L’essentiel sur les méta-analyses
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
PubMed. http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Embase. www.embase.com.
Bases bibliographiques Pascal et Francis. https://pascal-francis.inist.fr/.
Glass, 1976, Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research, Educ Res, 5, 3, 10.3102/0013189X005010003
Laroche, 2015
The Cochrane Collaboration. www.cochrane.org/fr/about-us.
Bréart, 1982, [Comparison of 2 obstetrical attitudes vis-à-vis inducing labor at term, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), 11, 107
Beaufils, 1985, Prevention of pre-eclampsia by early antiplatelet therapy, Lancet, 1, 840, 10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92207-X
Blondel, 1992, Home uterine activity monitoring in France: a randomized, controlled trial, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 167, 424, 10.1016/S0002-9378(11)91423-9
Crowley, 1995, Antenatal corticosteroid therapy: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials, 1972 to 1994, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 173, 322, 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90222-8
Chalmers, 1989
Higgins J, Thomas J. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 6.2. 2021. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current.
Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analysises. 2011. www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
STROBE. www. strobe-statement.org/.
RoB 2 tool. A revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. https://sites.google.com/site/riskofbiastool/welcome/rob-2-0-tool.
Sterne, 2016, ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions, BMJ, 355, i4919, 10.1136/bmj.i4919