Ionospheric corrections tailored to Galileo HAS: validation with single-epoch navigation

Cristhian Camilo Timoté1, José Miguel Juan Zornoza1, Jaume Sanz Subirana1, Adrià Rovira-García1, Guillermo González-Casado1, Raül Orús‐Pérez2, Ignacio Fernández‐Hernández3, Daniel Blonski2
1Research Group of Astronomy and Geomatics (gAGE), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), José Miguel Juan, Jordi Girona, 1-3, 08034, Barcelona, Spain
2Wave Interaction and Propagation Section, European Space Agency (ESA), Noordwijk, The Netherlands
3Directorate-General for Defence Industry and Space (DEFIS), European Commission (EC), Brussels, Belgium

Tóm tắt

Abstract

The Galileo high accuracy service (HAS) is a new capability of the European global navigation satellite system, currently providing satellite orbit and clock corrections and dispersive effects such as satellite instrumental biases for code and phase. In its full capability, Galileo HAS will also correct the ionospheric delay on a continental scale (initially over Europe). We analyze a real-time ionospheric correction system based on the fast precise point positioning (F-PPP), and its potential application to the Galileo HAS. The F-PPP ionospheric model is assessed through a 281-day campaign, confirming previously reported results, where the proof of concept was introduced. We introduce a novel real-time test that directly links the instantaneous position error with the error of the ionospheric corrections, a key point for a HAS. The test involved 15 GNSS receivers in Europe acting as user receivers at various latitudes, with distances to the nearest reference receivers ranging from tens to four hundred kilometers. In the position domain, the test results show that the 95th percentile of the instantaneous position error depends on the user-receiver distance, as expected, ranging in the horizontal and vertical components from 10 to 30 cm and from 20 to 50 cm, respectively. These figures not only meet Galileo HAS requirements but outperform them by achieving instantaneous positioning. Additionally, it is shown that formal errors of the ionospheric corrections, which are also transmitted, are typically at the decimeter level (1 sigma), protecting users against erroneous position by weighting its measurements in the navigation filter.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Belehaki A et al (2020) An overview of methodologies for real-time detection, characterisation and tracking of traveling ionospheric disturbances developed in the TechTIDE project. J Space Weather Space Clim 10:42. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020043

Chen Q, Song S, Zhou W (2021) Accuracy analysis of GNSS hourly ultra-rapid orbit and clock products from SHAO AC of iGMAS. Remote Sens 13(5):1022

Duong V, Harima K, Choy S, Laurichesse D, Rizos C (2020) Assessing the performance of multi-frequency GPS, Galileo and BeiDou PPP ambiguity resolution. J Spat Sci 65(1):61–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2019.1658652

European GNSS Agency (2021) Galileo high accuracy service (HAS): info note. Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2878/581340

European GNSS Agency (2023) Galileo high accuracy service : service definition document (HAS SDD) : issue 1.0, January 2023. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2878/265974

Fernandez-Hernandez I et al (2022) Galileo high accuracy service: initial definition and performance. GPS Solut 26(3):65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-022-01247-x

Fernández-Hernandez I et al (2023) Galileo authentication and high accuracy: getting to the truth. Inside GNSS Magazine, Eugene, pp 58–65

Hadas T, Bosy J (2015) IGS RTS precise orbits and clocks verification and quality degradation over time. GPS Solut 19:93–105

Juan JM et al (2012) Enhanced precise point positioning for GNSS users. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 50(10):4213–4222

Juan JM, Sanz J, Rovira-Garcia A, González-Casado G, Ibáñez D, Perez RO (2018) AATR an ionospheric activity indicator specifically based on GNSS measurements. J Space Weather Space Clim 8:A14

Knight R (2023) Galileo high accuracy service now operational, providing corrections worldwide for free. INSIDE GNSS Magazine, Eugene

Laurichesse D, Banville S (2018) Innovation: instantaneous centimeter-level multi-frequency precise point positioning. GPS World, Innovation column 4 July.

Mannucci AJ, Wilson BD, Yuan DN, Ho CH, Lindqwister UJ, Runge TF (1998) A global mapping technique for GPS-derived ionospheric total electron content measurements. Radio Sci 33(3):565–582

Naciri N, Bisnath S (2023) RTK-quality positioning with global precise point positioning corrections. Navigation J Inst Nav 70(3):navi.575. https://doi.org/10.33012/navi.575

Naciri N, Yi D, Bisnath S, Javier de Blas F, Capua R (2023) Assessment of Galileo high accuracy service (HAS) test signals and preliminary positioning performance. GPS Solut 27:73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-023-01410-y

Prange L, Dach R, Lutz S, Schaer S, Jäggi A (2016) The CODE MGEX orbit and clock solution. In: Rizos C, Willis P (eds) IAG 150 Years. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 767–773

Psychas D, Verhagen S, Liu X, Memarzadeh Y, Visser H (2018) Assessment of ionospheric corrections for PPP–RTK using regional ionosphere modeling. Meas Sci Technol 30(1):14001

Rovira-Garcia A, Juan JM, Sanz J, Gonzalez-Casado G (2015) A worldwide ionospheric model for fast precise point positioning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 53(8):4596–4604

Rovira-Garcia A, Ibáñez-Segura D, Orús-Perez R, Juan JM, Sanz J, González-Casado G (2020) Assessing the quality of ionospheric models through GNSS positioning error: methodology and results. GPS Solut 24(1):4

Rovira-Garcia A, Timoté CC, Juan JM, Sanz J, González-Casado G, Fernández-Hernández I, Orus-Perez R, Blonski D (2021) Ionospheric corrections tailored to the Galileo high accuracy service. J Geodesy 95(12):130

Sanz-Subirana J, Juan-Zornoza JM, Hernández-Pajares M (2013) GNSS data processing, Vol. I: fundamentals and algorithms. ESA Communications. https://server.gage.upc.edu/TEACHING_MATERIAL/GNSS_Book/ESA_GNSS-Book_TM-23_Vol_I.pdf

Tossaint M, Samson J, Toran F, Ventura-Traveset J, Hernández-Pajares M, Juan JM, Sanz J, Ramos-Bosch P (2007) The Stanford–ESA integrity diagram: a new tool for the user domain SBAS integrity assessment. Navigation 54(2):153–162

Walter T, Hansen A, Enge P (1999) Validation of the WAAS MOPS integrity equation. In: Proceedings of the 55th annual meeting of the institute of navigation (1999), pp 217–226

Wübbena G, Schmitz M, Bagge A (2005) PPP–RTK: precise point positioning using state-space representation in RTK networks. In: Proceedings of the 18th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation (ION GNSS 2005), pp 2584–2594

Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jefferson DC, Watkins MM, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 102(B3):5005–5017. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jb03860