Is idiosyncratic risk ignored in asset pricing: Sri Lankan evidence?
Tóm tắt
The present study focused on one of the important South Asian nations—Sri Lanka—to examine the role of idiosyncratic volatility in asset prices. A four-factor model with idiosyncratic volatility was designed for capturing the market, size, value and idiosyncratic risk yields better than Fama and French’s (J Financ Econ 33:3–56, 1993) three-factor model and performance of the model. Fama–MacBeth’s cross-sectional regression, residual graphs and GRS test all confirm the superiority of four-factor model over 2 three-factor models. For all MC- and IVOL-based portfolios, idiosyncratic volatility is negatively related to the expected returns and positively related for all PB-based portfolios. Finally, study findings confirm that there is a high importance for idiosyncratic volatility risk factor while considering investment decision in Colombo stock exchange. Hence, investor should compensate for holding such risk factors in the portfolio.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Sharpe WF (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Finance 19:425–442
Lintner J (1965) The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Rev Econ Stat 47:13–37
Mossin J (1966) Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econom J Econom Soc 34(4):768–783
Merton RC (1987) A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. J Finance 42:483–510
Malkiel BG, Xu Y (2006) Idiosyncratic risk and security returns. Working paper, The University of Texas at Dallas. Available at: https://www.utdallas.edu/~yexiaoxu/IVOT_H.PDF. Accessed Feb 2019
Fu F (2009) Idiosyncratic risk and the cross-section of expected stock returns. J Financ Econ 91:24–37
Ang A, Hodrick RJ, Xing Y et al (2006) The cross section of volatility and expected returns. J Finance 61:259–299
Ang A, Hodrick RJ, Xing Y et al (2009) High idiosyncratic volatility and low returns: international and further US evidence. J Financ Econ 91:1–23
Guo H, Savickas R (2010) Relation between time-series and cross-sectional effects of idiosyncratic variance on stock returns. J Bank Finance 34:1637–1649
Frieder L, Jiang GJ (2008) Separating up from down: new evidence on the idiosyncratic volatility-return relation. American Finance Association Meetings, New Orleans. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=970875. Accessed Feb 2019
Chua CT, Goh J, Zhang Z (2006) Idiosyncratic volatility matters for the cross-section of returns-in more ways than one. Unpublished working paper, Singapore Management University
Wagner N, Winter E (2013) A new family of equity style indices and mutual fund performance: do liquidity and idiosyncratic risk matter? J Empir Finance 21:69–85
Blackrock (2011) Are emerging markets the next developed markets? BlackRock Investement Institute report. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e40d/03f424ed1338f71228ea1c8a167035616993.pdf. Accessed Feb 2019
Fama E, French K (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J Financ Econ 33:3–56
Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Polit Econ 81(3):637–654
Banz RW (1981) The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. J Financ Econ 9(1):3–18
Reinganum MR (1981) Misspecification of capital asset pricing: empirical anomalies based on earnings’ yields and market values. J Financ Econ 9(1):19–46
Gibbons MR (1982) Multivariate tests of financial models: a new approach. J Financ Econom 10(1):3–27
Basu S (1983) The relationship between earnings yield, market value, and return for NYSE common stocks: further evidence. J Financ Econ 12:129–156
Bhandari LC (1988) Debt/equity ratio and expected common stock returns: empirical evidence. J Finance 43(2):507–528
Balakrishnan A, Maiti M (2017) Dynamics of size and value factors in stock returns: evidence from India. Indian J Finance 11:21–35. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2017/v11i6/115593
Balakrishnan A, Maiti M, Panda P (2018) Test of five-factor asset pricing model in India. Vision 22(2):153–162
Maiti M (2019) Can leverage effect coexist with value effect? IIMB Manag Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.07.011
Maiti M (2019) OLS versus quantile regression in extreme distributions. Contaduría y administración 64(2):12
Maiti M (2018) A six factor asset pricing model. http://hdl.handle.net/10603/257097. Accessed Oct 2019
Campbell JY, Lettau M, Malkiel BG et al (2001) Have individual stocks become more volatile? An empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk. J Finance 56:1–43
Jiang X, Lee BS (2006) The dynamic relation between returns and idiosyncratic volatility. Financ Manag 35(2):43–65
Drew ME, Marsden A, Veeraraghavan M (2007) Does idiosyncratic volatility matter? New Zealand evidence. Rev Pac Basin Financ Markets Policies 10(03):289–308
Huang W, Liu Q, Rhee SG, Zhang L (2009) Return reversals, idiosyncratic risk, and expected returns. Rev Financ Stud 23(1):147–168
Peterson D, Smedeman AR (2011) The return impact of realized and expected idiosyncratic volatility. J Bank Finance 35:2547–2558
Liu B, Di Iorio A (2016) The pricing of idiosyncratic volatility: an Australian study. Aust J Manag 41(2):353–375
Gibbons MR, Ross SA, Shanken J (1989) A test of the efficiency of a given portfolio. Econom J Econom Soc 57(5):1121–1152