Lake Cheko and the 1908 Tunguska Event

Rendiconti Lincei - Tập 26 - Trang 97-108 - 2015
Luca Gasperini1
1Istituto di Scienze Marine (ISMAR), CNR, Geologia Marina, Bologna, Italy

Tóm tắt

The so-called Tunguska Event (TE), of June 30 1908, is one of those phenomena that have generated a great and durable interest into generations of earth and planetary scientists and a worldwide audience. This is due to several causes, including the remoteness of the site where it occurred and the global scale of its effects. Thousands of kilometers from the epicentre, over Russia and the Northern Europe, the TE was perceived as a series of unusual phenomena, such as seismic and pressure waves and a bright luminescence in the night skies. Only several years later, in 1927, Leonid Kulik reached the explosion site, a remote region of Central Siberia close to the river Podkamennaya Tunguska, which gave later the name to the event. Kulik identified the epicentre of the explosion in a heavily forested area from the radial distribution of flattened trees. He also found many trees that were left standing directly below the explosion, although deprived of their branches and partially burned. Kulik reached the conclusion that he had discovered the remains of a large impact crater hidden by a swamp and a number of secondary bowl-shaped holes of different sizes covered by peat bogs. This pattern could have been caused by an asteroid that fell in a swarm of separate fragments. Other authors questioned this interpretation, suggesting that the observed circular features were not necessarily related to extraterrestrial impacts, but probably to seasonal thawing and freezing of the ground. Two observations favoured this second interpretation: circular features of similar size are common at these latitude; these depressions were found in low-lying areas, but not on the slopes of the hills, or on any of the reliefs occupying a considerable part of the epicentre region. Moreover, all attempts at finding macro-remnants of the cosmic body by digging these circular depressions were unsuccessful; therefore, the hypothesis of an impact with the ground was abandoned. Subsequent expeditions have been devoted mainly to the study of the tree patterns in the devastated taiga and to the search for micro particles of the cosmic body, under the assumption that it exploded in the atmosphere. After more than a century, the TE is far from being completely understood, although it has been the object of several studies. The most probable hypothesis is that it was caused by the impact with the Earth of a cosmic body, a comet or an asteroid, which exploded about 5–10 km above the ground, releasing in the atmosphere 10–15 Mtons of energy. However, fragments of the impacting Tunguska Cosmic Body (TCB) have never been found, and its nature is still a matter of debate. Geophysical and geological data collected from a small lake about 8 km NNW of the inferred TE epicentre suggest that it is probably a crater left by the impact of a large TCB fragment. Evidence supporting this interpretation includes its funnel-like bottom morphology, revealed by high-resolution bathymetry, and the structure and composition of sedimentary deposits below the lake floor, studied through acoustic imagery and direct sampling. Seismic reflection profiles collected from the lake show a density/P-wave velocity anomaly located about 10 m below its bottom, probably the effect of a buried object, which could have created the lake’s depression, or a density anomaly caused by overpressure due to the impact. A magnetic anomaly also marks the presence of such feature. If Lake Cheko, as much evidence seems to suggest, was formed as a consequence of an extraterrestrial impact, it opens the problem of recognizing impact-related features on a composite target such as the Earth surface, very different from the Moon and the other terrestrial planets of the Solar System, where the morphology of “typical” impact features has been mostly studied.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Andreev GA (1990) Was the Tunguska 1908 event caused by an Apollo asteroid? In: Lagerkvist CI, Rickman H, Lindblad BA, Lindgren M (eds) Asteroids, comets, meteors III. Uppsala Astronomical Observatory, Uppsala, p 489 Argollo J, Mourguiart P (2000) Late Quaternary climate history of the Bolivian Altiplano. Quat Int 72:37–51 Artemieva N, Shuvalov V (2007) 3D effects of Tunguska Event on the ground and in the atmosphere. Lunar and planetary science conference XXXVIII, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, Texas Ben-Menahem A (1975) Source parameters of the Siberian explosion of June 30, 1908, from analysis and synthesis of seismic signals at four stations. Phys Earth Planet Inter 11:1–35 Brown PG, Assink JD, Astiz L, Blaauw R, Boslough MB, Borovicˇka J, Brachet N, Brown D, Campbell-Brown M, Ceranna L, Cooke W, de Groot-Hedlin C, Drob DP, Edwards W, Evers LG, Garces M, Gill J, Hedlin M, Kingery A, Laske G, Le Pichon A, Mialle P, Moser DE, Saffer A, Silber E, Smets P, Spalding RE, Spurný P, Tagliaferri E, Uren D, Weryk RJ, Whitaker R, Krzeminski Z (2013) A 500-kiloton airburst over Chelyabinsk and an enhanced hazard from small impactors. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature12741 Brown PG, ReVelle DO, Silber EA, Edwards WN, Arrowsmith S, Jackson LE Jr, Tancredi G, Eaton D (2008) Analysis of a crater-forming meteorite impact in Peru. J Geophys Res 113:E09007. doi:10.1029/2008JE003105 Busch F (1908) Leuchtende Nachtwolken am Nordhorizont. Meteorol Z 25, Juli, 314 Chiba CF, Thomas PJ, Zahnle KJ (1993) The 1908 Tunguska explosion: atmospheric disruption of a stony asteroid. Nature 361:40–44 Collins GS, Artemieva N, Wunnemann K, Bland PA, Reimold WU, Koeberl C (2008) Evidence that Lake Cheko is not an impact crater. Terra Nova. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.2008.00791.x Croft SK, Kieffer SW, Ahrens TJ (1979) Low velocity impact craters in ice and ice-saturated sand with implications for martian crater count ages. J Geophys Res 84:8023–8032 Czudek T, Demek J (1970) Thermokarst in Siberia and its influence on the development of lowland relief. Quat Res 1:103–120 Elbeshausen D, Wünnemann K, Collins GS (2009) Scaling of oblique impacts in frictional targets: implications for crater size and formation mechanisms. Icarus 204:716–731 Farinella P, Foschini L, Froeshle Ch, Gonzi R, Jopek TJ, Longo G, Michel P (2001) Probable asteroidal origin of the Tunguska cosmic body. Astron Astrophys 377:1081–1097 Fast VG, Golenberg NA (1983) Katalog povala lesa, vyzvannogo Tungusskim meteoritom, Catalogue of the tree fall caused by the Tunguska meteorite (in Russian). In: Meteoritnyje i meteornyje issledovanija, Nauka, Novosibirsk, pp 24–74 Fast VG, Barannik AP, Razin SA (1976) O pole napravlenij povala derevjev v rajone padenija Tungusskogo meteorita, On the field of the fallen tree directions in the Tunguska meteorite site (in Russian). In: Voprosy meteoritiki, Izdatelstvo Tomskogo Universiteta, Tomsk, pp 39–52 Florenskij KP (1963) Predvaritelnyje rezultaty Tungusskoj meteoritnoj kompleksnoj ekspeditsii 1961 g., Preliminary results of the 1961 complex Tunguska meteorite expedition (in Russian). Meteoritika 23:3–29 Gasperini L, Stanghellini G (2009) SeisPrho: an interactive computer program for processing and interpretation of high-resolution seismic reflection profiles. Comput Geosci 35:1497–1507 Gasperini L, Alvisi F, Biasini G, Bonatti E, Longo G, Pipan M, Ravaioli M, Serra R (2007) A possible impact crater for the 1908 Tunguska Event. Terra Nova 19:245–251. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.2007.00742.x Gasperini L, Bonatti E, Longo G (2008) Lake Cheko and the Tunguska Event: impact or non-impact? Terra Nova 20:169–172. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.2008.00792.x Gasperini L, Bonatti E, Albertazzi S, Forlani L, Accorsi CA, Longo G, Ravaioli M, Alvisi F, Polonia A, Sacchetti F (2009) Sediments from Lake Cheko (Siberia), a possible impact crater for the 1908 Tunguska Event. Terra Nova 21:489–494. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.2009.00906.x Gasperini L, Cocchi L, Stanghellini C, Stanghellini G, Del Bianco F, Serrazanetti M, Carmisciano C (2012) Magnetic and seismic reflection study of Lake Cheko, a possible impact crater for the 1908 Tunguska event. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 13(Q05008):12. doi:10.1029/2012GC004054 Gasperini L, Stanghellini C, Serra R (2014) The origin of Lake Cheko and the 1908 Tunguska Event recorded by forest trees. Terra Nova 26:440–447. doi:10.1111/ter.12118 Goldine VD (1998) Search for the local centres of the Tunguska explosions. In: Di Martino M, Farinella P, Longo G (eds) Planetary and Space Science, special issue “Tunguska 96”, 46, pp 151–154 Kulik LA (1927) K istorii bolida 30/VI 1908 g, to the history of the 30 June 1908 bolide (in Russian). Doklady AN SSSR, A, 23:393–398 Holsapple KA (1993) The scaling of impact processes in planetary sciences. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 21:333–373 Hou QL, Kolesnikov EM, Xie LW, Kolesnikova NV, Zhou MF, Sun M (2004) Platinum group element abundances in a peat layer associated with the Tunguska event, further evidence for a cosmic origin. Planet Space Sci 52:331–340 Kolesnikov EM, Boettger T, Kolesnikova NV (1999) Finding of probable Tunguska Cosmic Body material: isotopic anomalies of carbon and hydrogen in peat. Planet Space Sci 47:905–916 Kolesnikov EM, Longo G, Boettger T, Kolesnikova NV, Gioacchini P, Forlani L, Giampieri R, Serra R (2003) Isotopic-geochemical study of nitrogen and carbon in peat from the Tunguska Cosmic Body explosion site. Icarus 161:235–243 Koshelev VA (1963) Raboty na ozere Cheko i ih predvaritel’nye rezul’taty, The researches on the lake Cheko and their preliminary results (in Russian). In: Problema Tungusskogo meteorita, Izdatelstvo Tomskogo Universiteta, Tomsk, pp 168–170 Krinov EL (1949) Tungusskiy Meteorit, The Tunguska meteorite (in Russian). Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moscow-Leningrad, p 196 Kulik LA (1940) Meteoritnaja ekspeditsija na Podkamennuju Tungusku v 1939 g., The 1939 meteorite expedition to the Podkamennaya Tunguska (in Russian). Doklady Akad Nauk SSSR 28 7:597–601 Longo G, Serra R, Cecchini S, Galli M (1994) Search for microremnants of the Tunguska cosmic body. Planet Space Sci 42:163–177 Longo G, Di Martino M, Andreev G, Anfinogenov J, Budaeva L, Kovrigin E (2005) A new unified catalogue and a new map of the 1908 tree fall in the site of the Tunguska Cosmic Body explosion. Asteroid-comet hazard-2005. Institute of Applied Astronomy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, pp 222–225 Melosh HJ (1988) Impact cratering a geologic process. Oxford Monogr Geol Geophys 11:245 Sapronov NL (1986) Drevnye vulkanicheskie struktury na yuge tungusskoj sineklizy, Ancient volcanic structures on the south of the Tunguska synclinal (in Russian). Nauka, Novosibirsk Sekanina Z (1998) Evidence for asteroidal origin of the Tunguska object. Planet Space Sci 46:191–204 Serra R, Cecchini S, Galli M, Longo G (1994) Experimental hints on the fragmentation of the Tunguska cosmic body. Planet Space Sci 42:777–783 Shoemaker EM (1962) Interpretation of lunar craters. In: Kopal Z (ed) Physics and astronomy of the moon. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 283–359 Suslov IM (1927) Krozysku bolshogo meteorita 1908 g. Mirovedenie 14:13–18 Tancredi et al (2009) A meteorite crater on earth formed on September 15, 2007: the Carancas hypervelocity impact. Meteorit Planet Sci 44:1967–1984 Vasilyev NV, Zhuravlev VK, Zhuravleva RK, Kovalevskij AF, Plekhanov GF (1965) Nochnye svetyashiesya oblaka i opticheskie anomalii, svyazannye s padeniem Tungusskogo meteorita, The noctilucent clouds and the optical anomalies connected to the Tunguska meteorite fall (in Russian). Nauka, Moscow, p 112 Voznesenskij AV (1925) Padenie meteorita 30 iyunia 1908 g. v verhovyah reki Hatangi. Mirovedenie 14:25–38 Wessel P, Smith WHF (1991) Free software helps map and display data. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 72:445–446 Zotkin IT (1961) Ob anomal’nyh optichekih yavleniah v atmosfere svyazannyh s padeniem tungusskogo meteorita, On the atmospheric anomalous optical phenomena connected to the Tunguska meteorite fall (in Russian). Meteoritika 20:40–53