Động lực chung của quá trình hội nhập kinh tế và pháp lý trong Liên minh Châu Âu

Jean-Yves Pitarakis1, George Tridimas2
1Reader in Economics, Department of Economics, University of Southampton, Highfield, UK
2Reader in Public Policy (Economics), School of Economics and Politics, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim

Tóm tắt

Chúng tôi đánh giá các mối liên kết nhân quả giữa quá trình hội nhập kinh tế và pháp lý đã đặc trưng cho sự hình thành của Liên minh Châu Âu. Cụ thể, sử dụng tần suất các tham chiếu quốc gia cho các phán quyết sơ bộ gửi đến Tòa án Công lý Châu Âu như một thước đo của quá trình hội nhập pháp lý, chúng tôi nghiên cứu động lực chung của nó với sự mở rộng thương mại nội khối EU trong thời gian từ 1960 đến 1998. Mục tiêu của chúng tôi là kiểm tra một cách chính thức xem liệu có tồn tại bất kỳ liên kết nào như vậy và hướng mà chúng đã hoạt động.

Từ khóa

#hội nhập kinh tế #hội nhập pháp lý #Liên minh Châu Âu #Tòa án Công lý Châu Âu #thương mại nội khối

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alter, K. J. (1996). “The European Court's Political Power.” West European Politics. 19, 458-487.

Alter, K. J. (1998). “Who are the “Masters of the Treaty”? European Governments and the European Court of Justice.” International Organisation. 52, 121-147.

Alter, K. J. (2000). “The European Union's Legal System and Domestic Policy: Slipover or Backlash?” Interna-tional Organisation. 54, 489-518.

Barro, R. J. (1997). Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross Country Empirical Study, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Burley, A.-M. & Mattli, W. (1993). “Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration.” Interna-tional Organization. 47, 41-76.

Caporale, G. M. & Pittis, N. (2001). “Efficient Estimation of Cointegrating Vectors and Testing for Causality in Vector Autoregressions.” Journal of Economic Surveys. 13, 41-76.

Dolado & Lütkepohl (1996). “Making Wald Tests Work for Cointegrating VAR Systems.” Econometric Reviews. 15, 369-386.

El-Agraa, A. M. (Ed.). (2001). The European Union.Economics and Policies, 6th ed., Pearson Education.

Garrett, G. (1992). “The European Community's Internal Market.” International Organization. 46, 533-560.

Garrett, G. (1995). “The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union.” International Organization. 49, 171-181.

Garrett, G. R. & Weingast, B. R. (1993). Ideas, Interests and Institutions: Constructing the European Community's Internal Market. In Goldstein, Judith and Robert, O. Keohane (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy, Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell University Press, pp. 173-206.

Giles, J. A. & Mirza, S. (1999). “Some Pretesting Issues on Testing for Granger Causality.” Econometrics Working Paper EWP9914, University of Victoria, Canada.

Granger, C. W. J. (1969). “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross Spectral Methods.” Econometrica. 37, 424-438.

Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Causal Inference.The New Palgrave: Econometrics, W. W. Norton, New-York.

Mattli, W. & Slaughter, A.-M. (1995). “Law and Politics in the European Union: A Reply to Garrett.” International Organization. 49, 183-190.

Mattli, W. & Slaughter, A.-M. (1998). “Revisiting the European Court of Justice. International Organization. 52, 177-209.

Moravcsik, A. (1991). “Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community.” International Organization. 45, 651-688.

Moravcsik, A. (1993). “Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalism Approach.” Journal of Common Market Studies. 31, 473-524.

Moravcsik, A. (1995). “Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Integration: A Rejoinder.” Journal of Common Market Studies. 33, 611-628.

Pollack, M. A. (1997). “Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community.” International Organization. 51, 99-134.

Rodrik, D. (2000). Institutions for High-Quality Growth: What are They and How to Acquire Them? Studies in Comparative International Development, Fall 2000.

Rodrik, D. (2001). Institutions, Integration and Geography: In Search of the Deep Determinants of Economic Growth, Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government.

Scully, G. W. (1988). “The Institutional Framework and Economic Development.” Journal of Political Economy. 96, 652-662.

Stone Sweet, A. & Sandholtz, W. (1997). “European Integration and Supranational Governance.” Journal of European Public Policy.4,297-317.

Stone Sweet, A. & Brunell, T. L. (1998). “Constructing a Supranational Constitution: Dispute Resolution and Governance in the European Community.” American Political Science Review. 92, 63-81.

Tanzi, V. & Schuknecht, L. (2000). Public Spending in the 20th Century.A Global Perspective, Cambridge University Press.

Toda, H. Y. & Yamamoto, T. (1995). “Statistical Inference in Vector Autoregressions with Possibly Integrated Process.” Journal of Econometrics. 66, 225-250.

Toda, H. Y. & Phillips, P. C. B. (1993). “Vector Autoregressions and Causality.” Econometrica. 61, 1367-1393.

Tridimas, G. & Tridimas, T. (2003). National Courts and the European Court of Justice: A Public Choice Analysis of the Preliminary Reference Procedure, forthcoming International Review of Law and Economics (in press).

Tridimas, T. (1999). The General Principles of EC Law, Oxford University Press.

Tsebelis, G. & Garrett, G. (2001). “The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the European Union.” International Organization. 55, 357-390.

Turner, C. & Munoz, R. (1999/2000). “Revising the Judicial Architecture of the European Union.” Yearbook of European Law. 19, 1-93.

Weiler, J. H. H. (1991). “The Transformation of Europe.” The Yale Law Journal. 100, 2403-2483.

Weiler, J. H. H. (1994). “A Quiet Revolution. The European Court of Justice and its interlocutors.” Comparative Political Studies.4,510-534.

Weiler, J. H. H. (1999). The Constitution of Europe, Cambridge University Press.