Key structural forest connectors can be identified by combining landscape spatial pattern and network analyses

Adriaensen, 2003, The application of ‘least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model, Landsc. Urban Plann., 64, 233, 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00242-6 Bailey, 2007, Increasing connectivity in fragmented landscapes: an investigation of evidence for biodiversity gain in woodlands, Forest Ecol. Manage., 238, 7, 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.049 Bodin, 2010, Ranking individual habitat patches as connectivity providers: integrating network analysis and patch removal experiments, Ecol. Model., 221, 2393, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.06.017 2006 Dubois, 1994, Dispersal patterns of Corsican mouflon ewes: importance of age and proximate influences, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 42, 29, 10.1016/0168-1591(94)90004-3 Ferrari, 2007, Two measures of landscape-graph connectivity: assessment across gradients in area and configuration, Landsc. Ecol., 22, 1315, 10.1007/s10980-007-9121-7 Forman, 1995 García-Feced, 2011, Improving landscape connectivity in forest districts: a two-stage process for prioritizing agricultural patches for reforestation, Forest Ecol. Manage., 261, 154, 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.09.047 Harrison, 1999, Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation: what do we know for sure?, Ecography, 22, 225, 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00496.x Hernando, 2010, Quantitatively defining the conservation status of Natura 2000 forest habitats and improving management options for enhancing biodiversity, Biodivers. Conserv., 19, 2221, 10.1007/s10531-010-9835-8 Hernando, 2010, Object based image analysis for mapping Natura 2000 sites to improve forest management, 120 Hodgson, 2009, Climate change, connectivity and conservation decision making: back to basics, J. Appl. Ecol., 46, 964, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01695.x King, 2002, Dispersal success on spatially structured landscapes: when do spatial pattern and dispersal behavior really matter?, Ecol. Model., 147, 23, 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00400-8 2008 Laurance, 2007, Habitat fragmentation, variable edge effects, and the landscape-divergence hypothesis, PLoS ONE, 2, e1017, 10.1371/journal.pone.0001017 Manning, 2009, Scattered trees: a complementary strategy for facilitating adaptive responses to climate change in modified landscapes?, J. Appl. Ecol., 46, 915, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01657.x Matthysen, 2005, Density-dependent dispersal in birds and mammals, Ecography, 28, 403, 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04073.x Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, 1997–2007. Tercer Inventario Forestal Nacional, Dirección General para la Biodiversidad, Madrid, Spain. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, 2006. Conservación de Especies Amenazadas, Invertebrados, Artrópodos de la Directiva Hábitats: Lucanus cervus, Dirección General para la Biodiversidad, Madrid, Spain. Pascual-Hortal, 2006, Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation, Landsc. Ecol., 21, 959, 10.1007/s10980-006-0013-z Ray, 2005, Pathmatrix: a geographical information system tool to compute effective distances among samples, Mol. Ecol. Notes, 5, 177, 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00843.x Rayfield, B., Fortin, M.J., Fall, A., 2011. Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures. Ecology, doi:10.1890/09-2190.1. Rey Benayas, 2008, Creating woodland islets to reconcile ecological restoration, conservation, and agricultural land use, Front. Ecol. Environ., 6, 329, 10.1890/070057 Rosenvald, 2008, For what, when, and where is green-tree retention better than clear-cutting? A review of the biodiversity aspects, Forest Ecol. Manage., 255, 1, 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.016 Saura, 2010, Measuring connectivity in habitat mosaics: the equivalence of two existing network indices and progress beyond them, Commun. Ecol., 11, 217, 10.1556/ComEc.11.2010.2.10 Saura, 2010, A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape, Ecography, 33, 523 Saura, 2011, Network analysis to assess landscape connectivity trends: application to European forests (1990–2000), Ecol. Indic., 11, 407, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.06.011 Saura, 2009, Conefor Sensinode 2.2: a software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity, Environ. Model. Softw., 24, 135, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.05.005 Saura, 2007, A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study, Landsc. Urban Plann., 83, 91, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.03.005 Soille, 2009, Morphological segmentation of binary patterns, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 30, 456, 10.1016/j.patrec.2008.10.015 Tischendorf, 2000, On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity, Oikos, 90, 7, 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900102.x Vogt, 2007, Mapping landscape corridors, Ecol. Indic., 7, 481, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.11.001 Vogt, 2007, Mapping spatial patterns with morphological image processing, Landsc. Ecol., 22, 171, 10.1007/s10980-006-9013-2 Vogt, 2009, Mapping functional connectivity, Ecol. Indic., 9, 64, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.01.011 Wang, 2010, Contemporary pollen flow and mating patterns of a subtropical canopy tree Eurycorymbus cavaleriei in a fragmented agricultural landscape, Forest Ecol. Manage., 260, 2180, 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.09.016 Williams, 2005, Spatial attributes and reserve design models: a review, Environ. Model. Assess., 10, 163, 10.1007/s10666-005-9007-5 With, 1997, Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments, Oikos, 78, 151, 10.2307/3545811