Just Procedures with Controversial Outcomes: On the Grounds for Substantive Disputation within a Procedural Theory of Justice
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Brettschneider, Corey. 2005. Balancing procedures and outcomes within democratic theory: Core values and judicial review. Political Studies 53: 423–441.
Ceva, Emanuela. 2007. Plural values and heterogeneous situations: Considerations on the scope for a political theory of justice. European Journal of Political Theory 6: 359–375.
Ceva, Emanuela. 2008. Impure procedural justice and the management of conflicts about values. Polish Journal of Philosophy 2: 5–22.
Cohen, Joshua. 1994. Pluralism and proceduralism. Chicago-Kent Law Review 69: 589–618.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking rights seriously. London: Duckworth.
Estlund, David. 2007. Democratic authority: A philosophical framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Faitini, Tiziana, and Alessadroantonio Povino. 2008. Handling religious diversity: The case of ‘holy/rest days’ in Italy. Human Affairs 18: 23–36.
Griffin, Christopher G. 2003. Democracy as a non-instrumentally just procedure. The Journal of Political Philosophy 11: 111–121.
Gustafsson, Martin. 2004. On Rawls’s distinction between perfect and imperfect procedural justice. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34: 300–305.
Hampshire, Stuart. 1999. Justice is conflict. London: Duckworth.
McCarthy, Thomas. 1992. Practical discourse: On the relation of morality to politics. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. Calhoun Craig. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rawls, John. 1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Raz, Joseph. 1979. The authority of law: Essays on law and morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rosenfeld, Michael. 1998. A pluralist critique of contractarian proceduralism. Ratio Juris 11: 291–319.