Investment principles and strategies of faith‐based funds

EmilBoasson1, VigdisBoasson1, JosephCheng1
1School of Business, Ithaca College, Ithaca, New York, USA

Tóm tắt

PurposeTo examine the rationale for the investment principles adopted by faith‐based funds from a biblical perspective and to evaluate the performance of faith‐based ethical funds.Design/methodology/approachA multi‐factor Carhart model is applied to examine the risk‐adjusted financial performance and investment strategies of faith‐based ethical funds.FindingsThe statistical results indicate that the faith‐based funds as a group do not under‐perform the market on a risk‐adjusted basis.Practical implicationsThis suggests that investment managers may incorporate moral/ethical components into their investment decisions without unduly shortchanging their clients for whom they have fiduciary duties.Originality/valueThis is one of the very few papers which study faith‐based funds.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abramson, L. and Chung, D. (2000), “Socially responsible investing: viable for value investors?”, Journal of Investing, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 73‐81.

Boasson, V., Cheng, J. and Boasson, E. (forthcoming), “Are investment managers investing ethically at a disadvantage?”, Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship.

Carhart, C. (1997), “On persistence in mutual fund performance”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 45 No. 5, pp. 57‐82.

Chan, L.K.C., Jegadeesh, N. and Lakonishok, J. (1996), “Momentum strategies”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 51 No. 5, pp. 1681‐714.

D’Antonio, L., Johnsen, T. and Hutton, B. (2000), “Socially responsible investing and asset allocation”, Journal of Investing, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 65‐72.

Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. (1993), “Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 3‐56.

Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. (1996), “Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 55‐84.

Hagelin, R. (2004), “Overdosing on porn”, The World & I, Vol. 19 No. 3, p. 20.

Hamilton, S., Jo, H. and Statman, M. (1993), “Doing well while doing good? The investment performance of socially responsible mutual funds”, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 49 No. 6, pp. 62‐6.

Jagadeesh, N. and Titman, S. (1993), “Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implications from stock market efficiency”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 65‐91.

Sauer, D.A. (1997), “The impact of social‐responsibility screens on investment performance: evidence from the Domini 400 social index and Domini equity mutual fund”, Review of Financial Economics, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 137‐49.

Schröder, M. (2003), Socially Responsible Investments in Germany, Switzerland and the United States ‐ An Analysis of Investment Funds and Indices, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 03‐10, Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH (Center for European Economic Research), Mannheim, Germany.

Statman, M. (2000), “Socially responsible mutual funds”, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 56 No. 3, pp. 30‐9.

White, M.A. (1995), “The performance of environmental mutual funds in the United States and Germany: is there economic hope for “Green” investors?”, Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Supplement 1, pp. 323‐44.