Labour characteristics of women achieving successful vaginal birth after caesarean section in three European countries
Tài liệu tham khảo
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 2014, Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 210, 179, 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026
Annessi, 2016, A modified prediction model for VBAC, in a European population, J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med., 29, 435, 10.3109/14767058.2014.1002767
Betran, 2016, WHO statement on caesarean section rates, BJOG, 123, 667, 10.1111/1471-0528.13526
Birara, 2013, Factors associated with success of vaginal birth after one caesarean section (VBAC) at three teaching hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a case control study, BMC Preg. Childbirth, 13, 31, 10.1186/1471-2393-13-31
Clarke, 2015, Trials, 16, 542, 10.1186/s13063-015-1061-y
Clarke, M., Devane, D., Gross, M.M., Morano, S., Lundgren, I., Sinclair, M., Putman, K., Beech, B., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K., Nieuwenhuijze, M., Wiseman, H., Smith, V., Daly, D., Savage, G., Newell, J., Simpkin, A., Grylka-Baeschlin, S., Healy, P., Nicoletti, J., Lalor, J., Carroll, M., van Limbeek, E., Nilsson, C., Stockdale, J., Fobelets, M. and Begley, C. submitted. OptiBIRTH: a Cluster Randomised Trial of a Complex Intervention to Increase Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section (ISRCTN10612254), submitted to BMC Preg. Childbirth.
DGGG, 2012. Tocolytics to prevent preterm birth, AWMF guideline Nr. 015/025. https://www.dggg.de/fileadmin/documents/leitlinien/archiviert/federfuehrend/015036_Anwendung_von_CTG_waehrend_Schwangerschaft_und_Geburt/015036_2012.pdf
DGGG, 2010. Procedure with premature rupture of the membranes, AWMF guideline Nr. 015/029. https://www.dggg.de/fileadmin/documents/leitlinien/archiviert/federfuehrend/015029_Empfehlungen_zum_Vorgehen_beim_vorzeitigen_Blasensprung/015029_2010.pdf
Euro-Peristat, 2018. European Perinatal Health Report, Core indicators of the health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2015. http://www.europeristat.com/images/EPHR2015_Euro-Peristat.pdf
Fagerberg, 2013, Indications for first caesarean and delivery mode in subsequent trial of labour, Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol., 27, 72, 10.1111/ppe.12024
Grobman, 2007, Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, Obstet. Gynecol., 109, 806, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000259312.36053.02
Gross, 2001
Gross, 2015, Interinstitutional variations in mode of birth after a previous caesarean section: a cross-sectional study in six German hospitals, J. Perinat. Med., 43, 177, 10.1515/jpm-2014-0108
Grylka-Baeschlin, 2016, Labour duration and timing of interventions in women planning vaginal birth after caesarean section, Midwifery, 34, 221, 10.1016/j.midw.2015.11.004
Grylka-Baeschlin, 2014, Cultural differences in postnatal quality of life among German-speaking women - a prospective survey in two countries, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 14, 12, 10.1186/1471-2393-14-277
Hanley, 2016, Diagnosing onset of labor: a systematic review of definitions in the research literature, BMC Preg. Childbirth, 16, 71, 10.1186/s12884-016-0857-4
Hildingsson, 2015, How long is a normal labor? Contemporary patterns of labor and birth in a low-risk sample of 1,612 women from four Nordic countries, Birth, 42, 346, 10.1111/birt.12191
Hosmer, 2000
Knight, 2014, Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success, BJOG, 121, 183, 10.1111/1471-0528.12508
Landon, 2016, What we have learned about trial of labor after cesarean delivery from the MFMU cesarean registry, Semin. Perinatol., 40, 281, 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.03.003
Landon, 2005, The MFMU cesarean registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 193, 1016, 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.066
Lawrence, A., Lewis, L., Hofmeyr, G.J., Styles, C., 2013. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003934. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003934.pub4
Macfarlane, 2016, Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study, BJOG, 123, 559, 10.1111/1471-0528.13284
Macones, 2001, Predicting outcomes of trials of labor in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a comparison of multivariate methods with neural networks, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 184, 409, 10.1067/mob.2001.109386
Metz, 2013, Simple, validated vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model for use at the time of admission, Obstet. Gynecol., 122, 571, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829f8ced
Mikolajczyk, 2013, Regional variation in caesarean deliveries in Germany and its causes, BMC Preg. Childbirth, 13, 99, 10.1186/1471-2393-13-99
Ministry of Health Italy, 2016. Caesarean section, an appropriate and conscious choice, second part, Guideline 22. http://percorsonascita.ats-bg.it/documenti_istituzionali/LG_Cesareo_finaleL.pdf
Perez, 2019, 810: can we improve our ability to predict VBAC success in the contemporary labor management era, Am. J. Obs. Gyn., 220, S531, 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.833
Petersen, 2011, The timing of interventions during labour: descriptive results of a longitudinal study, Midwifery, 27, e267
Petersen, 2013, The sequence of intrapartum interventions: a descriptive approach to the cascade of interventions, Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 288, 245, 10.1007/s00404-013-2737-8
Prinja, 2010, Censoring in clinical trials: review of survival analysis techniques, Indian J Community Med, 35, 217, 10.4103/0970-0218.66859
RCOG, 2015. Birth after previous caesarean birth, Green-top Guideline No. 45.
Sabol, 2015, Vaginal birth after cesarean: an effective method to reduce cesarean, Clin. Obstet. Gynecol., 58, 309, 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000101
Scott, 2014, Intrapartum management of trial of labour after caesarean delivery: evidence and experience, BJOG, 121, 157, 10.1111/1471-0528.12449
Sedgwick, 2014, How to read a Kaplan-Meier survival plot, BMJ, 349, g5608, 10.1136/bmj.g5608
West, H.M., Jozwiak, M., Dodd, J.M., 2017. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6, CD009792. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009792.pub3
WHO, 2015. WHO | WHO statement on caesarean section rates [WWW Document]. URL http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/cs-statement/en/ (accessed 6.6.17).
Ye, 2016, Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data, BJOG, 123, 745, 10.1111/1471-0528.13592