Isolation and characterization of 29 and 19 microsatellite loci from two deep-sea luminous lanternsharks, Etmopterus spinax and Etmopterus molleri (Squaliformes, Etmopteridae)
Tóm tắt
Etmopterus spinax (Linnaeus, 1758) and Etmopterus molleri (Whitley, 1939) are two bioluminescent deep-sea sharks, usually caught in large numbers as bycatch by deep-water fisheries. Yet, no study has ever involved population status of these two species using genetic tools. In order to investigate population genetic structure, diversity and connectivity of these two lanternsharks, 29 and 19 microsatellite loci were isolated from E. spinax DNA library for E. spinax and E. molleri, respectively. These loci were tested on 32 E. spinax individuals from the North Sea and seven E. molleri from the East China Sea. The number of alleles per locus ranged from 2 to 13. The observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.031 to 0.839 for E. spinax and from 0.000 to 1.000 for E. molleri, while the expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.031 to 0.903 and from 0.143 to 0.821, respectively. Almost all loci (24 and 16, respectively) were at Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for both species and no linkage disequilibrium among loci was detected. These loci represent useful tools to better understand the population structure of these two species. Besides, they could also be suitable for other lanternsharks in general, as these latter remain largely understudied, specially in terms of understanding the basic science that will serve into their conservation.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Claes JM, Mallefet J (2009) In: Meyer-Rochow VB (ed) Bioluminescence in Focus – a Collection of Illuminating Essays. Research Signpost, Kerala, pp 51–65
Straube N, Iglésias SP, Sellos DY et al (2010) Molecular phylogeny and node time estimation of bioluminescent lantern sharks (Elasmobranchii: Etmopteridae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 56:905–917. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12874
Straube N, Kriwet J, Schliewen UK (2011) Cryptic diversity and species assignment of large lantern sharks of the Etmopterus spinax clade from the Southern Hemisphere (Squaliformes, Etmopteridae). Zool Scr 40:61–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2010.00455.x
Gubili C, Macleod K, Perry W et al (2016) Connectivity in the deep: phylogeography of the velvet belly lanternshark. Deep Sea Res Part Oceanogr Res Pap 115:233–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.07.002
Moen FE, Svensen E (2004) Marine fish and invertebrates of Northern Europe. AquaPress, Essex
Coelho R, Erzini K (2010) Depth distribution of the velvet belly, Etmopterus spinax. in relation to growth and reproductive cycle: the case study of a deep-water lantern shark with a wide-ranging critical habitat. Mar Biol Res 6:381–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000802644706
Weigmann S (2016) Annotated checklist of the living sharks, batoids and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes) of the world, with a focus on biogeographical diversity. J Fish Biol 88:837–1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12874
Coelho R, Erzini K (2008) Life history of a wide-ranging deepwater lantern shark in the north-east Atlantic, Etmopterus spinax (Chondrichthyes: Etmopteridae), with implications for conservation. J Fish Biol 73:1419–1443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02021.x
Coelho R, Rey J, de Sola LG et al (2010) Comparing Atlantic and Mediterranean populations of the velvet belly lanternshark, Etmopterus spinax, with comments on the efficiency of density-dependent compensatory mechanisms. Mar Biol Res 6:373–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000903300885
Coelho R, Alpizar-Jara R, Erzini K (2015) Demography of a deep-sea lantern shark (Etmopterus spinax) caught in trawl fisheries of the northeastern Atlantic: application of Leslie matrices with incorporated uncertainties. Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr 115:64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.01.012
Beier S, Thiel T, Münch T et al (2017) MISA-web: a web server for microsatellite prediction. Bioinformatics 33:2583–2585. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx198
Koressaar T, Remm M (2007) Enhancements and modifications of primer design program Primer3. Bioinformatics 23:1289–1291. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm091
Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T et al (2012) Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 40:e115. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks596
Meglécz E, Pech N, Gilles A et al (2014) QDD version 3.1: a user-friendly computer program for microsatellite selection and primer design revisited: experimental validation of variables determining genotyping success rate. Mol Ecol Resour 14:1302–1313. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12271
Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/72708
Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159
Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices version 2.9.3.2, updated from Goudet 1995
Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GenePop: population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenism. J Hered 86:248–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb04456.x
Rousset F (2008) Genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Royal Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 57:289–300
van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DP, Shipley P (2004) Micro-Checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x