Laboratory demonstration of the impact of weak interfaces and layered rock properties on hydraulic fracture containment and height growth
Tóm tắt
Hydraulic fracturing and waterflooding are both widely applied methods for improving the recovery of oil and gas resources. These methods have increasing commonality because many waterfloods are being carried out at high enough pressure to generate hydraulic fractures. Even so, it is challenging for engineers to make an optimal wellbore pressure design for layered and otherwise complex underground formations. An overly aggressive injection pressure may lead to uncontrollable fracture height growth into non-producing layers adjacent to the reservoir. In contrast, when using classical but highly simplified height growth models, the pressure limits can be far too conservative which may lead to lower recovery rates and inefficient use of resources invested in developing producing reservoirs. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the mechanism of fracture height growth while considering the coupling effect from multiple dominated factors. This research contributes an experimental approach to evaluating the role of stresses, weak interfaces, and mechanical properties of a three-layer system in promoting or containing hydraulic fracture height growth from a central reservoir into neighboring barrier layers. In all cases, the experiments agree that the pressure required to induce substantial height growth exceeds the stress applied to the barrier layers and is far above classical predictions. Additionally, when the reservoir layer is softer than the barriers, the containment is sustained to even higher pressures than for layers with similar material properties. Finally, the experiments show that permeability of the barrier layer can induce a more sudden transition to uncontrolled height growth when fracture reaches the bedding interfaces. Hydraulic fracture height growth is mitigated by weak interfaces between layers. Unstable height growth typically requires fluid pressure to exceed the in-situ stress in the bounding layer(s). Contrasting layer stiffness and permeability often leads to further mitigation of height growth.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bunger AP, Detournay E (2008) Experimental validation of the tip asymptotics for a fluid-driven crack. J Mech Phys Solids 56(11):3101–3115
Bunger AP, Menand T, Cruden A, Zhang X, Halls H (2013) Analytical predictions for a natural spacing within dyke swarms. Earth Planet Sci Lett 375:270–279
Daneshy AA (1978) Hydraulic fracture propagation in layered formations. Soc Pet Eng J 18(01):33–41
Daneshy AA (2009) Factors controlling the vertical growth of hydraulic fractures. In: Paper presented at the SPE hydraulic fracturing technology conference, January 19–21, 2009, The Woodlands, Texas. SPE-118789-MS
de Pater CJ, Dong Y (2009) Fracture containment in soft sands by permeability or strength contrasts. In: Paper presented at the SPE hydraulic fracturing technology conference, January 19–21, 2009, The Woodlands, Texas. SPE-119634
de Pater CJ, Cleary MP, Quinn TS, Barr DT, Johnson DE, Weijers L (1994) Experimental verification of dimensional analysis for hydraulic fracturing. SPE Prod Facil 9(04):230–238
Economides MJ, Nolte KG (2000) Reservoir stimulation. Wiley, Hoboken
El Rabaa W (1987) Hydraulic fracture propagation in the presence of stress variation. In: Paper presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, September 27–30, 1987, Dallas, Texas. SPE-16898-MS
Holder J, Olson JE, Philip Z (2001) Experimental determination of subcritical crack growth parameters in sedimentary rock. Geophys Res Lett 28(4):599–602
Jeffrey RG, Bunger A (2009) A detailed comparison of experimental and numerical data on hydraulic fracture height growth through stress contrasts. SPE J 14(03):413–422
Montgomery CT, Smith MB (2010) Hydraulic fracturing: history of an enduring technology. J Pet Technol 62(12):26–40
Nolte KG, Smith MB (1981) Interpretation of fracturing pressures. J Pet Technol 33(09):1767–1775
Pagoulatos A (2004) Evaluation of multistage triaxial testing on Berea sandstone. M.S., University of Oklahoma
Quinn TS (1994) Experimental analysis of permeability barriers to hydraulic fracture propagation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
Renshaw C, Pollard D (1995) An experimentally verified criterion for propagation across unbounded frictional interfaces in brittle, linear elastic materials. In: Paper presented at the international journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences and geomechanics abstracts
Simonson ER, Abou-Sayed AS, Clifton RJ (1978) Containment of massive hydraulic fractures. Soc Pet Eng J 18(01):27–32
Tada H, Paris PC, Irwin GR (2000) The stress analysis of cracks handbook, 3rd edn. ASME Press, New York
Teufel LW, Clark JA (1984) Hydraulic fracture propagation in layered rock: experimental studies of fracture containment. Soc Pet Eng J 24(01):19–32
Thiercelin M, Roegiers J, Boone T, Ingraffea A (1987) An investigation of the material parameters that govern the behavior of fractures approaching rock interfaces. In: Paper presented at the 6th ISRM congress, August 30-September 3, 1987, Montreal, Canada. ISRM-6CONGRESS-1987-049
Warpinski NR, Teufel LW (1987) Influence of geologic discontinuities on hydraulic fracture propagation. J Pet Technol 39(02):209–220
Wu R, Bunger A, Jeffrey R, Siebrits E (2008) A comparison of numerical and experimental results of hydraulic fracture growth into a zone of lower confining stress. In: Paper presented at the The 42nd US rock mechanics symposium (USRMS), June 29–July 2, 2008, San Francisco, California. ARMA-08-267
Xing P, Yoshioka K, Adachi J, El-Fayoumi A, Bunger AP (2017) Laboratory measurement of tip and global behavior for zero-toughness hydraulic fractures with circular and blade-shaped (PKN) geometry. J Mech Phys Solids 104:172–186
Xing P, Yoshioka K, Adachi J, El-Fayoumi A, Bunger AP (2018a) Laboratory demonstration of hydraulic fracture height growth across weak discontinuities. Geophysics 83(2):MR93–MR105
Xing P, Yoshioka K, Adachi J, El-Fayoumi A, Damjanac B, Bunger AP (2018b) Lattice simulation of laboratory hydraulic fracture containment in layered reservoirs. Comput Geotech 100:62–75