Is there something missing in scientific provenance studies of prehistoric artefacts?

Antiquity - Tập 88 Số 340 - Trang 625-631 - 2014
A. Mark Pollard1, Peter Bray1, Chris Gosden2
1Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK
2Institute of Archaeology, University of Oxford, 36 Beaumont Street, Oxford, OX1 2PG, UK

Tóm tắt

Determination of the provenance of material culture by means of chemical analysis has a long and distinguished history in archaeology. The chemical analysis of archaeological objects started in the intellectual ferment of late-eighteenth-century Europe (Caley 1948, 1949, 1967; Pollard 2013), almost as soon as systematic (gravimetric) means of chemical analysis had been devised (Pollard in prep.). Many of the leading scientists of the day, such as Vauquelin, Klaproth, Davy, Faraday and Berzelius, carried out analyses of archaeological objects as part of their interests in the contents of the ‘cabinets of curiosities’ of the day (Pollard&Heron 2008). The subject moved frommere curiosity to systematic and problemorientated study with the work of G¨obel (1842),Wocel (1854), Damour (1865) and Helm (1886), who essentially formulated the idea of ‘provenance studies’—that some chemical characteristic of the geological rawmaterial(s) provides a ‘fingerprint’ which can bemeasured in the finished object, and that if an object from a remote source is identified at a particular place, then it is evidence of some sort of direct or indirect contact and ‘trade’ between the two places.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Wilson, 2001, Handbook of archaeological sciences, 507

10.1017/S0003598X00047967

10.1017/S0003598X00091845

Wocel, 1854, Archäologische Parallelen. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen, Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-Historische Classe (Wien), 11, 716

Northover, 2001, Lead isotopes and metal circulation in Beaker/Early Bronze Age Ireland, Journal of Irish Archaeology, 10, 25

Helm, 1886, Tiryns, 369

Sahlins, 1985, Islands of history

O'Brien, 2004, Ross Island. Mining, metal and society in early Ireland

Pollard, 2008, Archaeological chemistry, 10.1039/9781847558299

Mckerrell, 1972, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 38, 209

Pollard, 2013, Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 32, 333

Rohl, 1998, The circulation of metal in the British Bronze Age: the application of lead isotope analysis

10.1021/ed026p242

Caley, 1948, On the application of chemistry to archaeology, Ohio Journal of Science, 48, 1

Pollard A.M. In preparation. Letters from China-a history of the early chemical analyses of archaeological ceramics.

10.1080/00438243.1999.9980439

10.1021/ed044p120

Munn, 1992, The fame of Gawa

10.1016/B978-0-12-241580-7.50007-3

10.1016/B978-0-12-241580-7.50015-2

Damour, 1865, Sur la composition des haches en pierre trouvées dans les monuments celtiques et chez les tribus sauvages, Comptes Rendues Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, 61, 357

Göbel, 1842, Ueber den Einfluss der Chemie auf die Ermittelung der Völker der Vorzeit oder Resultate der chemischen Untersuchung metallischer Alterthümer insbesondere der in den Ostseegouvernements vorkommenden, Behuss der Ermittelung der Völker, van welchen sie abstammen

Dobres, 2000, Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Antiquity

Tập 88 Số 340

625-631

Thông tin tác giả