Jacques Loeb, B. F. Skinner, and the Legacy of Prediction and Control
Tóm tắt
The biologist Jacques Loeb is an important figure in the history of behavior analysis. Between 1890 and 1915, Loeb championed an approach to experimental biology that would later exert substantial influence on the work of B. F. Skinner and behavior analysis. This paper examines some of these sources of influence, with a particular emphasis on Loeb’s firm commitment to prediction and control as fundamental goals of an experimental life science, and how these goals were extended and broadened by Skinner. Both Loeb and Skinner adopted a pragmatic approach to science that put practical control of their subject matter above formal theory testing, both based their research programs on analyses of reproducible units involving the intact organism, and both strongly endorsed technological applications of basic laboratory science. For Loeb, but especially for Skinner, control came to mean something more than mere experimental or technological control for its own sake; it became synonomous with scientific understanding. This view follows from (a) the successful working model of science Loeb and Skinner inherited from Ernst Mach, in which science is viewed as human social activity, and effective practical action is taken as the basis of scientific knowledge, and (b) Skinner’s analysis of scientific activity, situated in the world of direct experience and related to practices arranged by scientific verbal communities. From this perspective, prediction and control are human acts that arise from and are maintained by social circumstances in which such acts meet with effective consequences.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Barnes, T. C., & Skinner, B. F. (1930). The progressive increase in the geotropic response of the ant Aphaenogaster. Journal of General Psychology, 4, 102–112.
Chiesa, M. (1992). Radical behaviorism and scientific frameworks: From mechanistic to relational accounts. American Psychologist, 47, 1287–1299.
Coleman, S. R. (1984). Background and change in B. F. Skinner’s metatheory from 1930 to 1938. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 5, 471–500.
Day, W. F., Jr. (1980). The historical antecedents of contemporary behaviorism. In R. W. Rieber & K. Salzinger (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical-historical perspectives (pp. 203–262). New York: Academic Press.
Fleming, D. (1964). Introduction. In J. Loeb, The mechanistic conception of life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goudge, T. A. (1967). Jacques Loeb. The encyclopedia of philosophy. New York: Macmillan.
Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hayes, S. C. (1978). Theory and technology in behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 1, 25–33.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1972). Nature as nurture: Behaviorism and the instinct doctrine. Behaviorism, 1, 23–52.
Hineline, P. N. (1992). A self-interpretive behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1274–1286.
Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Kazdin, A. E. (1978). History of behavior modification. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Loeb, J. (1900). Comparative physiology of the brain and comparative psychology. New York: Putnam.
Loeb, J. (1905). Studies in general physiology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1890)
Loeb, J. (1907). Concerning the theory of tropisms. The Journal of Experimental Zoology, 4, 145–156.
Loeb, J. (1912). The mechanistic conception of life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Loeb, J. (1916). The organism as a whole. New York: Putnam.
Logue, A. W. (1988). The behaviorist’s biologist: A review of Philip J. Pauly’s Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 205–207.
MacCorquodale, K. (1970). On Chomsky’s review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 83–99.
Malagodi, E. F. (1986). On radicalizing behaviorism: A call for cultural analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 1–17.
Marr, M. J. (1985). ’Tis the gift to be simple: A retrospective appreciation of Mach’s The Science of Mechanics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 129–138.
Midgley, B. D., & Morris, E. K. (1992). Nature = f(nurture): A review of Oyama’s The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 229–240.
Morris, E. K. (1991). Deconstructing technological to a fault. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 411–416.
Morris, E. K. (1992). The aim, progress, and evolution of behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 15, 3–29.
Moxley, R. A. (1992). From mechanistic to functional behaviorism. American Psychologist, 47, 1300–1311.
Oyama, S. (1985). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Palmer, D. E. (1929). Jacques Loeb: A contribution to the history of psychology. Journal of General Psychology, 2, 97–114.
Palmer, D. C., & Donahoe, J. W. (1992). Essentialism and selectionism in cognitive science and behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1344–1358.
Pauly, P. J. (1987). Controlling life: Jacques Loeb and the engineering ideal in biology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Provine, R. R. (1988). A hierarchy of developmental contingencies: A review of Purves and Lichtman’s Principles of Neural Development. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 565–569.
Purves, D., & Lichtman, J. W. (1985). Principles of neural development. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
Schwartz, B., Schuldenfrei, R., & Lacey, H. (1978). Operant psychology as factory psychology. Behaviorism, 6, 229–254.
Skinner, B. F. (1931). The concept of the reflex in the description of behavior. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 427–458.
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277, 291–294.
Skinner, B. F. (1947). Experimental psychology. In W. Dennis (Ed.), Current trends in psychology (pp. 16–49). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1956). A case history in the scientific method. American Psychologist, 11, 221–233.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1979). The shaping of a behaviorist. New York: Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1983). A matter of consequences. New York: Knopf.
Smith, L. D. (1992). On prediction and control: B. F. Skinner and the technological ideal of science. American Psychologist, 47, 216–223.
Thompson, T. (1984). The examining magistrate for nature: A retrospective review of Claude Bernard’s An Introduction to Experimental Medicine. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 211–216.