nephrectomy preferred? AUA-news, September/October 2002. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Willkins; 2002. p. 10.