Is there an impact of feet position on squatting birth position? An innovative biomechanical pilot study
Tóm tắt
The squatting birth position is widely used for “natural” birth or in countries where childbirth occurs in non-medical facilities. Squatting birth positions, like others, are roughly defined so a biomechanical assessment is required with the availability of noninvasive technology in pregnant women. In practice, we can observe spontaneously two kinds of squatting birth position: on tiptoes and with feet flat. To compare the impact of foot posture on biomechanical parameters considered essential in obstetrical biomechanics during a squatting birth position: on tiptoes versus with feet flat on the floor. Thirteen pregnant women beyond 32 weeks of gestational age who were not in labor were assessed during squatting birth position firstly spontaneously and secondly with the foot posture that was not taken spontaneously (on the tiptoes vs with feet flat). For each position, ANGle of flexion on the spine of the plane of the pelvis external conjugate (ANGec), hip flexion and abduction, and lumbar curve were assessed using an optoelectronic motion capture system and a biomechanical model adapted from the conventional gait model as well as a measuring system of the lumbar curve. Spontaneously, 11 out of 13 women squatted on tiptoe at the first test. On tiptoes the hip flexion was lower than with feet flat (p < 0.02), whereas hip abduction was not significantly different (p = 0.28). A lower ANGec angle (p = 0.003) was noticed for the tiptoe position than feet flat. The lumbar curve (lordosis) was more marked for the squatting position on tiptoes than for the position with feet flat (p < 0.001). On tiptoes no woman had a pelvic inlet plane perpendicular to the spine and none had a flat back or kyphosis. No woman on tiptoes fulfilled the two conditions necessary for the position that we consider optimal. In squatting birth position, foot posture has a biomechanical impact on lumbar curve and pelvic orientation. When comparing squatting positions (on tiptoes vs feet flat), feet flat on the ground is closer to optimal birth conditions than on tiptoes.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Engelmann GJ. Labor among primitive peoples. St Louis: J.H. Chambers & Co; 1883. p. 260.
da Silva FMB, de Oliveira SMJV, Bick D, Osava RH, Tuesta EF, Riesco MLG. Risk factors for birth-related perineal trauma: a cross-sectional study in a birth centre. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21:2209–18.
Lien Y-S, Chen G-D, Ng S-C. Prevalence of and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and lower urinary tract symptoms among women in rural Nepal. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119:185–8.
Atwood RJ. Parturitional posture and related birth behavior. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1976;57:1–25.
Desseauve D, Fradet L, Lacouture P, Pierre F. Position for labor and birth: state of knowledge and biomechanical perspectives. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;208:46–54.
Das De SBP, Bose K. Squatting posture in Asians and development of the inferior hip sourcil. J Orthop Surg. 1994;2:33–7.
Hemmerich A, Brown H, Smith S, Marthandam SSK, Wyss UP. Hip, knee, and ankle kinematics of high range of motion activities of daily living. J Orthop Res Off Publ Orthop Res Soc. 2006;24:770–81.
Klein M. Alternative birth positions. Can Fam Physician. 1988;34:2621–2.
Reid AJ, Harris NL. Alternative birth positions. Can Fam Physician. 1988;34:1993–8.
Gold EM. “Pelvic drive” in obstetrics: an x-ray study of 100 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1950;59:890–6.
Forrester SE. Selecting the number of trials in experimental biomechanics studies. Int Biomech. 2015;2:62–72.
Desseauve D, Pierre F, Gachon B, Decatoire A, Lacouture P, Fradet L. New approaches for assessing childbirth positions. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;46:189–95.
Sakakibara R, Tsunoyama K, Hosoi H, Takahashi O, Sugiyama M, Kishi M, et al. Influence of body position on defecation in humans. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2010;2:16–21.