Language and Reading: the Role of Morpheme and Phoneme Awareness
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Tunmer WE, Herriman ML, Nesdale AR. Metalinguistic abilities and beginning reading. Read Res Q. 1988;23(2):134–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/747799 .
Colé P, Duncan LG, Blaye A. Cognitive flexibility predicts early reading skills. Front Psychol. 2014;5:565. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00565 .
•• Dehaene S, Cohen L, Morais J, Kolinsky R. Illiterate to literate: behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16(4):234–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3924 . An important review of the effects of literacy on the interface between the vision and language systems in the brain.
Gombert JE. Metalinguistic development. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1992.
Duncan LG, Seymour PHK, Hill S. How important are rhyme and analogy in beginning reading? Cognition. 1997;63(2):171–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00001-2 .
Walley AC. The role of vocabulary development in children’s spoken word recognition and segmentation ability. Dev Rev. 1993;13(3):286–350. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1993.1015 .
Metsala JL, Walley AC. Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In: Metsala JL, Ehri LC, editors. Word recognition in beginning literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1998. p. 89–120.
Fowler AE. How early phonological development might set the stage for phoneme awareness. In: Brady SA, Shankweiler DP, editors. Phonological processes in literacy: a tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1991.
Walley AC, Metsala JL, Garlock VM. Spoken vocabulary growth: its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability. Read Writ. 2003;16(1–2):5–20. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021789804977 .
Bruce DJ. The analysis of word sounds by young children. Br J Educ Psychol. 1964;34(2):158–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1964.tb00620.x .
Liberman IY, Shankweiler D, Fischer FW, Carter B. Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. J Exp Child Psychol. 1974;18(2):201–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(74)90101-5 .
Goswami U, Bryant PE. Phonological skills and learning to read. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1990.
Kirtley C, Bryant PE, MacLean M, Bradley L. Rhyme, rime, and the onset of reading. J Exp Child Psychol. 1989;48(2):224–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(89)90004-0 .
Treiman R, Zukowski A. Levels of phonological awareness. In: Brady SA, Shankweiler DP, editors. Phonological processes in literacy: a tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1991.
Treiman R, Breaux AM. Common phoneme and overall similarity relations among spoken syllables: their use by children and adults. J Psycholinguist Res. 1982;11(6):569–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067613 .
Johnston RS. Developmental deep dyslexia? Cortex. 1983;19(1):133–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(83)80057-4 .
Muter V, Hulme C, Snowling MJ, Stevenson J. Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: evidence from a longitudinal study. Dev Psychol. 2004;40(5):665–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.665 .
•• Melby-Lervåg M, Lyster S-AH, Hulme C. Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2012;138(2):322–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026744 . Meta-analytic evidence that reading progress is more closely related to phoneme awareness than rime awareness or verbal short-term memory across alphabetic orthographies.
•• Castles A, Coltheart M. Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition. 2004;91(1):77–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00164-1 . A critical evaluation of the methodology used in the literature on phonological awareness and reading acquisition to establish the criteria for demonstrating causality.
Perfetti CA, Beck I, Bell L, Hughes C. Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: a longitudinal study of first-grade children. Merrill Palmer Q. 1987;33(3):283–319.
Elkonin DB. U.S.S.R. In: Downing J, editor. Comparative reading. New York: Macmillan; 1973.
Stuart M, Coltheart M. Does reading develop in a sequence of stages? Cognition. 1988;30(2):139–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90038-8 .
Liberman AM. The grammars of speech and language. Cogn Psychol. 1970;1(4):301–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(70)90018-6 .
Liberman AM, Cooper FS, Shankweiler D, Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code. Psychol Rev. 1967;74(6):431–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020279 .
•• Duncan LG, Castro SL, Defior S, Seymour PHK, Baillie S, Genard N, et al. Phonological development, native language and literacy: variations on a theme in six European languages. Cognition. 2013;127(3):398–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.009 . Cross-linguistic evidence of longitudinal changes in the early development of phoneme awareness in relation to both spoken language and reading instruction in six alphabetic orthographies.
Ehri LC, Wilce LS. The influence of orthography on readers’ conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words. Appl Psycholinguist. 1980;1(4):371–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400009802 .
Ziegler JC, Perry C, Jacobs AM, Braun M. Identical words are read differently in different languages. Psychol Sci. 2001;12(5):379–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00370 .
•• Ziegler JC, Goswami U. Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychol Bull. 2005;131(1):3–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3 . An influential theoretical paper which aims to provide an explanation of how typical and atypical readers link phonology and orthography in relation to the transparency of alphabetic orthographies.
Ziegler JC, Bertrand D, Tóth D, Csépe V, Reis A, Faísca L, et al. Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: a cross-language investigation. Psychol Sci. 2010;21(4):551–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363406 .
• Hulme C, Snowling MJ. The interface between spoken and written language: developmental disorders. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2014;369(1634):20120395. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0395 . A review that traces the influence of phoneme awareness in decoding and morpheme awareness in reading comprehension among children with developmental disorders of reading and spoken language.
• White S, Milne E, Rosen S, Hansen P, Swettenham J, Frith U, et al. The role of sensorimotor impairments in dyslexia: a multiple case study of dyslexic children. Dev Sci. 2006;9(3):237–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00483.x . An examination of different sensorimotor skills in developmental dyslexia, which reveals that phonological impairments were the most prevalent and the only measure to correlate with literacy skill.
Saksida A, Iannuzzi S, Bogliotti C, Chaix Y, Démonet JF, Bricout L, et al. Phonological skills, visual attention span, and visual stress in developmental dyslexia: insights from a population of French children. Dev Psychol. 2016;52(10):1503–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000184 .
Bowyer-Crane C, Snowling MJ, Duff F, Fieldsend E, Carroll J, Miles J, et al. Improving early language and literacy skills: differential effects of an oral language versus a phonology with reading intervention. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008;49(4):422–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01849.x .
•• Landerl K, Ramus F, Moll K, Lyytinen H, Leppänen PHT, Lohvansuu K, et al. Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying complexity. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2013; 54(6): 686–694. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12029 . Phoneme awareness is shown to be a concurrent predictor of developmental dyslexia across six alphabetic orthographies, most especially in opaque orthographies.
Vandermosten M, Boets B, Poelmans H, Sunaert S, Wouters J, Ghesquière P. A tractography study in dyslexia: neuroanatomic correlates of orthographic, phonological and speech processing. Brain. 2012;135(3):935–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr363 .
Mahony D, Singson M, Mann V. Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Read Writ. 2000;12(3):191–218. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008136012492 .
Berko J. The child’s learning of English morphology. Word. 1958;14(2–3):150–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1958.11659661 .
Casalis S, Louis-Alexandre MF. Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: a longitudinal study. Read Writ. 2000;12(3):303–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008177205648 .
• Duncan LG, Casalis S, Colé P. Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: observations from a comparison of English and French. Appl Psycholinguist. 2009;30(3):405–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716409090213 . Cross linguistic evidence of accelerated development of morpheme awareness in French relative to English during early schooling, consistent with the higher productivity of derivational morphology in French.
Nunes T, Bryant P, Bindman M. Morphological spelling strategies: developmental stages and processes. Dev Psychol. 1997;33(4):637–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.4.637 .
Fejzo A, Desrochers A, Deacon SH. The acquisition of derivational morphology in children. In: Berthiaume R, Daigle D, Desrochers A, editors. Morphological processing and literacy development: current issues and research. New York: Routledge; 2018.
Carlisle JF, Nomanbhoy DM. Phonological and morphological awareness in 1st-graders. Appl Psycholinguist. 1993;14(2):177–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400009541 .
Shankweiler D, Crain S, Katz L, Fowler AE, Liberman AE, Brady SA, et al. Cognitive profiles of reading-disabled children: comparison of language skills in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Psychol Sci. 1995;6(3):149–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00324.x .
• Kirby JR, Deacon SH, Bowers PN, Izenberg L, Wade-Woolley L, Parrila R. Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Read Writ. 2012;25(2):389–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5 . A longitudinal investigation revealing a role for morpheme awareness in early word reading and reading comprehension over and above phonological awareness.
Deacon SH, Kirby JR. Morphological awareness: just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Appl Psycholinguist. 2004;25(2):223–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001110 .
•• Goodwin AP, Ahn S. A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children. Sci Stud Read. 2013;17(4):257–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2012.689791 . Meta-analytic evidence that the strongest effects of morphological instruction are observed in decoding, phonological awareness and morphological knowledge.
• Beyersmann E, Grainger J, Casalis S, Ziegler JC. Effects of reading proficiency on embedded stem priming in primary school children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2015;139:115–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.06.001 . Masked morphological priming with lexical decision reveals embedded stem activation but not morpho-orthographic priming among primary school children.
• Deacon SH, Francis KA. How children become sensitive to the morphological structure of the words that they read. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1469. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01469 . This study indicates that base frequency has an important role in the development of morphemic sensitivity in children’s derived word reading.
Kearns DM. How elementary-age children read polysyllabic polymorphemic words. J Educ Psychol. 2015;107(2):364–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037518 .
Anglin JM. Vocabulary development: a morphological analysis. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1993;58(10):1–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.1993.tb00366.x .
Nation K, Cocksey J. Beginning readers activate semantics from sub-word orthography. Cognition. 2009;110(2):273–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.004 .
Carlisle JF. Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: impact on reading. Read Writ. 2000;12(3):169–90. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008131926604 .
Deacon SH, Tong X, Francis K. The relationship of morphological analysis and morphological decoding to reading comprehension. J Res Read. 2017;40(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12056 .
•• Levesque KC, Kieffer MJ, Deacon SH. Morphological awareness and reading comprehension: examining mediating factors. J Exp Child Psychol. 2017;160:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.015 . Multivariate path analyses reveal a direct influence from morpheme awareness to reading comprehension among third-graders as well as indirect paths mediated by morphological decoding and analysis.
Ehri LC. Learning to read words: theory, findings, and issues. Sci Stud Read. 2005;9(2):167–88. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4 .
• Deacon SH, Benere J, Pasquarella A. Reciprocal relationship: children’s morphological awareness and their reading accuracy across grades 2 to 3. Dev Psychol. 2013;49(6):1113–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029474 . Longitudinal evidence of a bidirectional relationship between morpheme awareness and reading accuracy in early schooling.
Duncan LG, Traficante D, Wilson MA, editors. Word morphology and written language acquisition: insights from typical and atypical development in different orthographies. Frontiers in psychology research topic: 2017. https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/5370 .
Duncan LG. A cross-linguistic analysis of the role of morphology in reading development. In: Berthiaume R, Daigle D, Desrochers A, editors. Morphological processing and literacy development: current issues and research. New York: Routledge; 2018.
• Colé P, Bouton S, Leuwers C, Casalis S, Sprenger-Charolles L. Stem and derivational-suffix processing during reading by French second and third graders. Appl Psycholinguist. 2012;33(1):97–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000282 . Experimental evidence from young French children for the use of morphemes (stems and derivational suffices) in identifying novel and low frequency words.
• Casalis S, Quémart P, Duncan LG. How language affects children’s use of derivational morphology in visual word and pseudoword processing: evidence from a cross-language study. Front Psychol. 2015;6:452. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00452 . A cross-linguistic study revealing more efficient morphological processing by young readers of French than English.
Zhang J, Anderson R, Wang Q, Packard J, Wu X, Tang S, et al. Insight into the structure of compound words among speakers of Chinese and English. Appl Psycholinguist. 2012;33(4):753–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000555 .
• Pan J, Song S, Su M, McBride C, Liu H, Zhang Y, et al. On the relationship between phonological awareness, morphological awareness and Chinese literacy skills: evidence from an 8-year longitudinal study. Dev Sci. 2016;19(6):982–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12356 . A longitudinal study showing an association between early syllable awareness and later morpheme awareness and reading in Chinese reflecting the units encoded by the orthography.
•• McBride CA. Is Chinese special? Four aspects of Chinese literacy acquisition that might distinguish learning Chinese from learning alphabetic orthographies. Educ Psychol Rev. 2016;28(3):523–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9318-2 . An important review of how reading acquisition differs between Chinese and alphabetic orthographies under the influence of features such as semantic radicals and lexical compounding.
•• Deacon SH, Tong X, Mimeau C. Morphological and semantic processing in developmental dyslexia across languages: a theoretical and empirical review. In: Perfetti C, Verhoeven L, editors. Dyslexia across languages and writing systems: a handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016. A critical empirical and theoretical review of evidence that morpheme awareness might provide a compensatory mechanism in developmental dyslexia.
• Elbro C, Arnbak E. The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Ann Dyslexia. 1996;46(1):209–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648177 . A classic study presenting evidence that adolescents with developmental dyslexia process morphemes in reading words and text.
Cavalli E, Duncan LG, Elbro C, El Ahmadi A, Colé P. Phonemic—morphemic dissociation in university students with dyslexia: an index of reading compensation? Ann Dyslexia. 2017;67(1):63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-016-0138-y .
• Lei L, Pan J, Liu H, McBride-Chang C, Li H, Zhang Y, et al. Developmental trajectories of reading development and impairment from ages 3 to 8 years in Chinese children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011;52(2):212–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02311.x . Longitudinal evidence that early morpheme awareness is a predictor of later reading difficulties in Chinese.
Su M, Zhao J, Thiebaut de Schotten M, Zho W, Gong G, Ramus F, et al. Alterations in white matter pathways underlying phonological and morphological processing in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018;31:11–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.002 .
Perfetti CA, Hart L. The lexical quality hypothesis. In: Verhoeven L, Elbro C, Reitsma P, editors. Precursors of functional literacy. Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins; 2002.
Perfetti CA. Reading ability: lexical quality to comprehension. Sci Stud Read. 2007;11:357–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730 .
•• Frost R. Towards a universal model of reading. Behav Brain Sci. 2012;35(5):263–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11001841Published . A comprehensive review of empirical findings about reading in different orthographies which culminates in a discussion of the linguistic dimensions of a universal model of reading.