Knowledge repositories. In digital knowledge we trust

Aronova, E., K.S. Baker, and N. Oreskes. 2010. Big science and big data in biology: from the international geophysical year through the international biological program to the long term ecological research (LTER) Network, 1957––Present. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 40 (2): 183–224. Bok, S. 1978. Lying: Moral choice in private and public life. New York: Pantheon Books. Baier, A. 1986. Trust and antitrust. Ethics 96 (2): 231–260. Callebaut, W. 2012. Scientific perspectivism: A philosopher of science’s response to the challenge of big data biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1): 69–80. De Grandis, G., and V. Halgunset. 2016. Conceptual and terminological confusion around personalised medicine: a coping strategy. BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1): 43. De Grandis, G. 2020. Fair trade in building digital knowledge repositories: the knowledge economy as if researchers mattered. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-020-09966-z. EfstathiouNydal, S.R., A. Laegreid, and M. Kuiper. 2019. Scientific knowledge in the age of computation Explicated, computable and manageable? Theoria Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 34 (2): 213–236. Gabrielsen, A.M. 2020. Openness and trust in data-intensive science: the case of biocuration. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23 (3): 497–504. Hardwig, J. 1991. The role of trust in knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy 88 (12): 693–708. Hedgecoe, A. 2004. The politics of personalised medicine: Pharmacogenetics in the clinic. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. Hoeyer, K. 2019. Data as promise: Reconfiguring Danish public health through personalized medicine. Social studies of science 49 (4): 531–555. Kuhn, T.S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Leonelli, S. 2016. Data-centric biology: A philosophical study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Luhmann, N. (2000) Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives. In Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, ed. Gambetta, Diego. Electronic edition, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, chapter 6, pp. 94–107. Merton, R.K. 1942. The Normative Structure of Science [1942] reprinted in Merton 1973. The sociology of science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Myskja, B & Steinsbekk, K. (2020) Personalized medicine, digital technology and trust – a Kantian account. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, this issue. Nydal, R., G. Bennett, M. Kuiper, and A. Lægreid. 2020. Silencing trust: confidence and familiarity in re-engineering knowledge infrastructures. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 23 (3): 471–484. Prainsack, B. 2017. Personalized medicine: empowered patients in the 21st century?. New York: NYU Press. Shapin, S. 1994. A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Ursin, L., Ytterhus, B., Christensen, E., & Skolbekken, J. A. (2020) If you give them your little finger, they’ll tear off your entire arm: losing trust in biobank research. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, this issue. Woese, C.R. 2004. A new biology for a new century. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 68 (2): 173–186. Wilkinson, M. D., M. Dumontier, I. J. Aalbersberg, G. Appleton, M. Axton, A. Baak, N. Blomberg, J.-W. Boiten, L. B. da Silva Santos and P. E. Bourne (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data3.