La chirurgie robotique en oncogynécologie

Binder-Foucard F, Belot A, Delafosse P, et al. (2013) Estimation nationale de l’incidence et de la mortalité par cancer en France entre 1980 et 2012. Partie 1 — Tumeurs solides. Synthèse. Saint-Maurice (Fra): Institut de veille sanitaire

Holloway RW, Ahmad S (2012) Robotic-assisted surgery in the management of endometrial cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 38: 1–8

O’Malley DM, Smith B, Fowler JM (2015) The role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer. J Surg Oncol 112: 761–8

Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, et al. (2010) Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 116: 1422–31

Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. (2009) Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 27: 5331–6

Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS, et al. (2009) Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 113: 36–41

Yaribakht S, Guillemin F, Harter V, et al. (2015) New approach of learning curve for robotic-assisted gynecologic oncology surgery. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 43: 348–55

Lim PC, Kang E, Park DH (2011) A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients. Gynecol Oncol 120: 413–8

Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, et al. (2009) A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvicaortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 114: 162–7

Hoekstra AV, Jairam-Thodla A, Rademaker A, et al. (2009) The impact of robotics on practice management of endometrial cancer: transitioning from traditional surgery. Int J Med Robot 5: 392–7

Jung YW, Lee DW, Kim SW, et al. (2010) Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution. J Surg Oncol 101: 116–21

Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al. (2008) A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199: 360.e1–9

Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, et al. (2008) Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol 111: 407–11

DeNardis SA, Holloway RW, Bigsby GE, et al. (2008) Robotically-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 111: 412–7

Brudie LA, Backes FJ, Ahmad S, et al. (2013) Analysis of disease recurrence and survival for women with uterine malignancies undergoing robotic surgery. Gynecol Oncol 128: 309–15

Park HK, Helenowski IB, Berry E, et al. (2015) A comparison of survival and recurrence outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic versus open surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22: 961–7

Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Shepherd A, Momeni M, et al. (2014) Survival analysis of robotic versus traditional laparoscopic surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210: 160.e1–e11

Kilgore JE, Jackson AL, Ko EM, et al. (2013) Recurrence-free and 5-year survival following robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 129: 49–53

Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. (2012) Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J Clin Oncol 30: 695–700

Eklind S, Lindfors A, Sjöli P, et al. (2015) A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma: Int J Gynecol Cancer 25: 250–6

Turner TB, Habib AS, Broadwater G, et al. (2015) Postoperative pain scores and narcotic use in robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer staging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22: 1004–10

Sert BM, Abeler VM (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection — case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 27: 531–3

Kruijdenberg CB, van den Einden LC, Hendriks JC, et al. (2011) Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: a review. Gynecol Oncol 120: 334–9

Zhou J, Xiong BH, Ma L, Cheng Y, et al. (2016) Robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a metaanalysis. Int J Med Robot 12: 145–54. (doi: 10.1002/rcs.1652[Epub 2015 Mar 30])

Asciutto KC, Kalapotharakos G, Löfgren M, et al. (2015) Robotassisted surgery in cervical cancer patients reduces the time to normal activities of daily living. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 94: 260–5

Hoogendam JP, Verheijen RH, Wegner I, et al. (2014) Oncological outcome and long-term complications in robot-assisted radical surgery for early stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study. BJOG 121: 1538–45

Persson J, Kannisto P, Bossmar T (2008) Robot-assisted abdominal laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol 111: 564–7

Burnett AF, Stone PJ, Duckworth LA, et al. (2009) Robotic radical trachelectomy for preservation of fertility in early cervical cancer: case series and description of technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16: 569–72

Ramirez PT, Schmeler KM, Malpica A, et al. (2010) Safety and feasibility of robotic radical trachelectomy in patients with earlystage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 116: 512–5

Persson J, Imboden S, Reynisson P, et al. (2012) Reproducibility and accuracy of robot-assisted laparoscopic fertility sparing radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol 127: 484–8

Magrina JF, Pawlina W, Kho RM, et al. (2011) Robotic nervesparing radical hysterectomy: feasibility and technique. Gynecol Oncol 121: 605–9

Gil-Ibáñez B, Díaz-Feijoo B, Pérez-Benavente A, et al. (2013) Nerve sparing technique in robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy: results. Int J Med Robot 9: 339–44

Narducci F, Collinet P, Merlot B, et al. (2013) Benefit of robotassisted laparoscopy in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: urinary morbidity in early cervical cancer. Surg Endosc 27: 1237–42

Chong GO, Lee YH, Hong DG, et al. (2013) Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a comparison of the intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon’s initial experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer 23: 1145–9

Magrina JF, Magtibay PM (2012) Robotic nerve-sparing radical parametrectomy: feasibility and technique. Int J Med Robot 8: 206–9

Rossi EC, Ivanova A, Boggess JF, (2012) Robotically-assisted fluorescence-guided lymph node mapping with ICG for gynecologic malignancies: a feasibility study. Gynecol Oncol 124: 78–82

Jewell EL, Huang JJ, Abu-Rustum NR, et al. (2014) Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in minimally invasive surgery using indocyanine green and near-infrared fluorescence imaging for uterine and cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 133: 274–7

Plante M, Touhami O, Trinh XB, et al. (2015) Sentinel node mapping with indocyanine green and endoscopic near-infrared fluorescence imaging in endometrial cancer. A pilot study and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 137: 443–7

Imboden S, Papadia A, Nauwerk M, et al. (2015) Lymph node mapping in patients with cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 22: 4198–4203

Buda A, Crivellaro C, Elisei F, et al. (2016) Impact of indocyanine green for sentinel lymph node mapping in early stage endometrial and cervical cancer: comparison with conventional radiotracer 99mTc and/or blue dye. Ann Surg Oncol 2015 [Epub ahead of print]

Siesto G, Romano F, Fiamengo B, et al. (2016) Sentinel node mapping using indocyanine green and near-infrared fluorescence imaging technology for uterine malignancies: preliminary experience with the Da Vinci Xi system. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23: 470–1 (doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.12.013. [Epub 2016 Jan 6])

Classe JM, Rauch P, Rodier JF, et al. (2006) Surgery after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and brachytherapy for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer: morbidity and outcome: results of a multicenter study of the GCCLCC (Groupe des chirurgiens de centre de lutte contre le cancer). Gynecol Oncol 102: 523–9

Ferron G, Querleu D, Martel P, et al. (2006) Laparoscopyassisted vaginal pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol 100: 551–5

Lambaudie E, Narducci F, Leblanc E, et al. (2010) Roboticallyassisted laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical cancer: report of three first cases. Gynecol Oncol 116: 582–3

Davis MA, Adams S, Eun D, et al. (2010) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic exenteration in recurrent cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202: 663.e1

Lim PC (2009) Robotic assisted total pelvic exenteration: a case report. Gynecol Oncol 115: 310–1

Jauffret C, Lambaudie E, Bannier M, et al. (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopy in the management of recurrent pelvic cancer. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 39: 674–80

Puntambekar S, Lawande A, Desai R, et al. (2014) Initial experience of robotic anterior pelvic exenteration at a single institute. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 126: 41–4

Houvenaeghel G, Ghouti L, Moutardier V, et al. (2005) Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in radical oncopelvic surgery: a safe and useful procedure. Eur J Surg Oncol 31: 1185–90

Rabinovich A (2016) Robotic surgery for ovarian cancers: individualization of the surgical approach to select ovarian cancer patients. Int J Med Robot (doi: 10.1002/rcs.1684. [Epub ahead of print])

Al Rawahi T, Lopes AD, Bristow RE, et al. (2013) Surgical cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 28: CD008765

Elattar A, Bryant A, Winter-Roach BA, et al. (2011) Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10: CD007565.

Sinno AK, Fader AN (2014) Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology. Fertil Steril 102: 922–32

Feuer GA, Lakhi N, Barker J, et al. (2013) Perioperative and clinical outcomes in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer using a robotic or abdominal approach. Gynecol Oncol 131: 520–4.

Chen CH, Chiu LH, Chen HH, et al. (2016) Comparison of robotic approach, laparoscopic approach and laparotomy in treating epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Med Robot (doi: 10.1002/rcs.1655. [Epub ahead of print])

Magrina JF, Zanagnolo V, Noble BN, et al. (2011) Robotic approach for ovarian cancer: perioperative and survival results and comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 121: 100–5

Escobar PF, Levinson KL, Magrina J, et al. (2014) Feasibility and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional study. Gynecol Oncol 134: 253–6

Magrina JF, Cetta RL, Chang YH, et al. (2013) Analysis of secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer by robotics, laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 129: 336–40

Minig L, Padilla Iserte P, Zorrero C, et al. (2016) Robotic surgery in women with ovarian cancer: surgical technique and evidence of clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23: 309–16 (doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.10.014. [Epub 2015 Nov 10])

Narducci F, Lambaudie E (2015) Extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy by robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25: 1494–502

Lowery WJ, Leath CA, Robinson RD (2012) Robotic surgery applications in the management of gynecologic malignancies. J Surg Oncol 105: 481–7

Fastrez M, Goffin F, Vergote I, et al. (2013) Multi-center experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92: 895–901

Lambaudie E, Narducci F, Leblanc E, et al. (2012) Roboticallyassisted laparoscopy for para-aortic lymphadenectomy: technical description and results of an initial experience. Surg Endosc 26: 2430–5

Vergote I, Pouseele B, VanGorp T, et al. (2008) Robotic retroperitoneal lower para-aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma first report on the technique used in 5 patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87: 783–7

Magrina JF, Kho R, Montero RP, et al. (2009) Robotic extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy: development of a technique. Gynecol Oncol 113: 32–5

Bats AS, Mimouni M (2014) Robotic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 24: 1486–92

Tinelli R, Malzoni M, Cosentino F, et al. (2011) Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 18: 2622–8

Wisner KP, Gupta S, Ahmad S, et al. (2015) Indications and techniques for robotic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology. J Surg Oncol 112: 782–9

Hudry D, Ahmad S, Zanagnolo V, et al. (2015) Roboticallyassisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results — a cohort study of 487 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25: 504–11