Is Prebiopsy MRI Good Enough to Avoid Prostate Biopsy? A Cohort Study Over a 1-Year Period

Chun, 2006, Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology, Eur Urol, 49, 820, 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.007

Scattoni, 2010, Biopsy schemes with the fewest cores for detecting 95% of the prostate cancers detected by a 24-core biopsy, Eur Urol, 57, 1, 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.08.011

Schoots, 2014, Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur Urol

Tamada, 2008, Prostate cancer: relationships between postbiopsy hemorrhage and tumor detectability at MR diagnosis, Radiology, 248, 531, 10.1148/radiol.2482070157

Kirkham, 2013, Prostate MRI: who, when, and how? Report from a UK consensus meeting, Clin Radiol, 68, 1016, 10.1016/j.crad.2013.03.030

Pepe, 2007, Saturation prostate needle biopsy and prostate cancer detection at initial and repeat evaluation, Urology, 70, 1131, 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.068

Jones, 2007, Saturation biopsy for detecting and characterizing prostate cancer, BJU Int, 99, 1340, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06868.x

Noguchi, 2001, Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer, J Urol, 166, 104

King, 2004, Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 59, 386, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.014

Onik, 2009, Three-dimensional prostate mapping biopsy has a potentially significant impact on prostate cancer management, J Clin Oncol, 27, 4321, 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.3497

Rouse, 2011, Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging to rule-in and rule-out clinically important prostate cancer in men at risk: a cohort study, Urol Int, 87, 49, 10.1159/000325880

Arumainayagam, 2013, Multiparametric MR imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a validation cohort study with transperineal template prostate mapping as the reference standard, Radiology, 268, 761, 10.1148/radiol.13120641

Rais-Bahrami, 2013, Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer, J Urol, 190, 1721

Abd-Alazeez, 2014, Performance of multiparametric MRI in men at risk of prostate cancer before the first biopsy: a paired validating cohort study using template prostate mapping biopsies as the reference standard, Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 17, 40, 10.1038/pcan.2013.43

Thompson, 2014, Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study, J Urol, 192, 67

Bill-Axelson, 2014, Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer, N Engl J Med, 370, 932, 10.1056/NEJMoa1311593

Panebianco, 2015, Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging vs. standard care in men being evaluated for prostate cancer: a randomized study, Urol Oncol, 33, 17.e1, 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.09.013

Portalez, 2012, Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients, Eur Urol, 62, 986, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.044

Balleyguier, 2007, BIRADS classification in mammography, Eur J Radiol, 61, 192, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.08.033