Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Gán nhãn cho các hành vi bạo lực tình dục: Các đặc điểm của vụ tấn công, thái độ và kinh nghiệm sống đóng vai trò gì?
Behavior and Social Issues - 2014
Tóm tắt
Nhãn được gán cho một hành vi bạo lực tình dục nhất định (ví dụ: hiếp dâm, tấn công tình dục) có thể có ảnh hưởng đáng kể đến nhận thức về sự cố và vai trò của các cá nhân liên quan. Nghiên cứu đã chỉ ra rằng các kịch bản hiếp dâm cá nhân và các đặc điểm tấn công là những yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến việc gán nhãn bạo lực tình dục. Nghiên cứu này thúc đẩy lĩnh vực này bằng cách cung cấp thông tin về ảnh hưởng của các biến liên quan đến người tham gia (ví dụ: kinh nghiệm sống, thái độ cá nhân) đối với việc gán nhãn một ví dụ về bạo lực tình dục. Kết quả từ nghiên cứu trực tuyến với 379 người tham gia cho thấy rằng đồng cảm với nạn nhân, đồng cảm với thủ phạm, chấp nhận những huyền thoại về hiếp dâm (RMA) và việc nhận được thông báo về hiếp dâm có liên quan đến việc gán nhãn đúng cách một ví dụ bạo lực tình dục là hiếp dâm; RMA vẫn là một yếu tố tiên đoán quan trọng trong việc gán nhãn sau khi tất cả các biến được đưa vào hồi quy đồng thời. Các đặc điểm của vụ tấn công, lịch sử bị tấn công, công nhận việc bị tấn công và giới tính không có liên quan đến nhãn gán cho ví dụ trong hồi quy, mặc dù việc xem xét lý do định tính được đưa ra để gán nhãn ví dụ cho thấy rằng một số yếu tố này có thể ảnh hưởng đến sự lựa chọn nhãn. Quan trọng là, những người tham gia đã gán nhãn sự kiện là hiếp dâm ít có khả năng đổ lỗi cho nạn nhân về vụ tấn công. Các ý nghĩa của việc xác định và gán nhãn đúng các trải nghiệm bạo lực tình dục, cả cho nạn nhân và cho nhà cung cấp hỗ trợ, được thảo luận.
Từ khóa
#bạo lực tình dục #hiếp dâm #gán nhãn #thái độ #kinh nghiệm sốngTài liệu tham khảo
Adams-Curtis, L. E., & Forbes, G. B. (2004). College women’s experiences of sexual coercion: A review of cultural, perpetrator, victim, and situational variables. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5, 91–122. doi: 10.1177/1524838003262331
Ahrens, C. E. (2006). Being silenced: The impact of negative social reactions on the disclosure of rape. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 263–274. doi: 10.1007/s10464-006-9069-9
Ahrens, C. E., Campbell, R., Ternier-Thames, N. K., Wasco, S. M., & Sefl, T. (2007). Deciding whom to tell: Expectations and outcomes of rape survivors’ first disclosures. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 38–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00329.x
Ahrens, C. E., Stansell, J., & Jennings, A. (2010). To tell or not to tell: The impact of disclosure on sexual assault survivors’ recovery. Violence and Victims, 25, 631–648. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.25.5.631
Alderden, M. A., & Ullman, S. E. (2012). Gender difference or indifference? Detective decision making in sexual assault cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 3–22. doi: 10.1177/0886260511416465
Allen, W. D. (2007). The reporting and underreporting of rape. Southern Economic Journal, 73(3), 623–641.
Banyard, V. L., Moynihan, M. M., Walsh, W. A., Cohn, E. S., & Ward, S. (2010). Friends of survivors: The community impact of unwanted sexual experiences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 242–256. doi: 10.1177/0886260509334407
Bell, K. M., & Naugle, A. E. (2007). Effects of social desirability on students’ self-reporting of partner abuse perpetration and victimization. Violence and Victims, 22, 243–256. doi: 10.1891/088667007780477348
Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., …Stevens, M. R. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Bogart, L. M., Cecil, H., Wagstaff, D. A., Pinkerton, S. D., & Abramson, P. R. (2000). Is it “sex”? College students’ interpretations of sexual behavior terminology. The Journal of Sex Research, 37, 108–116. doi: 10.1080/00224490009552027
Bondurant, B. (2001). University women’s acknowledgement of rape: Individual, situational, and social factors. Violence Against Women, 7, 294–314. doi: 10.1177/1077801201007003004
Clay-Warner, J., & McMahon-Howard, J. (2009). Rape reporting: “Classic rape” and the behavior of the law. Violence and Victims, 24, 723–743. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.24.6.723
Crome, S. A., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Adult rape scripting within a victimological perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 395–413. doi: 10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00013-6
Davis, R. C., Brickman, E., & Baker, T. (1991). Supportive and unsupportive responses of others to rape victims: Effects on concurrent victim adjustment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 443–451. doi: 10.1007/BF00938035
DuMont, J., & Parnis, D. (2006). The uses and impacts of medico-legal evidence in sexual assault cases: A global review. Unpublished document prepared for the Gender Health Unit, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Edwards, K. M., Turchik, J. A., Dardis, C. M., Reynolds, N., & Gidycz, C. A. (2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, 65, 761–773. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-9943-2
Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ferro, C., Cermele, J., & Saltzman, A. (2008). Current perceptions of marital rape: Some good and not-so-good news. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 764–779. doi: 10.1177/0886260507313947
Foubert, J. D. (2000). The longitudinal effects of a rape-prevention program on fraternity men’s attitudes, behavioral intent, and behavior. Journal of American College Health, 48, 158–163. doi: 10.1080/07448480009595691
Gerger, H., Kley, H., Bohner, G., & Siebler, F. (2007). The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 422–440. doi: 10.1002/ab.20195
Gidycz, C. A., Layman, M. J., Rich, C. L., Crothers, M., Matorin, A., & Jacobs, C. D. (2001). An evaluation of an acquaintance rape prevention program: Impact on attitudes, sexual aggression, and sexual victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1120–1138. doi: 10.1177/088626001016011002
Grubb, A., & Harrower, J. (2008). Attribution of blame in cases of rape: An analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 396–405. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2008.06.006
Grubb, A., & Turner, E. (2012). Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 443–452. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002
Hamby, S. L., & Koss, M. P. (2003). Shades of gray: A qualitative study of terms used in the measurement of sexual victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 243–255. doi: 10.1111/1471-6402.00104
Hammond, C. B., & Calhoun, K. S. (2007). Labeling of abuse experiences and rates of victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 371–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00386.x
Hannon, R., Kuntz, T., Van Laar, S., Williams, J., & Hall, D. S. (1996). College students’ judgments regarding sexual aggression during a date. Sex Roles, 35, 765–780.
doi: 10.1007/BF01544091
Kahn, A. S., Jackson, J., Kully, C., Badger, K., & Halvorsen, J. (2003). Calling it rape: Differences in experiences of women who do or do not label their sexual assault as rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 233–242. doi: 10.1111/1471-6402.00103
Kahn, A. S., Mathie, V. A., & Torgler, C. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgement. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 53–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00296.x
Kilpatrick, D. G., Resnick, H. S., Ruggiero, K. J., Conoscenti, L. M., & McCauley, J. (2007). Drug-facilitated, incapacitated, and forcible rape: A national study. (National Institute of Justice Publication No. NCJ 219181). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Kittur, A., Chi, E., & Suh, B. (2008). Crowdsourcing for usability: Using micro-task markets for rapid, remote and low-cost user measurements. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 2008), 453–456.
Kolivas, E. D., & Gross, A. M. (2007). Assessing sexual aggression: Addressing the gap between rape victimization and perpetration prevalence rates. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 315–328. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2006.10.002
Koss, M. P. (1993). Detecting the scope of rape: A review of prevalence research methods. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 198–222. doi: 10.1177/088626093008002004
Koss, M. P., Abbey, A., Campbell, R., Cook, S; Norris, J., Testa, C., Ullman, S., West, C., & White, J. (2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 357–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x
Koss, M. P., Abbey, A., Campbell, R., Cook, S; Norris, J., Testa, C., Ullman, S., West, C., & White, J. (2008). Erratum. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 493–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00468.x
Koss, M. P., Dinero, T. E., Seibel, C. A., & Cox, S. L. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victim’s experience? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00924.x
Koss, M. P., Heise, L., & Russo, N. F. (1994). The global health burden of rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 509–537. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01046.x
Krulewitz, J. E., & Payne, E. J. (1978). Attributions about rape: Effects of rapist force, observer sex and sex role attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 291–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1978.tb00784.x
Layman, M. J., Gidycz, C. A., & Lynn, S. J. (1996). Unacknowledged versus acknowledged rape victims: Situational factors and posttraumatic stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 124–131. doi: 10.1037//0021-843X.105.1.124
Lisak, D., & Miller, P. M. (2002). Repeat rape and multiple offending among undetected rapists. Violence and Victims, 17, 73–84. doi: 10.1891/vivi.17.1.73.33638
Littleton, H. L., Axsom, D., & Grills-Taquechel, A. (2009). Sexual assault victims’ acknowledgement status and revictimization risk. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 34–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01472.x
Littleton, H. L., Axsom, D., Radecki Breitkopf, C., & Berenson, A. (2006). Rape acknowledgement and postassault experiences: How acknowledgement status relates to disclosure, coping, worldview, and reactions received from others. Violence and Victims, 21, 761–778. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.21.6.761
Littleton, H. L., Rhatigan, D. L., & Axsom, D. (2007). Unacknowledged rape: How much do we know about the hidden rape victim? Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 14, 57–74. doi: 10.1300/J146v14n04_04
Littleton, H., Tabernik, H., Canales, E. J., & Backstrom, T. (2009). Risky situation or harmless fun? A qualitative examination of college women’s bad hook-up and rape scripts. Sex Roles, 60, 793–804. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9586-8
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1–23. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
McMahon, S. (2011, October). Changing Perceptions of Sexual Violence Over Time. Harrisburg, PA: VAWnet, a project of the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/www.vawnet.org.
McMullin, D., & White, J. W. (2006). Long-term effects of labeling a rape experience. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 96–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00266.x
Muehlenhard, C. L., Powch, I. G., Phelps, J. L., & Giusti, L. M. (1992). Definitions of rape: Scientific and political implications. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 23–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01155.x
QSR International. (2012). NVivo 10 [Computer software]. Available from https://doi.org/www.qsrinternational.com
O’Neil, M., & Morgan, P. (2010). American perceptions of sexual violence: A FrameWorks research report. Washington, D.C.: FrameWorks Institute.
Orchowski, L. M., Untied, A. S., & Gidycz, C. A. (2013). Factors associated with college women’s labeling of sexual victimization. Violence and Victims, 28, 940–958. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-12-00049
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 411–419.
Patterson, D. (2011). The linkage between secondary victimization by law enforcement and rape case outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 328–347. doi: 10.1177/0886260510362889
Patterson, D., Greeson, M., & Campbell, R. (2009). Understanding rape survivors’ decisions not to seek help from formal social systems. Health & Social Work, 34, 127–136. doi: 10.1093/hsw/34.2.127
Paul, L. A., & Sasson, S. (2013). Post-assault social support: The role of others in helping victims recover. In K. Bletzer (Ed.), Assaults: Interventions, preventive strategies and societal implications (pp. 51–82). Nova Publishers: New York.
Paul, L. A., Walsh, K., McCauley, J. L., Ruggiero, K. J., Resnick, H. S., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (2013). College women’s experiences with rape disclosure: A national study. Violence Against Women, 19, 486–502. doi: 10.1177/1077801213487746
Paul, L. A., Walsh, K., McCauley, J. L., Ruggiero, K. J., Resnick, H. S., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (2014). Characteristics and life experiences associated with receiving a rape disclosure within a national telephone household probability sample of women. Journal of Community Psychology, 42, 583–592. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21639
Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex in labeling their own experiences. Sex Roles, 51, 129–144. doi: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000037758.95376.00
Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2011). A match-and-motivation model of how women label their nonconsensual sexual experiences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 558–570. doi: 10.1177/0361684311410210
Ryan, K. M. (1988). Rape and seduction scripts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 237–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00939.x
Ryan, K. M. (2011). The relationship between rape myths and sexual scripts: The social construction of rape. Sex Roles, 65, 774–782. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0033-2
Sarmiento, I. (2011). Rape stereotypes and labeling: Awareness of victimization and trauma. Psychological Reports, 108, 141–148. doi: 10.2466/07.13.16.PR0.108.1.141-148
Shotland, R. L., & Goodstein, L. (1983). Just because she doesn’t want to doesn’t mean it’s rape: An experimentally based causal model of the perception of rape in a dating situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 220–232. doi: 10.2307/3033793
Smith, C. A., & Frieze, I. H. (2003). Examining rape empathy from the perspective of the victim and the assailant. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 476–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01907.x
Sugarman, D. B., & Hotaling, G. T. (1997). Intimate violence and social desirability: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 275–290. doi: 10.1177/088626097012002008
Tetreault, P. A., & Barnett, M. A. (1987). Reactions to stranger and acquaintance rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 353–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00909.x
Ullman, S. E. (1996). Social reactions, coping strategies, and self-blame attributions in adjustment to sexual assault. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 505–526. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00319.x
Ullman, S. E. (2010). Talking about sexual assault: Society’s response to survivors. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Ullman, S. E., & Filipas, H. H. (2001). Predictors of PTSD symptoms severity and social reactions in sexual assault victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 14, 369–389. doi: 10.1023/A:1011125220522
Wilkinson, C. (2008). Unwanted sex versus rape: How the language used to describe sexual assault impacts perceptions of perpetrator guilt, victim blame and reporting. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3315391)