La télécardiologie en France, état des lieux en 2012 et perspectives de développement

P. Mabo1, L. Guédon-Moreau2, J. Clémenty3, S. Kacet4
1Centre cardio-pneumologique, CHU de Rennes, rue Henri-Le-Guilloux, 35033 Rennes cedex, France
2Unité de soins palliatifs, hôpital cardiologique, CHRU de Lille, 59037 Lille cedex, France
3Service de cardiologie, hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, avenue de Magellan, 33604 Pessac, France
4Unité de soins palliatifs, service de cardiologie, hôpital cardiologique, CHRU de Lille, 59037 Lille cedex, France

Tài liệu tham khảo

Brugada, 2006, What evidence do we have to replace in-hospital implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up?, Clin Res Cardiol, 95, 113 Lazarus, 2007, Remote, wireless, ambulatory monitoring of implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy systems: analysis of a worldwide database, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 30, 52 Crossley, 2009, Clinical benefits of remote versus transtelephonic monitoring of implanted pacemaker, J Am Coll Cardiol, 54, 2012, 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.001 Crossley, 2011, The CONNECT (clinical evaluation of remote notification to reduce time to clinical decision) trial: the value of wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts, J Am Coll Cardiol, 57, 1181, 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.012 Guedon-Moreau, 2010, Contributions of remote monitoring to the follow-up of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads under advisory, Eur Heat J, 31, 2246, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq203 Varma, 2010, Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T safety reduces routine office device follow-up (TRUST) trial, Circulation, 122, 325, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.937409 Mabo P, Victor F, Bazin P, et al. A randomized trial of long term remote monitoring of pacemaker recipients (The COMPAS trial). Eur Heart J 2011. [Epub ahead of print]. Kacet S. ECOST: safety of implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up using remote monitoring: a randomized controlled trial. ESC Congress 2011. Hot Line II. Mabo P. Remote follow-up of patients implanted with an ICD. The prospective randomized EVATEL study. ESC Congress 2011. Hot Line II. Marzegalli, 2008, Remote monitoring of CRT-ICD: the multicenter Italian CareLink evaluation – ease of use, acceptance, and organizational implications, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 31, 1259, 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01175.x Articles R6316-1. Code de la santé publique; 2010. Wilkoff, 2008, HRS/EHRA espert consensus on the monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations, Heart Rhythm, 5, 907, 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.04.013