Landscape Position Effects on Magnetic Properties of Soils in the Agricultural Land Pechenigy, Ukraine

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 5 - Trang 739-750 - 2021
Oleksandr Menshov1, Oleksandr Kruglov2, Sergiy Vyzhva1, Lidiia Horoshkova3, Paulo Pereira4, Tatiana Pastushenko1, Turgay Dindaroglu5
1Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
2NSC “Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Research N. a. O.N. Sokolovskiy”, Kharkiv, Ukraine
3National University of Kyiv–Mohyla Academy, Kyiv, Ukraine
4Environmental Management Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University Vilnius, Lithuania
5Faculty of Forestry, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam Univ, Kahramanmaras, Turkey

Tóm tắt

Among the greatest challenges facing Ukraine as well as other countries with significant agrarian production are sustainable land management, precision farming, soil erosion, and fertility identification. Soil magnetic susceptibility (MS, χ), as well as other magnetic mineralogical parameters, can be a useful indicator of cropland degradation, soil erosion, and pollution assessment. The objective of this work is to study soil magnetic properties in an agricultural land area located in Pechenigy (Kharkiv region, Ukraine). To study the soil magnetic properties distribution, we performed three soil sections (cuts) in different genetic soil horizons. The sections were developed according to the landscape position. The samples were collected from each horizon, and a total of 39 soil samples were taken for laboratory analysis. The laboratory studies included the measurements and calculation of the MS, frequency dependence of the MS (χfd), anhysteretic MS (χARM), isothermal remanent magnetization (IRM), hysteresis, and thermomagnetic parameters. The results showed that MS differs depending on the depth (genetic horizon) and landscape position (section). The average values for topsoil were 70–80 × 10–8 m3/kg. We observed a decrease in MS for Sections 1 and 3 of the deeper soil layer. In the C horizon, the MS was 3–4 times lower than in the A horizon. The MS values for Section 2 were substantially different from those for Sections 1 and 3. In Section 2, we registered the maximum at a depth of 60–90 cm in the B horizon (80–90 × 10–8 m3/kg). Results of magnetic mineralogical analyses suggested that the origin of magnetite, maghemite, and paramagnetic minerals was mostly associated with the pedogenic process. The magnetic minerals were predominantly in superparamagnetic (SP) and single-domain (SD) state with a grain size of less than 0.2 microns.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Asgari N, Ayoubi S, Demattê JA (2018) Soil drainage assessment by magnetic susceptibility measures in western Iran. Geoderma Reg 13:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-018-0679-0 Ayoubi S, Abazari P, Zeraatpisheh M (2018) Soil great groups discrimination using magnetic susceptibility technique in a semi-arid region, central Iran. Arab J Geosci 11(20):616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3941-4 Barbosa RS, Júnior JM, Barrón V, Martins Filho MV, Siqueira DS, Peluco RG, Silva LS (2019) Prediction and mapping of erodibility factors (USLE and WEPP) by magnetic susceptibility in basalt-derived soils in northeastern São Paulo state, Brazil. Environ Earth Sci 78(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-8015-0 Bartington Instruments, L.T.D (1999) Operation manual for MS2 magnetic susceptibility system. England. Available at http://www.bartington. com Boincean B, Dent D (2019) Farming the Black Earth: Sustainable and climate-smart management of Chernozem soils. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22533-9 Byrne JM, Yang M (2016) Spatial variability of soil magnetic susceptibility, organic carbon and total nitrogen from farmland in northern China. CATENA 145:92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.05.025 Chiti T, Certini G, Marzaioli F, D’Acqui LP, Forte C, Castaldi S, Valentini R (2019) Composition and turnover time of organic matter in soil fractions with different magnetic susceptibility. Geoderma 349:88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.04.042 D’Emilio M, Coluzzi R, Macchiato M, Imbrenda V, Ragosta M, Sabia S, Simoniello T (2018) Satellite data and soil magnetic susceptibility measurements for heavy metals monitoring: findings from Agri Valley (Southern Italy). Environ Earth Sci 77(3):63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7206-4 de Mello DC, Demattê JA, Silvero NE, Di Raimo LA, Poppiel RR, Mello FA, Rizzo R (2020) Soil magnetic susceptibility and its relationship with naturally occurring processes and soil attributes in pedosphere, in a tropical environment. Geoderma 372:114364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114364 Dearing JA, Bird PM, Dann RJL, Benjamin SF (1997) Secondary ferrimagnetic minerals in Welsh soils: a comparison of mineral magnetic detection methods and implications for mineral formation. Geophys J Int 130(3):727–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb01867.x Ding Z, Zhang Z, Li Y, Zhan L, Zhang K (2020) Characteristics of magnetic susceptibility on cropland and pastureland slopes in an area influenced by both wind and water erosion and implications for soil redistribution patterns. Soil Tillage Res 199:104568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104568 Evans M, Heller F (2003) Environmental magnetism: principles and applications of enviromagnetics. Elsevier Fattakhova LA, Shcherbakov VP, Kuzina DM (2020) Petromagnetic properties of fallow soils as an indicator of the organic matter content. Geophys Process Biosphere 19(1):51–65. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433820070026 Fileccia T, Guadagni M, Hovhera V, Bernoux M (2014) Ukraine: Soil fertility to strengthen climate resilience. FAO, Rome Gholamzadeh M, Ayoubi S, Shahrivar FS (2019) Using magnetic susceptibility measurements to differentiate soil drainage classes in central Iran. Stud Geophys Geod 63(3):465–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-018-0679-0 Górka-Kostrubiec B, Teisseyre-Jeleńska M, Dytłow SK (2016) Magnetic properties as indicators of Chernozem soil development. CATENA 138:91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.11.014 Gubrin YL (1972) Geomorphological zoning Ukraine and Moldova. Moscow Science 62–68 (in Russian) Hanesch M, Scholger R (2005) The influence of soil type on the magnetic susceptibility measured throughout soil profiles. Geophys J Int 161:50–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02577.x Jakšík O, Kodešová R, Kapička A, Klement A, Fer M, Nikodem A (2016) Using magnetic susceptibility mapping for assessing soil degradation due to water erosion. Soil Water Res 11(2):105–113. https://doi.org/10.17221/233/2015-SWR Jeleńska M, Hasso-Agopsowicz A, Kądziałko-Hofmokl M, Sukhorada A, Bondar K, Matviishina Z (2008) Magnetic iron oxides occurring in chernozem soil from Ukraine and Poland as indicators of pedogenic processes. Stud Geophys Geod 52(2):255–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-008-0017-z Jeleńska M, Górka-Kostrubiec B, Dytłow SK (2018) Magnetic vertical structure of soil as a result of transformation of iron oxides during pedogenesis. The case study of soil profiles from Slovakia and Ukraine. Magnetometry in environmental sciences. Springer, Cham, pp 103–125 Jordanova D, Jordanova N (2019) Diversity and peculiarities of soil formation in eolian landscapes—insights from the mineral magnetic records. Earth Planet Sci Lett 115956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115956 Jordanova N, Petrovský E, Kapicka A, Jordanova D, Petrov P (2017) Application of magnetic methods for assessment of soil restoration in the vicinity of metallurgical copper-processing plant in Bulgaria. Environ Monit Assess 189(4):158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5834-5 Jordanova D, Jordanova N, Barrón V, Petrov P (2018) The signs of past wildfires encoded in the magnetic properties of forest soils. CATENA 171:265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.030 King J, Banerjee SK, Marvin J, Özdemir Ö (1982) A comparison of different magnetic methods for determining the relative grain size of magnetite in natural materials: some results from lake sediments. Earth Planet Sci Lett 59(2):404–419 Kutsenko MV, Timchenko D (2016) Theoretical bases of soil protection against erosion in Ukraine. Kharkiv (in Ukrainian) Lal R (2017) Soil erosion by wind and water: problems and prospects. Soil erosion research methods. Routledge, Milton Park, pp 1–10 Linford N, Linford P, Platzman E (2005) Dating environmental change using magnetic bacteria in archaeological soils from the upper Thames Valley, UK. J Archaeol Sci 32(7):1037–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2005.01.017 Liu L, Zhang K, Fu S, Liu B, Huang M, Zhang Z, Yu Y (2019) Rapid magnetic susceptibility measurement for obtaining superficial soil layer thickness and its erosion monitoring implications. Geoderma 351:163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.05.030 Liu C, Wang W, Deng C (2020) A new weathering indicator from high-temperature magnetic susceptibility measurements in an Argon atmosphere. Geophys J Int 221(3):2010–2025. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa128 Lohmann U, Sausen R, Bengtsson L, Cubasch U, Perlwitz J, Roeckner E (1993) The Köppen climate classification as a diagnostic tool for general circulation models. Climate Res 3:177–193. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr003177 Long X, Ji J, Barrón V, Torrent J (2016) Climatic thresholds for pedogenic iron oxides under aerobic conditions: processes and their significance in paleoclimate reconstruction. Quatern Sci Rev 150:264–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.08.031 Maher BA (1998) Magnetic properties of modern soils and Quaternary loessic paleosols: paleoclimatic implications. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 137:25–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(97)00103-X Maher BA, Alekseev A, Alekseeva T (2003) Magnetic mineralogy of soils across the Russian Steppe: climatic dependence of pedogenic magnetite formation. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 201(3–4):321–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(03)00618-7 Maxbauer DP, Feinberg JM, Fox DL (2016) Magnetic mineral assemblages in soils and paleosols as the basis for paleoprecipitation proxies: a review of magnetic methods and challenges. Earth Sci Rev 155:28–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.01.014 Menshov O, Sukhorada A, Homenko R, Kruglov O (2012) Ultradetailed environmental magnetic investigations in ukraine. in near surface geoscience 2012–18th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers cp-306. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20143416 Menshov O, Kuderavets R, Vyzhva S, Chobotok I, Pastushenko T (2015) Magnetic mapping and soil magnetometry of hydrocarbon prospective areas in western Ukraine. Stud Geophys Geod 59(4):614–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-015-0705-4 Menshov O, Kruglov O, Vyzhva S, Nazarok P, Pereira P, Pastushenko T (2018) Magnetic methods in tracing soil erosion, Kharkov Region, Ukraine. Stud Geophys Geodaet 62(4):681–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-018-0803-1 Menshov O, Spassov S, Camps P, Vyzhva S, Pereira P, Pastushenko T, Demidov V (2020) Soil and dust magnetism in semi-urban area Truskavets, Ukraine. Environ Earth Sci 79:182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-08924-5 Oldfield F (1994) Toward the discrimination of fine grained ferrimagnets by magnetic measurements in lake and near-shore marine sediments. J Geophys Res 99:9045–9050. https://doi.org/10.1029/93JB03137 Panagos P, Borrelli P, Poesen J, Ballabio C, Lugato E, Meusburger K, Alewell C (2015) The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe. Environ Sci Policy 54:438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.012 Petrovský E, Remeš J, Kapička A, Podrázský V, Grison H, Borůvka L (2018) Magnetic mapping of distribution of wood ash used for fertilization of forest soil. Sci Total Environ 626:228–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.095 Quijano L, Gaspar L, Lizaga I, Navas A (2018) Linking soil organic carbon and field measurements of magnetic susceptibility as a proxy of soil quality in arable soils. In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts 20, p 2703 Radaković MG, Gavrilov MB, Hambach U, Schaetzl RJ, Tošić I, Ninkov J, Marković SB (2019) Quantitative relationships between climate and magnetic susceptibility of soils on the Bačka Loess Plateau (Vojvodina, Serbia). Quatern Int 502:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2018.04.040 Szczepaniak-Wnuk I, Górka-Kostrubiec B, Dytłow S, Szwarczewski P, Kwapuliński P, Karasiński J (2020) Assessment of heavy metal pollution in Vistula river (Poland) sediments by using magnetic methods. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:24129–24144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08608-4 Taghdis S, Farpoor MH (2018) Magnetic susceptibility related to soil properties in different land uses of Bardsir region, Kerman Province. J Water Soil 32(1):185–197. https://doi.org/10.22067/JSW.V32I1.69538 Taylor RM, Maher BA, Self PG (1987) Magnetite in soils: I. The synthesis of single-domain and superparamagnetic magnetite. Clay Miner 22:411–422. https://doi.org/10.1180/claymin.1987.022.4.05 Wang L, Liu D, Lü H (2000) Magnetic susceptibility properties of polluted soils. Chin Sci Bull 45(18):1723–1726. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02898995 WRB (2014) World reference base for soil resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Report 106 Yatsuk IP (2017) About the condition of soils of agricultural lands of Ukraine (in Ukrainian) Yue Y, Keli Z, Liang L, Qianhong M, Jianyong L (2019) Estimating long-term erosion and sedimentation rate on farmland using magnetic susceptibility in northeast China. Soil Tillage Res 187:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.11.011