Knowledge and Asymmetric Loss
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Brown, Jessica. 2006. Contextualism and warranted assertibility manoeuvres. Philosophical Studies 130 (3): 407–435.
Buckwalter, Wesley. 2010. Knowledge isn’t closed on Saturday. A study in ordinary language. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (3): 395–406.
Brown, Jessica. 2014. The mystery of stakes and error in ascriber intuitions. In Advances in Experimental Epistemology, ed. J.R. Beebe, 145–173. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Buckwalter, Wesley, and Jonathan Schaffer. 2015. Knowledge, stakes, and mistakes. Noûs 49 (2): 201–234.
Builes, David; Sophie Horowitz and Miriam Schoenfield (2020), “Dilating and contracting arbitrarily”, Noûs, Early View.
Christoffersen, Peter F., and Francis X. Diebold. 1997. Optimal prediction under asymmetric loss. Econometric Theory 13 (6): 808–817.
Cohen, Stewart. 2008. Ascriber contextualism. In The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism, ed. J. Greco, 415–436. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DeRose, Keith (2009), The Case for Contextualism (Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Dimmock, Paul. 2018. Strange-but-true. A (quick) new argument for contextualism about ‘know’. Philosophical Studies 175 (8): 2005–2015.
Dinges, Alexander. 2018. Anti-intellectualism, egocentrism and bank case intuitions. Philosophical Studies 175 (11): 2841–2857.
Dinges, Alexander (2020), “Knowledge and non-traditional factors. Prospects for doxastic accounts”, Synthese.
Dinges, Alexander and Julia Zakkou (2020), “Much at stake in knowledge”, Mind & Language, Early View: 1–21.
Dorst, Kevin and Matthew Mandelkern (forthcoming), “Good guesses”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Fantl, Jeremy and Matthew McGrath (2002), “Evidence, pragmatics, and justification”, The Philosophical Review, 111/1: 67–94.
Fantl, Jeremy, and Matthew McGrath. 2009. Knowledge in an Uncertain World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Francis, Kathryn B., Philip Beaman, and Nat Hansen. 2019. Stakes, scales, and skepticism. Ergo 6 (16): 427–487.
Gerken, Mikkel. 2017. On Folk Epistemology: How We Think and Talk about Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harris, Adam J. L. and Adam Corner (2011), “Communicating environmental risks. Clarifying the severity effect in interpretations of verbal probability expressions”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37/6: 1571–1578.
Harris, Adam J.L., Adam Corner, and Ulrike Hahn. 2009. Estimating the probability of negative events. Cognition 110 (1): 51–64.
Harris, Adam J.L., Laura de Molière, Melinda Soh, et al. 2017. Unrealistic comparative optimism. An unsuccessful search for evidence of a genuinely motivational bias. PloS one 12 (3): 1–35.
Hawthorne, John. 2004. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Horowitz, Sophie. 2019. Accuracy and educated guesses. In Oxford Studies in Epistemology, volume 6, ed. T. Szabó Gendler and J. Hawthorne, 85–113. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ichikawa, Jonathan Jenkins, Benjamin Jarvis, and Katherine Rubin. 2012. Pragmatic encroachment and belief-desire psychology. Analytic Philosophy 53 (4): 327–343.
Khoo, Justin (2017), “The disagreement challenge to contextualism”, in J. J. Ichikawa (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism (New York, NY: Routledge).
Kukla, Rebecca. 2015. Delimiting the proper scope of epistemology. Philosophical Perspectives 29 (1): 202–216.
MacFarlane, John. 2014. Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nagel, Jennifer. 2008. Knowledge ascriptions and the psychological consequences of changing stakes. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (2): 279–294.
Patton, Andrew J., and Allan Timmermann. 2007. Properties of optimal forecasts under asymmetric loss and nonlinearity. Journal of Econometrics 140 (2): 884–918.
Pinillos, Nestor Ángel. 2012. Knowledge, experiments and practical interests. In Knowledge Ascriptions, ed. J. Brown and M. Gerken, 192–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pinillos, Nestor Ángel, and Shawn Simpson. 2014. Experimental evidence supporting anti-intellectualism about knowledge. In Advances in Experimental Epistemology, ed. J.R. Beebe, 9–44. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Rose, David, Edouard Machery, Stephen Stich, et al. 2019. Nothing at stake in knowledge. Noûs 53 (1): 224–247.
Rubin, Katherine. 2015. Total pragmatic encroachment and epistemic permissiveness. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (1): 12–38.
Shin, Joseph. 2014. Time constraints and pragmatic encroachment on knowledge. Episteme 11 (2): 157–180.
Sripada, Chandra Sekhar, and Jason Stanley. 2012. Empirical tests of interest-relative invariantism. Episteme 9 (1): 3–26.
Stanley, Jason (2005), Knowledge and Practical Interests (Short Philosophical Books, Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Turri, John. 2017. Epistemic contextualism. An idle hypothesis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (1): 141–156.
Turri, John, and Wesley Buckwalter. 2017. Descartes’s schism, Locke’s reunion. Completing the pragmatic turn in epistemology. American Philosophical Quarterly 54 (1): 25–46.
Turri, John, Wesley Buckwalter, and David Rose. 2016. Actionability judgments cause knowledge judgments. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (3): 212–222.
Turri, John, and Ori Friedman. 2014. Winners and loosers in the folk epistemology of lotteries. In Advances in Experimental Epistemology, ed. J.R. Beebe, 45–69. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Weatherson, Brian. 2005. Can we do without pragmatic encroachment? Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1): 417–443.
Weatherson, Brian. 2017. Interest-relative invariantism. In The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism, ed. J.J. Ichikawa, 240–254. New York, NY: Routledge.
Weber, Elke U. 1994. From subjective probabilities to decision weights. The effect of asymmetric loss functions on the evaluation of uncertain outcomes and events. Psychological Bulletin 115 (2): 228–242.
Weisberg, Jonathan. 2013. Knowledge in action. Philosophers’ Imprint 22: 1–23.