Is Artificial Intelligence in Education an Object or a Subject? Evidence from a Story Completion Exercise on Learner-AI Interactions

TechTrends - 2024
George Veletsianos1, Shandell Houlden2, Nicole Johnson3
1Learning Technologies, College of Education and Human Development, Minneapolis, USA
2School of Education and Technology, Royal Roads University, Victoria, Canada
3Canadian Digital Learning Research Association, Mississauga, Canada

Tóm tắt

Much of the literature on artificial intelligence (AI) in education imagines AI as a tool in the service of teaching and learning. Is such a one-way relationship all that exists between AI and learners? In this paper we report on a thematic analysis of 92 participant responses to a story completion exercise which asked them to describe a classroom agreement between an AI instructor and a learner twenty years into the future. Using a relational theoretical framework, we find that the classroom agreements between AI and learners that participants produced encompassed elements of education, boundaries, affordances, and social conventions. These findings suggest that the ways learners relate to AI vary. Some learners relate to AI as an object, others relate to AI as a subject, and some relate to AI both as an object and a subject. These results invite a deeper engagement with the ways in which learners might relate to AI and the kinds of ethics and social protocols that such relations suggest.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adam, T. (2019). Digital neocolonialism and massive open online courses (MOOCs): Colonial pasts and neoliberal futures. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(3), 365–380. Antonenko, P., & Abramowitz, B. (2022). In-service teachers’ (mis)conceptions of artificial intelligence in K-12 science education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(1), 64–78. Asimov, I. (1950). I, robot. Gnome Press. Bearman, M., Ryan, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2022). Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: a critical literature review. Higher Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2 Belga News Agency. (2023). ‘We will live as one in heaven’: Belgian man dies by suicide after chatbot exchanges. Belga News Agency. https://www.belganewsagency.eu/we-will-live-as-one-in-heaven-belgian-man-dies-of-suicide-following-chatbot-exchanges Bewersdorff, A., Zhai, X., Roberts, J., & Nerdel, C. (2023). Myths, mis- and preconceptions of artificial intelligence: A review of the literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100143. Birhane, A. (2021). Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach. Patterns, 2(2), 100205. Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., Farrow, R., Bond, M., Nerantzi, C., Honeychurch, S., Bali, M., Dron, J., Mir, K., Stewart, B., Costello, E., Mason, J., Stracke, C. M., Romero-Hall, E., Koutropoulos, A., . . . Jandrić, P. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 53–130. http://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/709/394 Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE Publications Ltd. Chiu, T. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118. Clarke, V., Braun V., & Wooles, K. (2015). Thou shalt not covet another man? Exploring constructions of same-sex and different-sex infidelity using story completion. Journal of Community Applied Social Psychology, 25, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2204 Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Moller, N., & Tischner, I. (2017). Once upon a time…: story completion methods. In V. Braun, V. Clarke, & D. Gray (Eds.), Collecting qualitative data: A practical guide to textual, media and virtual techniques (pp. 45–70). Cambridge University Press. Clarke, V., Braun, V., Frith, H., & Moller, N. (2019). Editorial introduction to the special issue: Using story completion methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1536378 Costello, E. (2023). ChatGPT and the AI educational chatter: Full of bullshit or trying to tell us something? Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00398-5 Cox, A. M. (2021). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence and robots on higher education through literature-based design fictions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00237-8 Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8 Dignum, V. (2022). Relational artificial intelligence. ArXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.07446v1. Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything: Design, fiction, and social dreaming. The MIT Press. Frith, H. (2013). Accounting for orgasmic absence: Exploring heterosex using the story completion method. Psychology and Sexuality, 4(3), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2012.760172 Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967a). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Transaction Publishers. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967b). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine Publishing Company. Harris, T. (Host). & Raskin, A. (Host.) (2023). Spotlight: AI myths and misconceptions. Your Undivided Attention Podcast. [Podcast transcript] Center for Humane Technology. https://assets-global.website-files.com/5f0e1294f002b1bb26e1f304/64654ef391e7819cf198807e_spotlight-your-undivided-attention-AI-myths-and-misconceptions-transcript.docx%20(1).pdf Heath, M. K., Gleason, B., Mehta, R., & Hall, T. (2023). More than knowing: Toward collective, critical, and ecological approaches in educational technology research. Education Technology Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10242-z Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533 Hrastinski, S., & Jandrić, P. (2023). Imagining education futures: Researchers as fiction authors. Postdigital Science & Education. Online First. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00403-x Houlden, S., & Veletsianos, G. (2023). Impossible dreaming: on speculative education fiction and hopeful learning futures. Postdigital Science & Education, 5, 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00348-7 Humble, N., & Mozelius, P. (2022). The threat, hype, and promise of artificial intelligence in education. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00039-z Khan, I., Ahmad, A. R., Jabeur, N., & Mahdi, N. M. (2021). An artificial intelligence approach to monitor student performance and devise preventive measures. Smart Learning Environments, 8(17), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00161-y Kitzinger, C., & Powell, D. (1995). Engendering infidelity: Essentialist and social constructionist readings of a story completion task. Feminism and Psychology, 5(3), 345–372. Kitzinger, C., & Wood, M. (2019). Story completion, methodological innovation, epistemology and social change: Matthew Wood in conversation with Celia Kitzinger. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(1), 21–33. Lange, E.A. (2023). Transformative sustainability education: Reimagining our future. Routledge. Lewis, J. E. (2021). From impoverished intelligence to abundant intelligences. https://jasonedwardlewis.medium.com/from-impoverished-intelligence-to-abundant-intelligences-90559f718e7f. Accessed 18 Dec 2023. Markham, A. (2021). Challenges to intervening in future speculations of memory, data, and algorithms. New Media & Society, 23(2), 382–405. Mugumbate, J., & Nyanguru, A. (2013). Exploring african philosophy: The value of Ubuntu in social work. African Journal of Social Work, 3(1), 100. Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., et al. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific. ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. Pelletier, K., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Robert, J., Arbino, N., Al-Freih, M., Dickson-Deane, C., Guevara, C., Koster, L., Sánchez-Mendiola, M., Skallerup Bessette, L., & Stine, J. (2022). 2022 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Teaching and Learning Edition. EDUCAUSE. Peters, M. A., Jackson, L., Papastephanou, M., Jandrić, P., Lazaroiu, G., Evers, C. W., Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., Araya, D., Tesar, M., Mika, C., Chen, L., Wang, C., Sturm, S., Rider, S., & Fuller, S. (2023). AI and the future of humanity: ChatGPT-4, philosophy and education – Critical responses. Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2023.2213437 Pinkwart, N. (2016). Another 25 years of AIEd? Challenges and opportunities for intelligent educational Technologies of the Future. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0099-7 Ross, J. (2017). Speculative method in digital education research. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1160927 Ross, J. (2022). Digital futures for learning: Speculative methods and pedagogies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003202134 Sacharidis, D., Mukamakuza, C. P., & Werthner, H. (2020). Fairness and diversity in social-based recommender systems. In Adjunct Publication of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (pp. 83–88). https://doi.org/10.1145/3386392.3397603 Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality and Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8 Selwyn, N. (2022). The future of AI and education. Some cautionary notes. European Journal of Education: Research, Development and Policy, 57(4), 620–631. Selwyn, N., Pangrazio, L., Nemorin, S., & Perrotta, C. (2020). What might the school of 2030 be like? An exercise in social science fiction. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1694944 Topa (Four Arrows), W. & Narvaez, D. (2022). Restoring the kinship worldview: Indigenous voices introduce 28 precepts for rebalancing life on planet Earth. North Atlantic Books. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books. UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376709. Accessed 18 Dec 2023. Veletsianos, G., & Houlden, S. (2020). Radical flexibility and relationality as responses to education in times of crisis. Postdigital Science & Education, 2, 849–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00196-3 Veletsianos, G., & Houlden, S. (2024). Youth perspectives on three speculative futures for higher education. Manuscipt under review. Veletsianos, G., & Russell, G. (2014). Pedagogical agents. In M. Spector, D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 759–769). Springer Academic. Veletsianos, G., Houlden, S., Hodson, J., Thompson, & C., Reid, D. (2022). An evaluation of a microlearning intervention to limit COVID-19 online misinformation. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 6, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/2Fs41686-022-00067-z Veletsianos, G., Johnson, N., & Houlden, S. (2024). How do Canadian faculty members imagine future teaching and learning modalities? Educational Technology Research & Development, (In press). Watson, A., & Lupton, D. (2022). What happens next? Using the story completion method to surface the affects and materialities of digital privacy dilemmas. Sociological Research Online, 27(3), 690–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804221084343 Whitty, M. T. (2005). The realness of cybercheating: Men’s and women’s representations of unfaithful internet relationships. Social Science Computer Review, 23(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439304271536 Whyte, K. P. (2013). Justice forward: Tribes, climate adaptation and responsibility. Climatic Change, 120, 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0743-2 Yunkaporta, T. (2020). Sand talk: How Indigenous thinking can save the world. HarperOne. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27.