It’s not the size, it’s the relationship: from ‘small states’ to asymmetry

Alesina, A., and E. Spolaore. 2003. The size of nations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Allison, G.T. 1971. Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little and Brown.

Archer, C., A.J. Bailes, and A. Wivel (eds.). 2014. Small states and international security: Europe and beyond. New York: Routledge.

Aspinwall, M., and S. Reich. 2016. Who is Wile E. Coyote? Power, influence and the war on drugs. International Politics 53 (2): 155–175.

Ayoob, M. 2003. Inequality and theorizing in international relations: The case for subaltern realism. International Studies Review 4 (3): 27–48.

Baldacchino, G. 2009. Thucydides or Kissinger? A critical review of smaller state diplomacy. In The diplomacies of small states: Between vulnerability and resilience, ed. A.F. Cooper, and T.M. Shaw, 21–40. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Baldwin, D.A. 1980. Interdependence and power: A conceptual analysis. International Organization 34 (4): 471–506.

Barnett, M., and R. Duvall. 2005. Power in international politics. International Organization 59 (1): 39–75.

Benwell, R. 2011. The canaries in the coalmine: Small states as climate change champions. The Round Table 100 (413): 199–211.

Bitar, S.E. 2015. US military bases, quasi-bases, and domestic politics in Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Björkdahl, A. 2008. Norm advocacy: A small state strategy to influence the EU. Journal of European Public Policy 15 (1): 135–154.

Braveboy-Wagner, J.A. 2010. Opportunities and limitations of the exercise of foreign policy power by a very small state: The case of Trinidad and Tobago. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 23 (3): 407–427.

Braveboy-Wagner, J.A., and M.T. Snarr. 2003. Assessing current conceptual and empirical approaches. In The foreign policies of the global south: Rethinking conceptual frameworks, ed. J.A. Braveboy-Wagner, 13–30. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

Briguglio, I., G. Cordina, and E.J. Kisanga. 2008. Building the economic resilience of small states. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

Browning, C.S. 2006. Small, smart and salient? Rethinking identity in the small states literature. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 19 (4): 669–684.

Burges, S.W. 2009. Brazilian foreign policy after the cold war. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

Butt, A.I. 2013. Anarchy and hierarchy in international relations: Examining South America’s War-Prone Decade, 1932–41. International Organization 67 (3): 575–607.

Cason, J.W., and T.J. Power. 2009. Presidentialization, pluralization, and the rollback of Itamaraty: Explaining change in Brazilian foreign policy making in the Cardoso-Lula era. International Political Science Review 30 (2): 117–140.

Chong, A. 2010. Small state soft power strategies: Virtual enlargement in the cases of the Vatican City State and Singapore. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 23 (2): 383–405.

Chong, A., and M. Maass. 2010. Introduction: The foreign policy power of small states. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 23 (2): 381–382.

Clark, I. 2009. How hierarchical can international society be? International Relations 23 (3): 464–480.

Clark, P.C. 1992. The United States and Somoza, 1933–1956: A revisionist look. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Commonwealth Secretariat. 1985. Vulnerability: Small states in the global society. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

Cooley, A. 2014. Great games, local rules: The new great power contest in Central Asia. New York: Oxford University Press.

Cooley, A., and D.H. Nexon. 2013. “The empire will compensate you”: The structural dynamics of the US overseas basing network. Perspectives on Politics 11 (4): 1034–1050.

Cooper, A., and T. Shaw. 2009. The diplomacies of small states: Between vulnerability and resilience. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Crandall, M. 2014. Soft security threats and small states: The case of Estonia. Defence Studies 14 (1): 30–55.

Dahl, R.A. 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science 2 (3): 201–215.

Darnton, C. 2012. Asymmetry and agenda-setting in US-Latin American relations: Rethinking the origins of the Alliance for Progress. Journal of Cold War Studies 14 (4): 55–92.

Deitelhoff, N., and L. Wallbott. 2012. Beyond soft balancing: Small states and coalition-building in the ICC and climate negotiations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 25 (3): 345–366.

Desch, M.C. 1993. When the third world matters: Latin America and United States grand strategy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Donnelly, J. 2006. Sovereign inequalities and hierarchy in anarchy: American power and international society. European Journal of International Relations 12 (2): 139–170.

Easterly, W., and A. Kraay. 2000. Small states, small problems? Income, growth, and volatility in small states. World Development 28 (11): 2013–2027.

El-Anis, I. 2016. Explaining the behaviour of small states: An analysis of Jordan’s nuclear energy policy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29 (2): 528–547.

Escudé, C. 1997. Foreign policy theory in Menem’s Argentina. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.

Flemes, D., and S.E. Lobell. 2015. Contested leadership in international relations. International Politics 52 (2): 139–145.

Flemes, D., and L. Wehner. 2015. Drivers of strategic contestation: The case of South America. International Politics 52 (2): 163–177.

Fox, A.B. 1959. The power of small states: Diplomacy in World War II. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Friedman, M.P., and T. Long. 2015. Soft balancing in the Americas: Latin American opposition to U.S. intervention, 1898–1936. International Security 40 (1): 120–156.

Giacalone, R. 2012. Latin American foreign policy analysis: External influences and internal circumstances. Foreign Policy Analysis 8 (4): 335–354.

Gleijeses, P. 1991. Shattered hope: The Guatemalan revolution and the United States, 1944–1954. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Goetschel, L.S.F. 1998. Small states inside and outside the European Union: Interests and policies. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Grøn, C.H., and A. Wivel. 2011. Maximizing influence in the European Union after the Lisbon Treaty: From small state policy to smart state strategy. Journal of European Integration 33 (5): 523–539.

Hamilton, D.S. 2008. The Baltics: Still punching above their weight. Current History 107 (707): 119.

Handel, M.I. 1981. Weak states in the international system. London: Frank Cass.

He, J. 2016. Normative power in the EU and ASEAN: Why they diverge. International Studies Review 18 (1): 92–105.

Hey, J.A.K. 1997. Three building blocks of a theory of Latin American foreign policy. Third World Quarterly 18 (4): 631–657.

Hey, J.A.K. 2003a. Introducing small state foreign policy. In Small states in world politics: Explaining foreign policy behavior, ed. J.A.K. Hey. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

Hey, J.A.K. 2003b. Luxembourg: Where small works (and wealthy doesn’t hurt). In Small states in world politics: Explaining foreign policy behavior, ed. J.A.K. Hey, 75–94. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

Hey, J.A.K. 2003c. Small states in world politics: Explaining foreign policy behavior. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

Ingebritsen, C. 2002. Norm entrepreneurs: Scandinavia’s role in world politics. Cooperation and Conflict 37 (1): 11–23.

Ingebritsen, C. 2006. Scandinavia in world politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Jaschik, K. 2014. Small states and international politics: Climate change, the Maldives and Tuvalu. International Politics 51 (2): 272–293.

Jourde, C. 2007. The international relations of small neoauthoritarian states: Islamism, warlordism, and the framing of stability. International Studies Quarterly 51 (2): 481–503.

Kamrava, M. 2013. Qatar: Small state, big politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Kassimeris, C. 2009. The foreign policy of small powers. International Politics 46 (1): 84–101.

Katzenstein, P. 1985. Small states in world markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Keohane, R.O. 1969. Lilliputians’ Dilemmas: Small states in international politics. International Organization 23 (2): 291–310.

Keohane, R.O. 1971. The big influence of small allies. Foreign Policy 2: 161–182.

Keohane, R.O., and J.S. Nye. 1977. Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

Kingdon, J.W. 1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

Kinsella, D., and B. Russett. 2002. Conflict emergence and escalation in interactive international dyads. The Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1045–1068.

Lake, D.A. 1996. Anarchy, hierarchy, and the variety of international relations. International Organization 50: 1–34.

Lake, D.A. 2009. Hierarchy in international relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Lobell, S.E., N.G. Jesse, and K.P. Williams. 2015. Why do secondary states choose to support, follow or challenge? International Politics 52 (2): 146–162.

Long, T. 2015. Latin America confronts the United States: Asymmetry and influence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Long, T. 2016. Small states, great power? Gaining influence through intrinsic, derivative, and collective power. International Studies Review. doi: 10.1093/isr/viw040 .

Longley, K. 1997. The Sparrow and the Hawk: Costa Rica and the United States during the rise of José Figueres. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.

Maass, M. 2009. The elusive definition of the small state. International Politics 46 (1): 65–83.

Maass, M. 2014. Small states: Survival and proliferation. International Politics 51 (6): 709–728.

Maoz, Z. 1989. Power, capabilities, and paradoxical conflict outcomes. World Politics 41 (2): 239–266.

Mares, D.R. 1988. Middle powers under regional hegemony: To challenge or acquiesce in hegemonic enforcement. International Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 453–471.

Mearsheimer, J.J., and S.M. Walt. 2007. The Israel lobby and U.S. foreign policy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Mora, F.O., and J.A.K. Hey. 2003. Latin American and Caribbean foreign policy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Morrow, J.D. 1991. Alliances and asymmetry: An alternative to the capability aggregation model of alliances. American Journal of Political Science 35 (4): 904–933.

Nasra, S. 2011. Governance in EU foreign policy: Exploring small state influence. Journal of European Public Policy 18 (2): 164–180.

Neumann, I., and S. Gstöhl. 2006. Lilliputians in Gulliver’s world? In Small states in international relations, ed. C. Ingebritsen, I. Neumann, S. Gstöhl, et al., 3–36. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.

Ólafsson, B.G. 1998. Small states in the global system: Analysis and illustrations from the case of Iceland. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.

Panke, D. 2010. Small states in the European Union: Coping with structural disadvantages. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.

Panke, D. 2011. Small states in EU negotiations political dwarfs or power-brokers? Cooperation and Conflict 46 (2): 123–143.

Reeves, J. 2014. Rethinking weak state behavior: Mongolia’s foreign policy toward China. International Politics 51 (2): 254–271.

Rickli, J.-M. 2008. European small states’ military policies after the Cold War: From territorial to niche strategies. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 21 (3): 307–325.

Risse-Kappen, T. 1995. Cooperation among democracies: The European influence on U.S. foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Rothstein, R. 1968. Alliances and small powers. New York: Columbia University Press.

Rubin, L., and J. Jordan. 2015. Small states, strong ties? Qatar and its geopolitical environment. In International studies association 2015. New Orleans: La.

Russell, R., and J.G. Tokatlian. 2003. From antagonistic autonomy to relational autonomy: A theoretical reflection from the Southern Cone. Latin American Politics and Society 45 (1): 1–24.

Russell, R., and J.G. Tokatlian. 2009. Modelos de política exterior y opciones estratégicas: El caso de América Latina frente a Estados Unidos. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals 85–86: 211–249.

Selee, A.D., and A. Díaz-Cayeros. 2013. The dynamics of US–Mexican relations. In Mexico & the United States: The politics of partnership, ed. P.H. Smith, and A.D. Selee, 37–60. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

Shin, G.-W., H. Izatt, and R.J. Moon. 2016. Asymmetry of power and attention in alliance politics: the US–Republic of Korea case. Australian Journal of International Affairs 70 (3): 235–255.

Shoemaker, C.C., and J.W. Spanier. 1984. Patron–client state relationships: Multilateral crises in the nuclear age. New York: Praeger.

Steinmetz, R., and A. Wivel (eds.). 2010. Small states in Europe: Challenges and opportunities. Farnham: Ashgate.

Strakes, J.E. 2013. Situating the ‘balanced foreign policy’: The role of system structure in azerbaijan’s multi-vector diplomacy. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 15 (1): 37–67.

Strange, S. 1987. The persistent myth of lost hegemony. International Organization 41 (4): 551–574.

Sullivan, P.L. 2007. War aims and war outcomes: Why powerful states lose limited wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (3): 496–524.

Thorhallsson, B. 2010. Small states in the European Union. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Thorhallsson, B., and A. Wivel. 2006. Small states in the European Union: What do we know and what would we like to know? Cambridge Review of International Affairs 19 (4): 651–668.

Trager, R.F. 2015. Diplomatic signaling among multiple states. The Journal of Politics 77 (3): 635–647.

Vigevani, T., and G. Cepaluni. 2007. A política externa de Lula da Silva: A estratégia da autonomia pela diversificação. Contexto Internacional 29 (2): 273–335.

Vital, D. 1967. The inequality of states: A study of the small power in international relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Whitaker, B.E. 2010. Soft balancing among weak states? Evidence from Africa. International Affairs 86 (5): 1109–1127.

Wivel, A. 2005. The security challenge of small EU member states: Interests, identity and the development of the EU as a security actor. Journal of Common Market Studies 43 (2): 393–412.

Wivel, A. 2010. From small state to smart state: Devising a strategy for influence in the European Union. In Small states in Europe: Challenges and opportunities, ed. R. Steinmetz, and A. Wivel, 15–30. Farnham, England: Ashgate.

Womack, B. 2001. How size matters: The United States, China and asymmetry. The Journal of Strategic Studies 24 (4): 123–150.

Womack, B. 2016. Asymmetry and international relationships. New York: Cambridge University Press.