Landscape controls on fuel moisture variability in fire-prone heathland and peatland landscapes

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - 2024
Kerryn Little1, Laura J Graham1,2, Mike Flannigan3, Claire M Belcher4, Nicholas Kettridge1
1School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
2Biodiversity, Ecology and Conservation Group, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Vienna, Austria
3Department of Natural Resource Science, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, Canada
4wildFIRE Lab, Hatherly Laboratories, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

Tóm tắt

Cross-landscape fuel moisture content is highly variable but not considered in existing fire danger assessments. Capturing fuel moisture complexity and its associated controls is critical for understanding wildfire behavior and danger in emerging fire-prone environments that are influenced by local heterogeneity. This is particularly true for temperate heathland and peatland landscapes that exhibit spatial differences in the vulnerability of their globally important carbon stores to wildfire. Here we quantified the range of variability in the live and dead fuel moisture of Calluna vulgaris across a temperate fire-prone landscape through an intensive fuel moisture sampling campaign conducted in the North Yorkshire Moors, UK. We also evaluated the landscape (soil texture, canopy age, aspect, and slope) and micrometeorological (temperature, relative humidity, vapor pressure deficit, and windspeed) drivers of landscape fuel moisture variability for temperate heathlands and peatlands for the first time. We observed high cross-landscape fuel moisture variation, which created a spatial discontinuity in the availability of live fuels for wildfire spread (fuel moisture < 65%) and vulnerability of the organic layer to smoldering combustion (fuel moisture < 250%). This heterogeneity was most important in spring, which is also the peak wildfire season in these temperate ecosystems. Landscape and micrometeorological factors explained up to 72% of spatial fuel moisture variation and were season- and fuel-layer-dependent. Landscape factors predominantly controlled spatial fuel moisture content beyond modifying local micrometeorology. Accounting for direct landscape–fuel moisture relationships could improve fuel moisture estimates, as existing estimates derived solely from micrometeorological observations will exclude the underlying influence of landscape characteristics. We hypothesize that differences in soil texture, canopy age, and aspect play important roles across the fuel layers examined, with the main differences in processes arising between live, dead, and surface/ground fuels. We also highlight the critical role of fuel phenology in assessing landscape fuel moisture variations in temperate environments. Understanding the mechanisms driving fuel moisture variability opens opportunities to develop locally robust fuel models for input into wildfire danger rating systems, adding versatility to wildfire danger assessments as a management tool.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Arnell, N.W., A. Freeman, and R. Gazzard. 2021. The effect of climate change on indicators of fire danger in the UK. Environmental Research Letters 16: 044027.

Bannister, P. 1964a. Stomatal responses of heath plants to water deficits. Journal of Ecology 52: 151–158.

Bannister, P. 1964. The water relations of certain heath plants with reference to their ecological amplitude: III. Experimental studies: General conclusions. The Journal of Ecology 52: 499.

Batjes, N.H. 1996. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. European Journal of Soil Science 47: 151–163.

Belcher, et al. 2021. UK wildfires and their climate challenges. Expert Led Report Prepared for the third Climate Change Risk Assessment. https://www.ukclimaterisk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/UK-Wildfires-and-their-Climate-Challenges.pdf.

Brown, T.P., Z.H. Hoylman, E. Conrad, Z. Holden, K. Jencso, and W.M. Jolly. 2022. Decoupling between soil moisture and biomass drives seasonal variations in live fuel moisture across co-occurring plant functional types. Fire ecol 18: 14.

Brown, T.P., A. Inbar, T.J. Duff, P.N.J. Lane, and G.J. Sheridan. 2022b. The sensitivity of fuel moisture to forest structure effects on microclimate. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 316: 108857.

Cardíl, A., V.M. Tapia, S. Monedero, T. Quiñones, K. Little, C.R. Stoof, J. Ramirez, and de-Miguel S,. 2023. Characterizing the rate of spread of large wildfires in emerging fire environments of northwestern Europe using Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite active fire data. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 23: 361–373.

Davies, G.M., R. Domènech, A. Gray, and P.C.D. Johnson. 2016. Vegetation structure and fire weather influence variation in burn severity and fuel consumption during peatland wildfires. Biogeosciences 13: 389–398.

Davies, G.M., and A. Gray. 2015. Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution 5: 5295–5304.

Davies, G.M., and C.J. Legg. 2008. Developing a live fuel moisture model for moorland fire danger rating. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 119: 225–236.

Davies, G.M., and C.J. Legg. 2011. Fuel moisture thresholds in the flammability of Calluna vulgaris. Fire Technology 47: 421–436.

Davies, G.M., and C.J. Legg. 2016. Regional variation in fire weather controls the reported occurrence of Scottish wildfires. PeerJ 4: 25.

Davies, G.M., C.J. Legg, R. O’Hara, A.J. MacDonald, and A.A. Smith. 2010. Winter desiccation and rapid changes in the live fuel moisture content of Calluna vulgaris. Plant Ecology and Diversity 3: 289–299.

Dickman, L.T., A.K. Jonko, R.R. Linn, I. Altintas, A.L. Atchley, A. Bär, A.D. Collins, J.-L. Dupuy, M.R. Gallagher, J.K. Hiers, C.M. Hoffman, S.M. Hood, M.D. Hurteau, W.M. Jolly, A. Josephson, E.L. Loudermilk, W. Ma, S.T. Michaletz, R.H. Nolan, J.J. O’Brien, R.A. Parsons, R. Partelli-Feltrin, F. Pimont, V. Resco de Dios, J. Restaino, Z.J. Robbins, K.A. Sartor, E. Schultz-Fellenz, S.P. Serbin, S. Sevanto, J.K. Shuman, C.H. Sieg, N.S. Skowronski, D.R. Weise, M. Wright, C. Xu, M. Yebra, and N. Younes. 2023. Integrating plant physiology into simulation of fire behavior and effects. New Phytologist 238: 952–970.

Duane, A., M.D. Miranda, and L. Brotons. 2021. Forest connectivity percolation thresholds for fire spread under different weather conditions. Forest Ecology and Management 498: 119558.

Duursma, R.A. 2015. Plantecophys - an R package for analysing and modelling leaf gas exchange data. PLoS ONE 10: e0143346.

Easton, Z.M., and E. Bock. 2016. Soil and Soil Water Relationships. Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia State University. Petersburg: Publication BSE-194P, 9.

Farewell, T.S., Truckell, I.G., Keay, C.A., and S.H. Hallett. 2011. The derivation and application of Soilscapes: Soil and environmental datasets from the National Soil Resources Institute, Cranfield University Online: https://www.cranfield.ac.uk/themes/environment-and-agrifood/landis/soilscapes#.

Fernandes, P.M., W.R. Catchpole, and F.C. Rego. 2000. Shrubland fire behaviour modelling with microplot data. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 889–899.

Finney, M.A., McAllister, S.S., Grumstrup, T.P. and J.M. Forthofer. 2021. Wildland Fire Behaviour (CSIRO Publishing) Online: https://ebooks.publish.csiro.au/content/9781486309092/9781486309092.

Gardner, R.H., B.T. Milne, M.G. Turnei, and R.V. O’Neill. 1987. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1: 19–28.

Gimingham, C.H. 1992. The Lowland Heathland Management Handbook (English Nature) Online: https://books.google.ca/books?id=jGZRPQAACAAJ.

Gimingham, C.H., S.B. Chapman, and N.R. Webb. 1979. European Heathlands Heathlands and related shrublands Ecosystems of the world ed R L Specht, 365–413 (Amsterdam ; New York : New York: Elsevier).

Glaves, D.J., A.J. Crowle, C. Bruemmer, and S.A. Lenaghan. 2020. The causes and prevention of wildfire on heathlands and peatlands in England (NEER014) (Peterborough).

Grau-Andrés, R., G.M. Davies, A. Gray, E.M. Scott, and S. Waldron. 2018. Fire severity is more sensitive to low fuel moisture content on Calluna heathlands than on peat bogs. Science of the Total Environment 616–617: 1261–1269.

Griebel, A., M.M. Boer, C. Blackman, B. Choat, D.S. Ellsworth, P. Madden, B. Medlyn, V. Resco de Dios, A. Wujeska-Klause, M. Yebra, N. Younes Cardenas, and R.H. Nolan. 2023. Specific leaf area and vapour pressure deficit control live fuel moisture content. Functional Ecology 37: 719–731.

Grotenhuis, M., B. Pelzer., R. Eisinga., et al. 2017. When size matters: advantages of weighted effect coding in observational studies. International Journal of Public Health 62: 163–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-016-0901-1.

Hartig, F. 2022. DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-Level / Mixed) Regression Models Online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa.

Hokanson, K.J., M.C. Lukenbach, K.J. Devito, N. Kettridge, R.M. Petrone, and J.M. Waddington. 2016. Groundwater connectivity controls peat burn severity in the boreal plains. Ecohydrology 9: 574–584.

Kirkland, M., P.W. Atkinson, J.W. Pearce-Higgins, M.C. de Jong, T.P.F. Dowling, D. Grummo, M. Critchley, and A. Ashton-Butt. 2023. Landscape fires disproportionally affect high conservation value temperate peatlands, meadows, and deciduous forests, but only under low moisture conditions. Science of the Total Environment 884: 163849.

Little, K., L.J. Graham, and N. Kettridge. 2024. Accounting for among-sampler variability improves confidence in fuel moisture content field measurements. International Journal of Wildland Fire 33: WF23078. https://www.publish.csiro.au/wf/WF23078.

Log, T. 2020. Modeling drying of degenerated Calluna vulgaris for wildfire and prescribed burning risk assessment. Forests 11: 759.

Lukenbach, M.C., K.J. Hokanson, P.A. Moore, K.J. Devito, N. Kettridge, D.K. Thompson, B.M. Wotton, R.M. Petrone, and J.M. Waddington. 2015. Hydrological controls on deep burning in a northern forested peatland. Hydrological Processes 29: 4114–4124.

Matthews, S. 2014. Dead fuel moisture research: 1991–2012. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23: 78–92.

Matthews, S., Sauvage, S., Grootemaat, S., Hollis, J., Kenny, B., and P. Fox-Hughes. 2019. Implementation of models and the forecast system for the Australian Fire Danger Rating System. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332900268_Implementation_of_models_and_the_forecast_system_for_the_Australian_Fire_Danger_Rating_System.

Mickler, R.A. 2021. Carbon emissions from a temperate coastal peatland wildfire: Contributions from natural plant communities and organic soils. Carbon Balance and Management 16: 26.

Nakagawa, S., and H. Schielzeth. 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol. 4: 133–42 ed R B O’Hara.

Natural Resources Canada. 2021. An overview of the next generation of the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System. Information Report GLC-X-26. Online: http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/publications?id=40474.

Nolan, R.H., B. Foster, A. Griebel, B. Choat, B.E. Medlyn, M. Yebra, N. Younes, and M.M. Boer. 2022. Drought-related leaf functional traits control spatial and temporal dynamics of live fuel moisture content. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 319: 108941.

Norum, R.A., and M. Miller. 1984. Measuring fuel moisture content in Alaska: Standard methods and protocols. General Technical Report 1–40.

Nyman, P., C.C. Baillie, T.J. Duff, and G.J. Sheridan. 2018. Eco-hydrological controls on microclimate and surface fuel evaporation in complex terrain. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 252: 49–61.

Nyman, P., D. Metzen, P.J. Noske, P.N.J. Lane, and G.J. Sheridan. 2015. Quantifying the effects of topographic aspect on water content and temperature in fine surface fuel. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24: 1129–1142.

Nyman, P., C.B. Sherwin, C. Langhans, P.N.J. Lane, and G.J. Sheridan. 2014. Downscaling regional climate data to calculate the radiative index of dryness in complex terrain. Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Journal 64: 109–122.

Ordnance S. 2019. OS Terrain® 50 DTM Online: https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/business-government/products/terrain-50.

Page, S.E., and A.J. Baird. 2016. Peatlands and global change: Response and resilience. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41: 35–57.

R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing) Online: https://www.R-project.org/.

Rahimi, E., and A. Salman Mahini. 2018. Percolation theory and its applications in landscape ecology. Environmental Researches 9: 47–61.

Rao, K., A.P. Williams, N.S. Diffenbaugh, M. Yebra, and A.G. Konings. 2022. Plant-water sensitivity regulates wildfire vulnerability. Nat Ecol Evol 6: 332–9.

Ruffault, J., Limousin, J.M., Pimont, F., Dupuy, J.L., De Càceres, M., Cochard, H., Mouillot, F., Blackman, C.J., Torres-Ruiz, J.M., Parsons, R.A., Moreno, M., Delzon, S., Jansen, S., Olioso, A., Choat, B., and N. Martin-StPaul. 2022. Plant hydraulic modelling of leaf and canopy fuel moisture content reveals increasing vulnerability of a Mediterranean forest to wildfires under extreme drought. New Phytologist n/a Online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18614.

S. Kalogirou. 2020. lctools: Local correlation, spatial inequalities, geographically weighted regression and other tools online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lctools.

San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., Schulte, E., Schmuck, G., Camia, A., Strobl, P., Liberta, G., Giovando, C., Boca, R., Sedano, F., Kempeneers, P., McInerney, D., Withmore, C., de Oliveira, S.S., Rodrigues, M., Durrant, T., Corti, P., Oehler, F., Vilar, L., and G. Amatulli. 2012. Comprehensive monitoring of wildfires in Europe: The European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS) Approaches to Managing Disaster - Assessing Hazards, Emergencies and Disaster Impacts ed J Tiefenbacher (InTech) Online: http://www.intechopen.com/books/approaches-to-managing-disaster-assessing-hazards-emergencies-and-disaster-impacts/comprehensive-monitoring-of-wildfires-in-europe-the-european-forest-fire-information-system-effis.

Santana, V.M., and R.H. Marrs. 2014. Flammability properties of British heathland and moorland vegetation: Models for predicting fire ignition. Journal of Environmental Management 139: 88–96.

Scarff, F.R., T. Lenz, A.E. Richards, A.E. Zanne, I.J. Wright, and M. Westoby. 2021. Effects of plant hydraulic traits on the flammability of live fine canopy fuels. Functional Ecology 35: 835–846.

Simmons, I.G. 1990. The mid-Holocene ecological history of the moorlands of England and Wales and its relevance for conservation. Environmental Conservation 17: 61–69.

Slijepcevic, A., W.R. Anderson, S. Matthews, and D.H. Anderson. 2018. An analysis of the effect of aspect and vegetation type on fine fuel moisture content in eucalypt forest. International Journal of Wildland Fire 27: 190–202.

Sweeney, R.E., and E.F. Ulveling. 1972. A transformation for simplifying the interpretation of coefficients of binary variables in regression analysis. The American Statistician 26: 30–32.

Taylor, A., Bruce, M., Britton, A., Owen, I., Gagkas, Z., Pohle, I., Fielding, D., and R. Hadden. 2021. Fire Danger Rating System ( FDRS) Report (The James Hutton Institute). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358820686_Fire_Danger_Rating_System_FDRS_Report.

Thien, S.J. 1979. A flow diagram for teaching texture-by-feel analysis. Journal of Agronomic Education 8: 54–55.

Tromp-van Meerveld, H.J., and J.J. McDonnell. 2006. On the interrelations between topography, soil depth, soil moisture, transpiration rates and species distribution at the hillslope scale. Advances in Water Resources 29: 293–310.

Walsh, S.F., P. Nyman, G.J. Sheridan, C.C. Baillie, K.G. Tolhurst, and T.J. Duff. 2017. Hillslope-scale prediction of terrain and forest canopy effects on temperature and near-surface soil moisture deficit. International Journal of Wildland Fire 26: 191–208.

Wang, X., B.M. Wotton, A.S. Cantin, M.A. Parisien, K. Anderson, B. Moore, and M.D. Flannigan. 2017. cffdrs: An R package for the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System. Ecological Processes 6: 11.

Yu, Z.C. 2012. Northern peatland carbon stocks and dynamics: A review. Biogeosciences 9: 4071–4085.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Thông tin tác giả