Is the value of an environmental public good sensitive to the providing institution?

Resources and Energy Economics - Tập 34 - Trang 381-395 - 2012
Kyriaki Remoundou1, Yiannis Kountouris2, Phoebe Koundouri3
1School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Agriculture Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
2Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK
3Department of International and European Economic Studies, Athens University of Economics and Business, 76 Patission Street, Athens 10434, Greece

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adaman, 2011, What determines urban households’ willingness to pay for CO2 emission reductions in Turkey: a contingent valuation survey, Energy Policy, 39, 689, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.042 Adamowicz, 1998, Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80, 64, 10.2307/3180269 Bateman, 2002 Bergstrom, 2004, Trading taxes vs. paying taxes to value and finance public environmental goods, Environmental and Resource Economics, 28, 533, 10.1023/B:EARE.0000036779.58923.02 Bond, 2009, Joint estimation of discount rates and willingness to pay for public goods, Ecological Economics, 68, 2751, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.006 Campbell, 2008, Assessing the spatial dependence of welfare estimates obtained from discrete choice experiments, Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 1, 117, 10.1007/s12076-008-0012-6 Carlsson, 2003, Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics, Health Economics, 12, 281, 10.1002/hec.729 Cummings, 1998, Does realism matter in contingent valuation surveys?, Land Economics, 74, 203, 10.2307/3147051 Czajkowski, 2009, Using labels to investigate scope effects in stated preference methods, Environmental and Resource Economics, 44, 521, 10.1007/s10640-009-9299-z Diamond, 1994, Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number?, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 45, 10.1257/jep.8.4.45 Dietz, S., Atkinson, G., 2009. The equity–efficiency trade-off in environmental policy: evidence from stated preferences. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1338176. Forest Service of Parnitha. Available at: http://www.parnitha-np.gr/ (accessed January 2010). Groothuis, 1997, The role of social distrust in risk–benefit analysis: a study of the siting of a hazardous waste disposal facility, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 15, 241, 10.1023/A:1007757326382 Hensher, 2003, The mixed logit model: the state of practice, Transportation, 30, 133, 10.1023/A:1022558715350 Hensher, 2005 Johnston, 1999, Estimating willingness to pay and resource tradeoffs with different payment mechanisms: an evaluation of a funding guarantee for watershed management, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38, 97, 10.1006/jeem.1999.1077 Jacobsen, 2010, Preferences for site and environmental functions when selecting forthcoming national parks, Ecological Economics, 69, 1532, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.013 Jorgensen, 2000, Protest responses and willingness to pay: attitude toward paying for storm water pollution abatement, Ecological Economics, 33, 251, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00145-7 Kaval, 2007, Willingness-to-pay for prescribed fire in the Colorado (USA) wildland urban interface, Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 928, 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.08.003 Krinsky, 1986, On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities, Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, 715, 10.2307/1924536 Kontoleon, A., Yabe, M., Darby, L., 2005. Alternative payment vehicles in contingent valuation: the case of genetically modified foods. Presented in the EAERE Conference 2005. Available at: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1827/ (accessed January 2010). Loomis, 1998, A willingness-to-pay function for protecting acres of spotted owl habitat from fire, Ecological Economics, 25, 315, 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00044-X Loomis, 2004, Do nearby forest fires cause a reduction in residential property values?, Journal of Forest Economics, 10, 149, 10.1016/j.jfe.2004.08.001 Luisetti, 2011, Testing the fundamental assumption of choice experiments: are values absolute or relative?, Land Economics, 87, 284, 10.3368/le.87.2.284 Meyerhoff, 2009, Status-quo effect in choice experiments: empirical evidence on attitudes and choice task complexity, Land Economics, 85, 515, 10.3368/le.85.3.515 Meyerhoff, 2008, Do protest responses to a contingent valuation question and a choice experiment differ?, Environmental and Resource Economics, 39, 433, 10.1007/s10640-007-9134-3 Mitchell, 1989 Morrison, 2000, Minimising payment vehicle bias in contingent valuation studies, Environmental and Resource Economics, 16, 407, 10.1023/A:1008368611972 Nunes, 2009, Comparing tax and tax reallocation payments in financing rail noise abatement programmes: results from a stated choice valuation study in Italy, Environmental and Resource Economics, 43, 503, 10.1007/s10640-008-9243-7 Poe, 2005, Computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87, 353, 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00727.x Powe, 2004, Investigating insensitivity to scope: a split-sample test of perceived scheme realism, Land Economics, 80, 258, 10.2307/3654742 Randall, 1986, Human preferences, economics, and the preservation of species Riera, 2004, Evaluation of a risk reduction in forest fires in a Mediterranean region, Forest Policy and Economics, 6, 521, 10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00119-3 Riera, 2007, Valuation of climate-change effects on Mediterranean shrublands, Ecological Applications, 17, 91, 10.1890/1051-0761(2007)017[0091:VOCEOM]2.0.CO;2 Rolfe, 2002, Stated values and reminders of substitute goods: testing for framing effects with choice modelling, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 46, 1, 10.1111/1467-8489.00164 Samuelson, 1988, Status quo bias in decision making, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7, 10.1007/BF00055564 Scarpa, 2008, Utility in willingness to pay space: a tool to address confounding random scale effects in destination choice to the Alps, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90, 994, 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01155.x Scarpa, 2005, Performance of error component models for status-quo effects in choice experiments, 247 Schlapfer, 2006, Survey protocol and income effects in the contingent valuation of public goods: a meta-analysis, Ecological Economics, 57, 415, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.019 Swait, 1993, The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models, Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 305, 10.2307/3172883 Train, 2005, Discrete choice models in preference space and willingness-to-pay space, 1 Transparency International, 2010. 2009 global corruption parameters. Available online at: http://www.transparency.org/ (accessed on May 2010). Vaux, 1984 Whittington, 2002, Improving the performance of contingent valuation studies in developing countries, Environmental and Resource Economics, 22, 323, 10.1023/A:1015575517927 WWF Greece, 2007a. Ecological assessment of the wildfires of June 2007 in the Parnitha. Available at the official website of WWF Greece: http://politics.wwf.gr/images/stories//fireparnisreport2007_14.pdf (accessed November 2009, in Greek). WWF Greece, 2007b. Basic principles for the protection and management of the National Park of Parnitha after the wildfires. Available at the official website of WWF Greece: http://politics.wwf.gr/images/stories/political/dasikipolitiki/masterplanparnes.pdf (accessed November 2009, in Greek).