Knowledge and Perceptions in Participatory Policy Processes: Lessons from the Delta-Region in the Netherlands
Tóm tắt
Water resources management issues tend to affect a variety of uses and users. Therefore, they often exhibit complex and unstructured problems. The complex, unstructured nature of these problems originates from uncertain knowledge and from the existence of divergent perceptions among various actors. Consequently, dealing with these problems is not just a knowledge problem; it is a problem of ambiguity too. This paper focuses on a complex, unstructured water resources management issue, the sustainable development—for ecology, economy and society—of the Delta-region of the Netherlands. In several areas in this region the ecological quality decreased due to hydraulic constructions for storm water safety, the Delta Works. To improve the ecological quality, the Dutch government regards the re-establishment of estuarine dynamics in the area as the most important solution. However, re-establishment of estuarine dynamics will affect other uses and other users. Among the affected users are farmers in the surrounding areas, who use freshwater from a lake for agricultural purposes. This problem has been addressed in a participatory decision-making process, which is used as a case study in this paper. We investigate how the dynamics in actors’ perceptions and the knowledge base contribute to the development of agreed upon and valid knowledge about the problem–solution combination, using our conceptual framework for problem structuring. We found that different knowledge sources—expert and practical knowledge—should be integrated to create a context-specific knowledge base, which is scientifically valid and socially robust. Furthermore, we conclude that for the convergence of actors’ perceptions, it is essential that actors learn about the content of the process (cognitive learning) and about the network in which they are involved (strategic learning). Our findings form a plea for practitioners in water resources management to adopt a problem structuring approach in order to deal explicitly with uncertainty and ambiguity.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Blackmore C (2007) What kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas? A theoretical overview. Environ Sci Policy 10(6):512. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2007.02.007
Borger GJ (2004) The Netherlands and the North Sea; a close relationship in historical perspective. Ned Geogr Stud 325:13
Carolan MS (2006) Social change and the adoption and adaptation of knowledge claims: whose truth do you trust in regard to sustainable agriculture? Agric Human Values 23(3):325–339
Colijn CJ, Binnendijk AC (1998) Physical planning in the coastal region of Zeeland, The Netherlands. J Coast Conserv 4(2):135
d’Angremond K (2003) From disaster to Delta Project: the storm flood of 1953. Terra Aqua 90:3
De Bruijn H, Leijten M (2007) Megaprojects and contested information. Transp Plan Technol 30(1):49–69
De Bruijn JA, Ten Heuvelhof EF (1999) Scientific expertise in complex decision-making processes. Sci Public Policy 26(3):179
De Bruijn H, Ten Heuvelhof EF, In ’t Veld RJ (2002) Process management: why project management fails in complex decision making processes. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
De Kruijf J (2007) Problem structuring in interactive decision-making processes: how interaction, problem perceptions and knowledge contribute to a joint formulation of a problem and its solutions. Master thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Denters B, Van Geffen O, Huisman J, Klok PJ (2003) The rise of interactive governance and quasi-markets. Library of public policy and public administration. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, ISSN 1566-7669, p 280
Dery D (1984) Problem definition in policy analysis. Sociology of the sciences, vol 24, ISSN 0167-2320, University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas
Dewulf A, Craps M, Bouwen R, Taillieu T, Pahl-Wostl C (2005) Integrated management of natural resources: dealing with ambiguous issues, multiple actors and diverging frames. Water Sci Technol 52:115–124
Douglas MT, Wildavsky AB (1982) Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley
Edelenbos J, Klijn EH (2005) Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: a comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands. J Public Adm Res Theory 16(3):417–446
Edelenbos J, Monnikhof R, Van de Riet O (2003) A double helix approach: a proposal to forge a better integration of analysis and policy development. Int J Technol Policy Manag 3(1):1–21
Eshuis J, Stuiver M (2005) Learning in context through conflict and alignment: farmers and scientists in search of sustainable agriculture. Agric Human Values 22(2):137–148
Glicken J (2000) Getting stakeholder participation ‘right’: a discussion of participatory processes and possible pitfalls. Environ Sci Policy 3(6):305
Grin J, Hoppe R (1999) Het kan verkeren: Een vergelijkende analyse van de structurering van het automobiliteitsvraagstuk door drie instituten voor parlementaire Technology Assessment. Beleidswetenschap 13(3):260–286 (in Dutch)
Hisschemöller MJ (1993) De democratie van problemen: de relatie tussen de inhoud van beleidsproblemen en methoden van politieke besluitvorming. Ph.D. thesis, VU Uitgeverij, Amsterdam (in Dutch)
Hisschemöller M, Hoppe R (2001) Coping with intractable controversies: the case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis. In: Hisschemöller M, Hoppe R, Dunn WN, Ravetz JR (eds) Knowledge, power, and participation in environmental policy analysis. Transaction, New Brunswick and London, pp 47–72
Hommes S, Hulscher SJMH, Mulder JPM, Otter HS, Bressers JTA (2008) Role of knowledge and perceptions in the impact assessment for the extension of Mainport Rotterdam. Marine Policy. Available online, doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2008.05.006
Innes JE, Booher DE (2003) The impact of collaborative planning on governance capacity. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, USA Working paper 2003-03
Klijn E (2005) Netwerken als perspectief op beleid en uitvoering van beleid—Een overzicht van onderzoek en theorievorming naar netwerken. Beleidswetenschap 4:32–54 (in Dutch)
Kolkman MJ, Kok M, van der Veen A (2005) Mental model mapping as a new tool to analyse the use of information in decision-making in integrated water management. Phys Chem Earth 30(4–5):317–332
Koppenjan JFM, Klijn E (2004) Managing uncertainties in networks: a network approach to problem solving and decision making. Routledge, London
Meijerink SV (2004) Rivierbeheer als leerproces. Een tussentijdse evaluatie van het procesontwerp voor de PKB Ruimte voor de Rivier. Bestuurswetenschappen 5:406–427 (in Dutch)
Ministeries van VROM, LNV, VenW, EZ (2004) Nota Ruimte—Ruimte voor ontwikkeling (National Spatial Strategy). Ministeries van VROM, LNV, VenW, EZ, The Hague (in Dutch)
Mitroff II (1983) Stakeholders of the organizational mind. Towards a new view of organizational policy making. Jossy-Bass, London
Mostert E (2003) The challenge of public participation. Water Policy 5(2):179
Nowotny H (2003) Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge. Sci Public Policy 30(3):151
Orr P, Colvin J, King D (2007) Involving stakeholders in integrated river basin planning in England and Wales. Water Resour Manag 21(1):331
Pahl-Wostl C (2002) Participative and stakeholder-based policy design, evaluation and modeling processes. Integrated Assessment 3(1):3–14
Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour Manag 21(1):49
Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Tabara D, Taillieu T (2007) Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society 12(2):5
Provincie Zuid-Holland, Provincie Zeeland, Provincie Noord-Brabant (2003) De Delta in Zicht—Een integrale visie op de Deltawateren. Project Integral Vision Deltawateren, Zeeland, The Netherlands (in Dutch)
Quade ES (1980) Pitfalls in formulation and modeling. In: Majone G, Quade ES (eds) Pitfalls of analysis. Wiley, Chichester, pp 23–43
Reijs TAM (2006a) Informatie ten behoeve van fundamentele discussie zoetwatersituatie ZW-Delta: Pilot Tholen/St. Philipsland. TNO Bouw en ondergrond, Innovatie en Ruimte, Delft (in Dutch)
Reijs TAM (2006b) Verslag en resultaten van de brede discussie zoetwatersituatie voor de landbouw in de Delta: Pilot Tholen & St. Philipsland. TNO Bouw en Ondergrond, Innovatie en Ruimte, Delft (in Dutch)
Rein M, Schön DA (1993) Reframing policy discourse. In: Fischer F, Forester J (eds) The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. UCL, London, p 145
Rinaudo JD, Garin P (2005) The benefits of combining lay and expert input for water-management planning at the watershed level. Water Policy 7(3):279
Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169
Sabatier PA (1988) An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sci 21(2–3):129
Sabatier PA, Jenkins-Smith HC (1993) Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Westview, Boulder, CO
Schön DA, Rein M (1994) Frame reflection: toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. Basic Books, New York, NY
Stuyt LCPM, Bakel PJTV, Kroes JG, Bos EJ, Elst MVd, Pronk B, Rijk PJ, Clevering OA, Dekking AJG, Voort MPJVd, Wolf MD, Brandenburg WA (2006) Transitie en toekomst van de Deltalandbouw; indicatoren voor de ontwikkeling van de land- en tuinbouw in de Zuidwestelijke Delta van Nederland. Alterra, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Sultana P, Thompson P, Green C (2008) Can England learn lessons from Bangladesh in introducing participatory floodplain management? Water Resour Manag 22(3):357
Termeer C (1993) Dynamiek en inertie rondom mestbeleid: een studie naar veranderingsprocessen in het varkenshouderijnetwerk. VUGA, The Hague
Turnhout E, Leroy P (2004) Participeren in onzekerheid—Literatuuronderzoek naar het inzetten van participatie in wetenschappelijke beleidsadvisering. RIVM Rapport 550002008/2004, in opdracht van: RIVM, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands (in Dutch)
Van Ast JA, Boot SP (2003) Participation in European water policy. Phys Chem Earth 28(12–13):555
Van Bueren EM, Klijn EH, Koppenjan JFM (2003) Dealing with wicked problems in networks: analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective. J Public Adm Res Theory 13(2):193
Van Buuren MW (2006) Competente besluitvorming—Het management van meervoudige kennis in ruimtelijke ontwikkelingsprocessen. Ph.D. thesis (in Dutch)
Van Buuren A, Edelenbos J (2005) ‘Polderen over de feiten’: waar komt het vandaan en wat levert het op? In: Broekhans B, Popkema M, Boersma K (eds) Kennis-vragen in de polder. Jaarboek Kennissamenleving Deel 1. Aksant, Amsterdam, pp 203–232 (in Dutch)
Van Buuren A, Edelenbos J, Klijn E (2004) Managing knowledge in policy networks—organizing joint fact-finding in the Scheldt Estuary. International Conference on Democratic Network Governance, Copenhagen
Van de Graaf H, Hoppe R (1996) Beleid en politiek: een inleiding tot de beleidswetenschap en de beleidskunde, 3e dr; 1e dr.: 1989. Coutinho, Bussum (in Dutch)
Van de Riet AWT (2003) Policy analysis in multi-actor policy settings: navigating between negotiated nonsense and superfluous knowledge. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft, Eburon, Delft
van der Keur P, Henriksen HJ, Refsgaard JC, Brugnach M, Pahl-Wostl C, Dewulf A, Buiteveld H (2008) Identification of major sources of uncertainty in current IWRM practice. Illustrated for the rhine basin. Water Resour Manag 1–32. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9248-6
Walker WE, Harremoës P, Rotmans J, Van der Sluijs JP, Van Asselt MBA, Janssen P, Krayer vond Krauss MP (2003) Defining uncertainty—a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrated Assessment 4(1):5–17
White HC (1992) Identity and control: a structural theory of social action. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Wiering MA, Driessen PPJ (2001) Beyond the art of diking: interactive policy on river management in The Netherlands. Water Policy 3(4):283–296
Yin RK (2003) Case study research—design and methods, 3rd edn. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi