Kinematic Analysis of an Under-actuated, Closed-loop Front-end Assembly of a Dragline Manipulator
Tóm tắt
Dragline excavators are closed-loop mining manipulators that operate using a rigid multilink framework and rope and rigging system, which constitute its front-end assembly. The arrangements of dragline front-end assembly provide the necessary motion of the dragline bucket within its operating radius. The assembly resembles a five-link closed kinematic chain that has two independent generalized coordinates of drag and hoist ropes and one dependent generalized coordinate of dump rope. Previous models failed to represent the actual closed loop of dragline front-end assembly, nor did they describe the maneuverability of dragline ropes under imposed geometric constraints. Therefore, a three degrees of freedom kinematic model of the dragline front-end is developed using the concept of generalized speeds. It contains all relevant configuration and kinematic constraint conditions to perform complete digging and swinging cycles. The model also uses three inputs of hoist and drag ropes linear and a rotational displacement of swinging along their trajectories. The inverse kinematics is resolved using a feedforward displacement algorithm coupled with the Newton-Raphson method to accurately estimate the trajectories of the ropes. The trajectories are solved only during the digging phase and the singularity was eliminated using Baumgarte’s stabilization technique (BST), with appropriate inequality constraint equations. It is shown that the feedforward displacement algorithm can produce accurate trajectories without the need to manually solve the inverse kinematics from the geometry. The research findings are well in agreement with the dragline real operational limits and they contribute to the efficiency and the reduction in machine downtime due to better control strategies of the dragline cycles.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Komatsu Company. Available: https://mining.komatsu/surface-mining/draglines, 2019.
G. Lurmey, M. McKee. Mining for Efficiency, Technical Report (Mining Intelligence & Benchmarking), Pricewa-terhouse Coopers, Sydney, Australia, 2014.
R. A. Carter. Moving and maintaining the world’s biggest diggers. Engineering & Mining Journal, vol. 216, no. 11, pp. 40–59, 2015.
A. K. Kemp. Computerized system analyzed dragline performance prints out data. Coal Age, vol. 79, no. 9, pp. 92–97, 1974.
C. E. McCoy Jr, L. J. Crowgey. Anti-tightline control system for draglines used in the surface mining industry. In Proceedings of Conference Record, Industry Applications Society, IEEE-IAS Annual Meeting, Behrend College Graduate Center, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 140–145, 1980.
N. Godfrey, A. Susanto. Partial automation of a dragline working in conjunction with a hopper/crusher/conveyor overburden removal system. In Proceedings of the fifteenth Large Open Pit Mining Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, USA, 1980.
H. L. Hartman. Introductory Mining Engineering, New York, USA: Wiley, Article number 633, 1987.
D. K. Haneman, H. Hayes, G. I. Lumley. Dragline performance evaluations for tarong coal using physical modelling. In Proceedings of the Third Large Open Pit Mining Conference, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Mackay, Australia, 1992.
S. W. P. Esterhuyse. The Influence of Geometry on Dragline Bucket Filling Performance, Master dissertation, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 1997.
P. F. Knights, D. H. Shanks. Dragline productivity improvements through short-term monitoring. In Proceedings of Institution of Engineers, Coal Handling and Utilization Conference, Sydney, Australia, pp. 100–103, 1990.
P. Corke, J. Roberts, G. Winstanley. Experiments and experiences in developing a large robot mining system. Experimental Robotics VI, P. Corke, J. Trevelyan, Ed., London, UK: Springer, pp. 183–192, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0119397.
J. Roberts, G. Winstanley, P. Corke. Three-dimensional imaging for a very large excavator. The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 22, no. 7–8, pp. 467–477, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02783649030227003.
J. Kyle, M. Costello. Comparison of measured and simulated motion of a scaled dragline excavation system. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 44, no. 9–10, pp. 816–833, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2006.02.015.
T. Yang, N. Sun, H. Chen, Y. C. Fang. Neural network-based adaptive antiswing control of an underactuated ship-mounted crane with roll motions and input dead zones. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, to be published. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2910580.
H. J. Yang, M. Tan. Sliding mode control for flexible-link manipulators based on adaptive neural networks. International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol 15, no. 2, pp. 239–248, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-018-1122-2.
G. W. Zhang, P. Yang, J. Wang, J. J. Sun, Y. Zhang. Integrated observer-based fixed-time control with backstepping method for exoskeleton robot. International Journal of Automation and Computing, to be published. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-019-1201-z.
M. Ponnusamy, T. Maity. Recent advancements in dragline control systems. Journal of Mining Science, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 160–168, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106273911601025X.
Y. Liu, M. S. Hasan, H. N. Yu. Modelling and remote control of an excavator. International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 349–358, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-010-0514-8.
X. M. Niu, G. Q. Gao, X. J. Liu, Z. D. Bao. Dynamics and control of a novel 3-DOF parallel manipulator with actuation redundancy. International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 552–562, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-013-0753-6.
N. Demirel, S. Frimpong. Dragline dynamic modelling for efficient excavation. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 4–20, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930802091166.
Y. Li, W. Y. Liu. Dynamic dragline modeling for operation performance simulation and fatigue life prediction. Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 34, pp. 93–101, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.07.020.
T. R. Kane, D. A. Levinson. Dynamics: Theory and Applications, New York, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1985.
A. K. Banerjee. Flexible Multibody Dynamics: Efficient Formulations and Applications, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, 2016.
M. Wardeh. Computational Dynamics and Virtual Dragline Simulation for Extended Rope Service Life, Ph. D. dissertation, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, USA, 2018.
J. Baumgarte. Stabilization of constraints and integrals of motion in dynamical systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 1972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(72)90018-7.