La cesárea del milenio: técnica de Misgav Ladach modificada
Tài liệu tham khảo
Stark, 1994
Pfannenstiel, 1900, Ueber die Vorteile des suprasymphysaeren Fascienquerschnitt fuer die gynaekologische Koliotomien, zugleich ein Beitrag zu der Indikaonsstellung der operation-wege, Samml Klin Vort Gynaek, 268, 68
Richard, 1983
Rodríguez Hidalgo, 1993
Mowat, 2002, Abdominal wound dehiscence after caesarean section, Br Med J, 2, 256, 10.1136/bmj.2.5756.256
Stark, 1994, Comparison between the Joel-Cohen and Pfannenstiel incision in caesarean section, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 53, 121, 10.1016/0028-2243(94)90218-6
Ellis, 1977, Does the peritoneum need to be closed at laparotomy?, Br J Surg, 64, 733, 10.1002/bjs.1800641013
Stark, 1993, Adhesion-free caesarean section [Letter to the Editor], World J Surg, 17, 419, 10.1007/BF01658718
Pawlowicz, 2000, Comparative analysis of Misgav Ladach and Pfannenstiel method for caesarean section in the material fetal-meternal clinical department PMMH-Ribetween1994-1999, Ginakol Pol, 71, 327
Ziemkowicz, 2000, Caesarean section by the Misgav Ladach with the abdominal opening surgery by the Johel Cohen method, Ginakol Pol, 71, 284
Coroso, 2004, Stark's method of caesarean section. Advantages compared to the tradicional method, Minerva Ginecol, 51, 203
Grignaffini, 2004, Innovations of the Stark method for caesarean section. Comparison of techniques, Minerva Ginecol, 51, 475
Escribano, 2004, Comparación de costes de la cesárea y convencional con la incision de Pfannentiel, Prog Obstet Ginecol, 47, 323, 10.1016/S0304-5013(04)76013-6
Magdaleno Dans, 2005, Cesárea de Misgav Ladach. Descripción de la técnica y propuesta de ciertas modificaciones, Cienc Ginecol, 3, 154
Ayres de Campos, 2000, Modifications to the Misgav Ladach technique for cesarean section – and reply, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 79, 326, 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.079004326.x
Li, 2001, Study on modifification of the Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section, J Tongji Med Univ, 21, 75, 10.1007/BF02888044
