Key CDO functions for successful digital transformation: Insights from a Delphi study

Elsevier BV - Tập 181 - Trang 121773 - 2022
Jose Berbel-Vera1, Mercedes Barrachina Palanca2, Maria Beatriz Gonzalez-Sanchez3
1Universitat de València and Centro Universitario EDEM-Escuela de Empresarios, Valencia, Spain
2Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain
3ECOBAS, Universidade de Vigo, Orense, Spain

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adner, 2003, Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities, Strateg. Manag. J., 24, 1011, 10.1002/smj.331 Aengenheyster, 2017, Real-time Delphi in practice —a comparative analysis of existing software-based tools, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 118, 15, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.023 Annarelli, 2021, Literature review on digitalization capabilities: co-citation analysis of antecedents, conceptualization and consequences, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 166, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120635 Beiderbeck, 2021, Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements, MethodsX, 8, 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101401 Beiderbeck, 2021, The impact of COVID-19 on the European football ecosystem – a Delphi-based scenario analysis technological forecasting and, Soc. Chang., 165 Bharadwaj, 2013, Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights, MIS Q., 471, 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3 Bonaccorsi, 2020, Expert biases in technology foresight. Why they are a problem and how to mitigate them, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 151, 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119855 Christie, 2005, The Delphi technique as a method for increasing inclusion in the evaluation process, Can. J. Program Eval., 20, 105, 10.3138/cjpe.020.005 Dong, 2016, Generative sensing: a design perspective on the microfoundations of sensing capabilities, Calif. Manag. Rev., 58, 97, 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.97 Earley, 2017, The evolving role of the CDO, IT Professional, 19, 64, 10.1109/MITP.2017.4 Etikan, 2017, Sampling and sampling methods, Biometrics Biostat Int. J., 5, 00149 Fitzgerald, 2014, Embracing digital technology: a new strategic imperative, MIT Sloan Manag. Rev., 55, 1 Flostrand, 2020, The Delphi technique in forecasting– a 42-year bibliographic analysis (1975–2017), Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 150, 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119773 Giannarou, 2014, Using Delphi technique to build consensus in practice, Int. J. Bus. Sci. Appl. Manag., 9, 65 Gnatzy, 2011, Validating an innovative real-time Delphi approach - a methodological comparison between real-time and conventional Delphi studies, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 78, 1681, 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.006 Gong, 2021, Developing a unified definition of digital transformation, Technovation, 102, 10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102217 Gordon, 2006, RT Delphi: an efficient, “round-less” almost real time Delphi method, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 73, 321, 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.005 Gordon, 2020, 50 Years of corporate and organizational foresight: looking back and going forward, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 154, 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119966 Häder, 2002 Haffke, 2016, The Role of the CIO and the CDO in an organization’s digital transformation Hakan, 2011, CIPP evaluation model scale: development, reliability and validity, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 15, 592, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.146 Hansen, 2011, Rapid adaptation in digital transformation: a participatory process for engaging IS and business leaders, MIS Q. Exec., 10 Hasson, 2011, Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 78, 1695, 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005 Hasson, 2000, Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique, J. Adv. Nurs., 32, 1008, 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x Hess, 2016, Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy, MIS Q. Exec., 15, 123 Hilbert, 2009, Foresight tools for participative policy-making in inter-governmental processes in developing countries: lessons learned from the eLAC policy priorities Delphi, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 76, 880, 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.01.001 Horlacher, 2016, Co-creating value: the dyadic CDO-CIO relationship during the digital transformation Horlacher, 2016, What does a chief digital officer do? Managerial tasks and roles of a new C-level position in the context of digital transformation, 5126 Kavoura, 2016, Applying Delphi method for strategic design of social entrepreneurship, Libr. Rev., 65, 185, 10.1108/LR-06-2015-0062 Keil, 2013, Understanding the most critical skills for managing IT projects: a Delphi study of IT project managers, Inf. Manag., 50, 398, 10.1016/j.im.2013.05.005 Kiron, 2016, Aligning the organization for its digital future, MIT Sloan Manag. Rev., 58 Kokshagina, 2021, Managing shifts to value-based healthcare and value digitalization as a multi-level dynamic capability development process, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 172, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121072 Linde, 2021, Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration A capability-based framework for smart city innovation initiatives, Tech. Forcasting Soc. Chang., 166 Liu, 2011, Resource fit in digital transformation: lessons learned from the CBC Bank global e-banking project, Manag. Decis., 49, 1728, 10.1108/00251741111183852 Markmann, 2020, Improving the question formulation in Delphi-like surveys: analysis of the effects of abstract language and amount of information on response behavior, Futures Foresight Science, 1 Matt, 2015, Digital transformation strategies, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng., 57, 339, 10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5 Mullen, 2003, Delphi: myths and reality, J. Health Org. Manag., 17, 37, 10.1108/14777260310469319 North, 2019, Promoting digitally enabled growth in SMEs: a framework proposal, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., 33, 238, 10.1108/JEIM-04-2019-0103 Okoli, 2004, The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications, Inf. Manag., 42, 15, 10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002 Osborne, 2003, What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 40, 692, 10.1002/tea.10105 Rezaei, 2021, Key indicators of ethical challenges in digital healthcare: a combined Delphi exploration and confirmative factor analysis approach with evidence from Khorasan province in Iran, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 167, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120724 Roßmann, 2018, The future and social impact of big data analytics in supply chain management: results from a Delphi study, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 130, 135, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.005 Sambamurthy, 2000, Research commentary: the organizing logic for an enterprise's IT activities in the digital era – a prognosis of practice and a call for research, Inf. Syst. Res., 11, 105, 10.1287/isre.11.2.105.11780 Schmidt, 1997, Managing Delphi surveys using non-parametric statistical techniques, Decis. Sci., 28, 763, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01330.x Singh, 2017, How chief digital officers promote the digital transformation of their companies, MIS Q. Exec., 16, 1 Singh, 2020, How do chief digital officers pursue digital transformation activities? The role of organization design parameters, Long Range Plan., 53, 10.1016/j.lrp.2019.07.001 Skulmoski, 2007, The Delphi method for graduate research, J. Information Technol. Educ. Res., 6, 1, 10.28945/199 Teece, 2007, Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance, Strateg. Manag. J., 28, 1319, 10.1002/smj.640 Tumbas, 2017, Three types of chief digital officers and the reasons organizations adopt the role, MIS Q. Exec., 16 Vial, 2019, Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 28, 118, 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003 Warner, 2019, Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: an ongoing process of strategic renewal, Long Range Plan., 52, 326, 10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001 Warth, 2013, A dissent-based approach for multi-stakeholder scenario development—the future of electric drive vehicles, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 80, 566, 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.005 Winkler, 2016, Biases in future-oriented Delphi studies: a cognitive perspective, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 105, 63, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.021