La différence minimale cliniquement importante (DMCI) peut-elle être identifiée sur un échantillon français d’arthroplasties totales de la hanche ? Méthode de mesure de la DMCI utilisant comme ancre un item du questionnaire

Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique - Tập 107 - Trang 285-293 - 2021
Sophie Putman1,2,3,4, Julien Dartus1,2, Henri Migaud1,2, Gilles Pasquier1,2, Julien Girard1,2, Cristian Preda2,5,6, Alain Duhamel2,3,4
1CHU Lille, Service d’Orthopédie, Hôpital Salengro, Place de Verdun, 59000 Lille, France
2Université Lille, 59000 Lille, France
3University Lille, CHU Lille, ULR2694–METRICS: évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, 59000 Lille, France
4CHU Lille, Department of Biostatistics, 59000 Lille, France
5Laboratory of Mathematics Paul Painlevé, UMR CNRS 8524, University of Lille, Lille, France
6Lille CatholicHhospitals, Biostatistics Department, Delegation for Clinical Research and Innovation, Lille Catholic University, Lille, France

Tài liệu tham khảo

Jaeschke, 1989, Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference, Control ClinTrials, 10, 407 Singh, 2016, Clinically important improvement thresholds for Harris Hip Score and its ability to predict revision risk after primary total hip arthroplasty, BMC MusculoskeletDisord, 17, 256, 10.1186/s12891-016-1106-8 Lyman, 2018, What are the minimal and substantial improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR versions after total joint replacement ?, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 476, 2432, 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000456 Revicki, 2008, Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes, J Clin Epidemiol, 61, 102, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012 Copay, 2018, Minimum clinically important difference: current trends in the orthopaedic literature. Part II: lower extremity: a systematic review, JBJS Rev, 6, e2, 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00160 Celik, 2019, Minimal clinically important difference ofcommonly used hip-, knee-, foot-, and ankle-specific questionnaires: a systematicreview, J Clin Epidemiol, 113, 44, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017 Nilsdotter, 2003, Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement, BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 4, 10, 10.1186/1471-2474-4-10 Ornetti, 2010, Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) in hip osteoarthritis patients, Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 18, 522, 10.1016/j.joca.2009.12.007 Terwee, 2010, Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods, J Clin Epidemiol, 63, 524, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.010 Dawson, 1996, Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 78, 185, 10.1302/0301-620X.78B2.0780185 Delaunay, 2009, Cross-cultural adaptations of the Oxford-12 Hip score to the French speaking population Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 95, 89 Klouche, 2018, Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the French version of the Forgotten Joint Score in total hip arthroplasty, Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 104, 657, 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.010 Copay, 2007, Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods, Spine J, 7, 541, 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008 Norman, 2003, Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation, Med Care, 41, 582, 10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C Wyrwich, 2004, Minimal important difference thresholds and the standard error of measurement: is there a connection?, J Biopharm Stat, 14, 97, 10.1081/BIP-120028508 Hosmer, 2000, Chapter 5, 160 Youden, 1950, Index for rating diagnostic test, Cancer, 3, 32, 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3 Cohen, 1988 Beard, 2015, Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery, J Clin Epidemiol, 68, 73, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009 Martín-Fernández, 2017, Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Oxford Hip Score in patients with hip osteoarthritis, BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 18, 205, 10.1186/s12891-017-1568-3 Impellizzeri, 2012, The early outcome of surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: success depends on how you measure it, Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 20, 638, 10.1016/j.joca.2012.03.019 Nwachukwu, 2018, Minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after revision hip arthroscopy, Arthroscopy, 34, 1862, 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.050 Paulsen, 2014, Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients 1 year postoperatively, Acta Orthop, 85, 39, 10.3109/17453674.2013.867782 Goodman, 2019, Validation of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score pain and function subscales for use in total hip replacement and total knee replacement clinical trials, J Arthroplasty, 35 Kuo, 2020, Comparing methods to determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for veterans undergoing elective total hip or knee arthroplasty in veterans health administration hospitals, JAMA Surg, 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0024 Giesinger, 2019, Normative values for the Forgotten Joint Score-12 for the US general population, J Arthroplasty, 34, 650, 10.1016/j.arth.2018.12.011 Perkins, 2006, The inconsistency of “optimal” cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, Am J Epidemiol, 163, 670, 10.1093/aje/kwj063 Aletaha, 2009, Perception of improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis varies with disease activity levels at baseline, Arthritis Rheum, 61, 313, 10.1002/art.24282 Danoff, 2018, How much pain is significant? Defining the minimal clinically important difference for the Visual Analog Scale for pain after total joint arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 33, S71, 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.029 Lee, 2017, The minimal clinically important difference for Knee Society Clinical Rating System after total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 25, 3354, 10.1007/s00167-016-4208-9 Van der Wees, 2017, Patient-reported health outcomes after total hip and knee surgery in a Dutch University Hospital Setting: Results of twenty years clinical registry, BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 18, 97, 10.1186/s12891-017-1455-y Sedaghat, 2019, Understanding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of patient-reported outcome measures, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 161, 551, 10.1177/0194599819852604 Hung, 2018, World J Orthop, 9, 41, 10.5312/wjo.v9.i3.41 Terwee, 2012, Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist, Qual Life Res, 21, 651, 10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1 Marot, 2019, Determination of normal KOOS and WOMAC values in a healthy population, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 27, 541, 10.1007/s00167-018-5153-6