Isolation: an Alternative to the “Acting White” Hypothesis in Explaining Black Under-Enrollment in Advanced Courses
Tóm tắt
In this paper we propose a model for understanding the under-enrollment of black students in advanced courses that demonstrates how group differences in educational investment decisions can arise even in the absence of any group-level differences in underlying incentives or behavioral propensities. In our model, students gain peer group acceptance by spending time with other peer group members. This can occur during both leisure time and class time, provided enough members of their relevant peer group also take the same academic courses. This produces a scenario in which taking advanced courses is a complement to peer group acceptance for some students (those who have enough peer group members taking advanced courses) and a tradeoff for other students (those who do not have enough peer group members in advanced courses). Structural and historical forces, such as racialized tracking, that contribute to an initial condition of fewer black students in advanced courses can create an environment where black students are more likely to be isolated from other members of their racial group, relative to white students. Our model is distinct from theories like the “acting white” hypothesis that assume a cultural or non-cognitive skill deficit on the part of black students. The results from this model arise not because black students respond to incentives differently, but because they face a different set of initial conditions, most likely as the result of institutional barriers.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aboud F, Mendelson M, Purdy K. Cross-race peer relations and friendship quality. Int J Behav Dev. 2003;27(2):165–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250244000164.
Andrews R, Swinton O. The persistent myths of ‘acting white’ and race neutral alternatives to affirmative action in admissions. Rev Black Polit Econ. 2014;41(3):357–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12114-014-9188-8.
Archbald D, Glutting J, Qian X. Getting into honors or not: an analysis of the relative influence of grades, test scores, and race on track placement in a comprehensive high school. Am Second Educ. 2009;37(2):65–81.
Austen-Smith D, Fryer RG. An economic analysis of ‘acting white’. Q J Econ. 2005;120(2):551–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/120.2.551.
Bisin A, Verdier T. The economics of cultural transmission and socialization. In: Benhabib J, Bisin A, Jackson M, editors. Handbook of social economics, Chapter 9. 2011;1:339–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53187-2.00009-7.
Card D, Rothstein J. Racial segregation and the black-white test score gap. J Public Econ. 2007;91(11):2158–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.03.006.
Clotfelter CT. After ‘brown’: the rise and retreat of school desegregation. Princeton University Press: Princeton; 2011.
Coleman JS. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol. 1988;94:S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943.
Conger D, Long MC, Iatarola P. Explaining race, poverty, and gender disparities in advanced course-taking. J Policy Anal Manag. 2009;28(4):555–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20455.
Cook PJ, Ludwig J. The burden of ‘acting white’: do black adolescents disparage academic achievement? In: Jencks C, Phillips M, editors. The Black-White Test Score Gap, vol. Chapter 10. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution; 1998. p. 375–400.
Darity W, Jolla A. Desegregated schools with segregated education. In: Hartman C, Squires G, editors. The Integration Debate: Competing Futures for American Cities, vol. Chapter 8. New York: Routledge; 2009. p. 99–117.
Fordham S, Ogbu JU. Black students’ school success: coping with the 'burden of acting white. Urban Rev. 1986;18(3):176–206.
Francis DV, de Oliveira ACM, Dimmitt C. Do school counselors exhibit bias in recommending students for advanced coursework? B E J Econ Anal Policy. 2019;19(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2018-0189.
Fryer RG, Levitt SD. Understanding the black-white test score gap in the first two years of school. Rev Econ Stat. 2004;86(2):447–64. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465304323031049.
Fryer RG, Torelli P. An empirical analysis of ‘acting white’. J Public Econ. 2010;94(5):380–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.10.011.
Gamoran A. Tracking and inequality: new directions for research and practice. In: Apple MW, Ball SJ, Gandin LA, editors. The Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Education, vol. Chapter 19. New York: Routledge; 2010. p. 213–28.
Gershenson S, Holt SB, Papageorge NW. Who believes in me? The effect of student-teacher demographic match on teacher expectations. Econ Educ Rev. 2016;52:209–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.03.002.
Gonzalez N. How learning about one’s ability affect educational investment: evidence from the advanced placement program. Working Paper 52. Math Policy Res. 2017.
Graham BS. Identifying social interactions through conditional variance restrictions. Econometrica. 2008;76(3):643–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00850.x.
Graham S, Taylor AZ, Ho AY. Race and ethnicity in peer relations research. In: Rubin KH, Bukowski WM, Laursen B, editors. Handbook of peer interactions, relationships and groups. New York: Guilford; 2009. p. 394–413.
Grogger J. Speech patterns and racial wage inequality. J Hum Resour. 2011;46(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.46.1.1.
Hale JE. Learning while black: creating educational excellence for African American children. Baltimore: JHU Press; 2001.
Harris A. I (don’t) hate school: revisiting oppositional culture theory of blacks’ resistance to schooling. Soc Forces. 2006;85(2):797–833. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2007.0006.
Hymel S, Rubin K, Rowden L, LeMare L. Children’s peer relationships: longitudinal prediction of internalizing and externalizing problems from middle to late childhood. Child Dev. 1990;61(6):2004–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb03582.x.
Johnson JD, Kaiser CR. Racial identity denied: are wealthy black victims of racism rejected by their own group? Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2013;4(3):376–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612456709.
Klopfenstein K. Advanced placement: do minorities have equal opportunity? Econ Educ Rev. 2004;23(2):115–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(03)00076-1.
Lewis AE, Diamond JB. Despite the best intentions: how racial inequality thrives in good schools: Oxford University Press; 2015.
Long MC, Conger D, Iatarola P. Effects of high school course-taking on secondary and post-secondary success. Am Educ Res J. 2012;49(2):285–322. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211431952.
Loury GC. Why does racial inequality persist? Culture, causation, and responsibility. Manhattan Institute Essay; 2019.
Noguera PA. The trouble with black boys:... And other reflections on race, equity, and the future of public education: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
Oakes J. Keeping track: how schools structure inequality. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2005.
Ogbu JU. Minority status, oppositional culture and schooling. New York: Routledge; 2008.
Rock PF, Cole DJ, Houshyar S, Lythcott M, Prinstein MJ. Peer status in an ethnic context: associations with African American adolescents’ ethnic identity. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2011;32(2011):163–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.03.002.
Scarr SA, Pakstis J, Katz SH, Barker WB. Absence of a relationship between degree of white ancestry and intellectual skills within a black population. Hum Genet. 1977;39(1):69–86.
Smith J, Hurwitz M, Avery C. Giving college credit where it is due: advanced placement exam scores and college outcomes. J Labor Econ. 2017;35(1):67–147. https://doi.org/10.1086/687568.
Tyson K. Integration interrupted: tracking, black students, and acting white after brown. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
Tyson KW, Darity WA, Castellino DR. It’s not ‘a black thing’: understanding the burden of acting white and other dilemmas of high achievement. Am Sociol Rev. 2005;70(4):582–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000403.
Vigdor J, Nechyba T. Peer effects in North Carolina public schools. Schools Equal Oppor Probl. 2007;73–101.
Yonezawa S, Wells AS, Serna I. Choosing tracks: “freedom of choice” in detracking schools. Am Educ Res J. 2002;39(1):37–67. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312039001037.