Lab-like findings from online experiments

Amir, O., Rand, D., & Kobi, Y. (2012). Economic games on the internet: The effect of \$1 stakes. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031461.

Arechar, A., Gätcher, S., & Molleman, L. (2018). Conducting interactive experiments online. Experimental Economics, 21(1), 99–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-017-9527-2.

Buso, I. M., De Caprariis, S., Di Cagno, D., Ferrari, L., Larocca, V., Marazzi, F., Panaccione, L., & Spadoni, L. (2020). The effects of covid-19 lockdown on fairness and cooperation: Evidence from a lablike experiment. Economics Letters, 196(C), S0165176520303487. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:196:y:2020:i:c:s0165176520303487

Chandler, J., Mueller, P., & Paolacci, G. (2014). Nonnaiveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 112–130. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7.

Chen, D., Schonger, M., & Wickens, C. (2016). oTree-an open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9(C), 8–97. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:9:y:2016:i:c:p:88-97

Crump, M., McDonnell, J., & Gureckis, T. (2013). Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS One, 8(3), e57410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057410.

Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x.

Duch, M. L., Grossmann, M. R. P., & Lauer, T. (2020). z-Tree unleashed: A novel client-integrating architecture for conducting z-Tree experiments over the internet. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 28(3), 100400.

Giamattei, M., Yahosseini, K. S., Gächter, S., & Molleman, L. (2020). LIONESS Lab: A free web-based platform for conducting interactive experiments online. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 6(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-020-00087-. https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jesaex/v6y2020i1d10.1007_s40881-020-00087-0.html

Greiner, B. (2015). Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1(1), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-015-0004-4.

Gupta, N., Rigotti, L., & Wilson, A. (2021). The experimenters’ dilemma: Inferential preferences over populations. arXiv:2107.05064

Horton, J., Rand, D., & Zeckhauser, R. (2013). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14, 399–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9273-9.

Litman, L., Moss, A., Rosenzweig, C., & Robinson, J. (2021). Reply to MTurk, Prolific or panels? Choosing the right audience for online research. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3775075 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3775075

Peer, E., Rothschild, D., Gordon, A., Evernden, Z., & Damer, E. (2021). Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01694-3.

Weimann, J., & Brosig-Koch, J. (2019). Methods in Experimental Economics. Springer.