Killing by Autonomous Vehicles and the Legal Doctrine of Necessity

Filippo Santoni de Sio1
1Department Ethics/Philosophy of Technology, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5 - 2628BX, Delft, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alexander L, Moore MS (2015) Deontological Ethics. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/ethics-deontological/

Asaro P (2011) A body to kick, but still no soul to damn: legal perspectives on robotics. In: Lin P, Abney K, Bekey GA (eds) Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 169–186

Austin JL (1956) A Plea for excuses. In: J.L. Austin (1961) Philosophical papers, edited by J.O. Urmson and G.J. Warnock. Oxford, Oxford University Press

Bonnefon JF, Shariff A, Rahwan I (2016) The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science 352(6293):1573–1576. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2654

Christie GC (1999) The defense of necessity considered from the legal and moral points of view. Duke Law J 48(5):975–1042

Cohan J (2006) Homicide by necessity. Chapman Law Review 10(1):119–185

Dennis IH (2009) On necessity as a defence to crime: possibilities, problems and the limits of justification and excuse. Crim Law Philos 3(1):29–49

Eagle v Chambers (2004) rtr 9

Fletcher GP (2000) Rethinking criminal law. Oxford University Press, New York

Foot P (1967) The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review 5:5–15

Gerdes JC, Thornton SM (2015) Implementable ethics for autonomous vehicles. In: Maurer M, Gerdes JC, Lenz B, Winner H (eds) Autonomes Fahren. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 87–102. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-662-45854-9_5

Goddard & Walker v Greenwood (2003) RTR 10

Harris J (1975) The survival lottery. Philosophy 50(191):81–87. doi: 10.1017/S0031819100059118

Hart HLA (1961) The concept of law. Clarendon, Oxford

Latta v. New Orleans & N.W. Ry (1912) 59 So. 250

Lin P (2015) Why ethics matters for autonomous cars. In: Maurer M, Gerdes JC, Lenz B, Winner H (eds) Autonomes Fahren. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 69–85. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-45854-9_4

Matthias A (2004) The responsibility gap: ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics Inf Technol 6(3):175–183. doi: 10.1007/s10676-004-3422-1

McSherry B (2002) The doctrine of necessity and medical treatment. J Law Med 10(1):10–16

Model Penal Code (1958). Tentative Draft No 8

Moore MS (1997) Placing blame: a general theory of the criminal law. Clarendon Press, Oxford

Moore MS (2010) Act and crime: the philosophy of action and its implications for criminal law. Oxford University Press, New York

Norrie A (2014) Crime, reason and history. Cambridge University Press, New York

Nyholm S, Smids J (2016) The ethics of accident-algorithms for self-driving cars: an applied trolley problem? Ethical Theory Moral Pract 19(5):1275–1289. doi: 10.1007/s10677-016-9745-2

Pagallo U (2013) The Laws of Robots: Crimes, Contracts, and Torts. Springer, Dordrecht

Quinn W (1989) Actions, intentions, and consequences: the doctrine of double effect. Philos Public Aff 18(4):334–351

R v Dudley and Stephens (1884) 14 QBD 273 DC

R v Longbottom (1849) 3 Cox 439

R v Swindall and Osborne (1846) 2 Car & Kir 230

Re A (conjoined twins) (2001) 2 WLR 480

Robinson PH (1975) A theory of justification: societal harm as a prerequisite for criminal liability. 23 UCLA L. Rev 23:266–292

Ruiz v Forman (1974) 514 S.W.2d 817

SAE Information Report (J3016) (n.d.) Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems

Santoni de Sio F (2016) Ethics and self-driving cars: a white paper on responsible innovation in automated driving systems. Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment Rijkswaterstaat

Singer P (1977) Utility and the survival lottery. Philosophy 52(200):218–222

Smith JC (1989) Justification and excuse in the criminal law, Sweet & Maxwell, London

Smith, BW (2015) Regulation and the Risk of Inaction In: Maurer M, Gerdes JC, Lenz B, Winner H (eds) Autonomes Fahren, Springer, Berlin pp 593–609 http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-662-45854-9_27#page-1

Sparrow R (2007) Killer Robots. J Appl Philos 24(1):62–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00346.x

State v. Scribner (2002) 72 Conn. App 736

Taurek JM (1977) Should the numbers count? Philos Public Aff 6(4):293–316

Thomson JJ (1985) The trolley problem. The Yale Law Journal 94(6):1395–1415. doi: 10.2307/796133

Thomson JJ (1986) Rights, restitution and risk: Essays in moral theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Thomson JJ (1990) The realm of rights. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

United States v. Holmes (1842) 26 F. Cas. 360 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1842)

Wood A (2011). Humanity as end in itself. In: Scheffler S (ed) On What Matters (Vol. 2). Oxford University Press, New York. http://oxfordindex.oup.com/view/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199572816.003.0003